Skip to main content

Multi-player Multi-issue Negotiation with Complete Information

  • Chapter
Innovations in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 319))

Summary

This paper presents a multi-player multi-issue negotiation model to solve a resource allocation problem. We design a multilateral negotiation protocol, by which rational players bid sequentially in consecutive rounds till a deadline. Every player’s bid is a proposal for resources allocated to himself. In this framework, we perform a thorough theoretical analysis of negotiation with complete information, which is also a preliminary for the more complex incomplete information case. Here we extend known results on single issue bilateral negotiations to multiple players and multiple issues. We show that, under a complete information setting, we can derive the negotiation strategies which form a subgame perfect equilibrium. We also show that when a discount factor exists, an agreement will be reached immediately at the end of the first negotiation round. The outcome is Pareto optimal, when every player maximizes his utility by making trade-offs between issues and selects the bid that is best for his opponents amongst multiple bids that would give the same maximum utility to himself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bac, M., Raff, H.: Issue-by-Issue Negotiations: The Role of Information and Time Preference. Games and Economic Behavior 13(1), 125–134 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Binmore, K.: Bargaining and Coalitions. Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining, 269–304 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Busch, L.A., Horstmann, I.J.: Bargaining Frictions, Bargaining Procedures and Implied Costs in Multiple-Issue Bargaining. Economica 65(256), 669–680 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chae, S., Yang, J.A.: An N-person pure bargaining game. Journal of Economic Theory 62(1), 86–102 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation. Artificial Intelligence 152(1), 1–45 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Fatima, S.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Multi-Issue Negotiation with Deadlines. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 27, 381–417 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Fershtman, C.: The importance of the agenda in bargaining. Games and Economic Behavior 2(3), 224–238 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gerding, E.H., Somefun, D.J.A., La Poutre, J.A.H.: Multi-attribute Bilateral Bargaining in a One-to-Many Setting. In: Faratin, P., Rodríguez-Aguilar, J.-A. (eds.) AMEC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3435, p. 129. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrero, M.: A Strategic Bargaining Approach to Market Institutions. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis. University of London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Inderst, R.: Multi-issue Bargaining with Endogenous Agenda. Games and Economic Behavior 30(1), 64–82 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Jun, B.H.: A Structural Consideration on 3-Person Bargaining. Chapter III in Essays on Topics in Economic Theory, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Osborne, M.J.: An introduction to game theory. Oxford University Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rausser, G., Simon, L.: A non-cooperative model of collective decision making: A multilateral bargaining approach. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California, Berkeley (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model. Econometrica 50(1), 97–110 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Selten, R.: Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfragetragheit. Zeitschrift fur die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 12, 301–324 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shaked, A.: A Three-Person Unanimity Game. Talk given at the Los Angeles national meetings of the Institute of Management Sciences and the Operations Research Society of America (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ståhl, I.: Bargaining theory. Ekonomiska forskningsinstitutet vid Handelshögskolan i Stockholm, EFI (1972)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wu, M., de Weerdt, M., La Poutré, H., Yadati, C., Zhang, Y., Witteveen, C. (2010). Multi-player Multi-issue Negotiation with Complete Information. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T., Yamaki, H. (eds) Innovations in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 319. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15612-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15612-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15611-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15612-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics