Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 319))

Summary

Negotiations are known to proceed differently across cultures. A realistic agent model of international negotiations has to take cultural differences into account. This paper presents an agent-based model that tackles this challenge. The context is a trade game where commodities with a hidden quality attribute are exchanged. The negotiation model uses the ABMP negotiation architecture. It applies a utility function that includes market value, quality preference, and risk attitude. The indices of the five dimensions of Hofstede’s model of national cultures are used, in combination with agent’s group membership and societal status, to differentiate negotiation behavior by adaptation of weight factors in the utility function and ABMP parameters. The paper presents test runs with synthetic cultures and a set of actual national cultures. The present version of the model helps to understand behaviors in international trade networks. It proves that Hofstede’s dimensions can be used to generate culturally differentiated agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hofstede, G.: Culture’s Consequences, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Third Millennium Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smith, P.: Nations, Cultures, and Individuals: New Perspectives and Old Dilemmas. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 35(1), 50–61 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation. In: Nebel, B. (ed.) Proceedings Of the 17th International Joint Conference on AI, IJCAI 2001, pp. 1195–1201 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Individualism and Collectivism in Trade Agents. In: Nguyen, N.T., Borzemski, L., Grzech, A., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5027, pp. 492–501. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Modeling Power Distance in Trade. In: David, N., Sichman, J.S. (eds.) MABS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5269, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Meijer, S., Verwaart, T.: Modeling Trade and Trust across Cultures. In: Stølen, K., Winsborough, W.H., Martinelli, F., Massacci, F. (eds.) iTrust 2006. LNCS, vol. 3986, pp. 120–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Modeling Culture in Trade: Uncertainty Avoidance. In: Proceedings of 2008 Agent-Directed Simulation Symposium (ADS 2008), SCS, San Diego (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Long-term Orientation in Trade. In: Schredelseker, K., Hauser, F. (eds.) Complexity and Artificial Markets. LNEMS, vol. 614, pp. 107–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Raiffa, H.: Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson, L.L.: The Mind and Heart of the Negotiator, 3rd edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Negotiation Decision Functions for Autonomous Agents. Int. J. of Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24, 159–182 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Coehoorn, R.M., Jennings, N.R.: Learning an Opponent’s Preferences to Make Effective Multi-Issue Negotiation Trade-Offs. In: Proceedings of 6th International Conference on E-Commerce, pp. 59–68 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hindriks, K., Tykhonov, D.: Opponent Modeling in Automated Multi-Issue Negotiation using Bayesian Learning. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2008. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 331–338 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Meijer, S., Hofstede, G.J., Beers, G., Omta, S.W.F.: Trust and Tracing game: learning about transactions and embeddedness in a trade network. Production Planning and Control 17, 569–583 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tykhonov, D., Jonker, C., Meijer, S., Verwaart, T.: Agent-Based Simulation of the Trust and Tracing Game for Supply Chains and Networks. J. of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 11(3) (2008), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/3/1.html

  18. Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T.: Cultural Differentiation of Negotiating Agents. Group Decis Negot (2010), doi:10.1007/s10726-010-9190-x

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., van der Meij, L., Treur, J.: Automated Formal Analysis of Human Multi-Issue Negotiation Processes. Multi-Agent and Grid Systems Journal 4, 213–233 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An Agent Architecture for Multi-Attribute Negotiation Using Incomplete Preference Information. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems Journal 15, 221–252 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Adair, W., Brett, J., Lempereur, A., Okumura, T., Shikhirev, P., Tinsley, C., Lytle, A.: Culture and Negotiation Strategy. Negotiation Journal 20, 87–111 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar, R., Worm, V.: Institutional Dynamics and the Negotiation Process: Comparing India and China. International J. of Conflict Management 15, 304–334 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gelfand, M.J., Brett, J.M.: The Handbook of Negotiation and Culture. Stanford University Press, Stanford (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. de Rosis, F., Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I.: Transcultural Believability in Embodied Agents: A Matter of Consistent Adaptation. In: Payr, S., Trappl, R. (eds.) Agent Culture, pp. 75–105. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hofstede, G.J., Jonker, C.M., Verwaart, T. (2010). The Influence of Culture on ABMP Negotiation Parameters. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T., Yamaki, H. (eds) Innovations in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 319. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15612-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15612-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15611-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15612-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics