Abstract
The nineteenth century spawned various efforts to bring order into the elements encountered in nature. Among the most important was an inventory of the elements assembled by the Russian chemist Dimitri Mendeleyev in 1869, which grouped elements according to their chemical properties, their valences, as derived from the compounds they were able to form, at the same time sorting the elements by atomic weight. The genius of Mendeleyev lay in his confidence in these sorting principles, which enforced gaps in his table for expected but then unknown elements, and Mendeleyev was able to predict the physical and chemical properties of such elements-to-be-found. The tabular arrangement invented by Mendeleyev (Fig. 1.1) still is in use today, and is being populated at the high-mass end by the great experiments in heavy-ion collider laboratories to create the short-lived elements predicted to exist. The second half of the nineteenth century thus saw scientists being all-excited about chemistry and the fascinating discoveries one could make using Mendeleyev’s sorting principles. Note that this was some 30 years before sub-atomic particles and the atom were discovered. Today the existence of 112 elements is firmly established (the currently heaviest) element no. 112 was officially named Copernicium (Cn) in February 2010 by IUPAC, the international union of chemistry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In a broader sense, nuclear physics may be considered being similar to chemistry: elementary building blocks are rearranged to form different species, with macroscopically-emerging properties such as characteristic, well-defined energy releases in such transitions.
- 2.
States may differ in their quantum numbers, such as spin, or orbital-momenta projections; if they obtain the same energy E, they are called degenerate.
- 3.
The binding energy per nucleon is maximized for nucleons bound as a Fe nucleus.
- 4.
These masses may be either nuclear masses or atomic masses, the electron number is conserved, and their binding energies are negligible, in comparison.
- 5.
Within an FeNi meteorite, e.g., an α particle from radioactivity has a range of only \(\sim 10 \upmu\!m\).
- 6.
We ignore here two additional β decays which are possible from ν and \(\overline{\nu}\) captures, due to their small probabilities.
- 7.
This neutrino line has just recently been detected by the Borexino collaboration arriving from the center of the Sun (Arpesella et al., 2008).
- 8.
Gamma-rays from nuclear transitions following 56Ni decay (though this is a β decay by itself) inject radioactive energy through γ-rays from such nuclear transitions into the supernova envelope, where it is absorbed in scattering collisions and thermalized. This heats the envelope such that thermal and optically bright supernova light is created. Deposition of γ-rays from nuclear transitions are the engines which make supernovae to be bright light sources out to the distant universe, used in cosmological studies (Leibundgut 2000) to, e.g., support evidence for dark energy.
- 9.
We point out that there is no chemistry involved; the term refers to changes in abundances of chemical elements, which are a result of the changes in abundances of isotopes.
- 10.
This nomenclature may be misleading, it is used by convenience among astrophysicists. Only a part of these elements are actually metals under normal terrestial conditions.
- 11.
Deviations from the standard may be small, so that \([S_1/S_2]\) may be expressed in δ units (parts per mil), or ε units (parts in \(10^{4})\), or ppm and ppb; \(\delta(^29Si/^28Si)\) thus denotes excess of the \(^29Si/^28Si\) isotopic ratio above solar values in units of 0.1%.
- 12.
This implies a metallicity of solar matter of 1.4%. Earlier than \(\sim 2005\), the commonly-used value for solar metallicity had been 2%.
References
Arpesella, C., Back, H.O., Balata, M., et al.: Direct measurement of the Be7 solar neutrino flux with 192 days of Borexino data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101(9), 091,302 (2008). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.091302, 0805.3843
Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A.J., Scott, P.: The chemical composition of the sun. ARA&A 47, 481–522 (2009). doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222, 0909.0948
Bahcall, J.N.: Electron capture in stellar interiors. ApJ 139, 318 (1964). doi:10.1086/147755
Clayton, D.D., Nittler, L.R.: Astrophysics with presolar stardust. ARA&A 42, 39–78 (2004). doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134022
Diehl, R., Prantzos, N., von Ballmoos, P.: Astrophysical constraints from gamma-ray spectroscopy. Nucl. Phys. A 777, 70–97 (2006). doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.02.155, arXiv:astroph/0502324
Johnson, W.N. III, Harnden, F.R. Jr, Haymes, R.C.: The spectrum of low-energy gamma radiation from the galactic-center region. ApJ 172, L1 (1972). doi:10.1086/180878
Langanke, K., Martínez-Pinedo, G.: Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars. Rev. Modern Phys. 75, 819–862 (2003). doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.75.819, arXiv:nucl-th/0203071
Leibundgut, B.: Type Ia Supernovae. A&A Rev. 10, 179–209 (2000). doi:10.1007/s001590000009, arXiv:astro-ph/0003326
Messiah, A.: Quantum Mechanics. North-Holland Publication 1961–1962, Amsterdam (1962)
Pfennig, G., Klewe-Nebenius, H., Seelmann-Eggebert, W.: Karlsruher nuklidkarte – chart of nuclides, 7th edition. (2007) ISBN 3-92-1879-18-3
Reynolds, J.H.: Determination of the age of the elements. Phys. Rev. Lett. 4(1), 8 (1960). doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.8
Rutherford, E.: Radioactive processes. Proc. Phys. Soc. London 18, 595–600 (1903). doi:10.1088/1478-7814/18/1/360
Steigman, G.: Primordial nucleosynthesis in the precision cosmology era. Ann. Rev. Nucl. Particle Sci. 57, 463–491 (2007). doi:10.1146/annurev.nucl.56.080805.140437, 0712.1100
Takahashi, K., Yokoi, K.: Nuclear b-decays of highly ionized heavy atoms in stellar interiors. Nucl. Phys. A 404, 578–598 (1983). doi:10.1016/0375-9474(83)90277-4
Weisskopf, V.F.: Radiative transition probabilities in nuclei. Phys. Rev. 83, 1073–1073 (1951). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.83.1073
Weizsäcker, C.F.V.: Zur Theorie der Kernmassen. Zeitschrift fur Physik 96, 431–458 (1935). doi:10.1007/BF01337700
Yong, D., Lambert, D.L., Allende Prieto, C., Paulson, D.B.: Magnesium isotope ratios in hyades stars. ApJ 603, 697–707 (2004). doi:10.1086/381701, arXiv:astro-ph/0312054
Zinner, E.: Stellar nucleosynthesis and the isotopic composition of presolar grains from primitive meteorites. Ann. Rev. Earth and Planetary Sci. 26, 147–188 (1998). doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.26.1.147
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Diehl, R. (2011). Introduction to Astronomy with Radioactivity. In: Diehl, R., Hartmann, D., Prantzos, N. (eds) Astronomy with Radioactivities. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 812. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12698-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12698-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12697-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12698-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)