Abstract
This paper describes an effort towards building a Telugu Dependency Treebank. We discuss the basic framework and issues we encountered while annotating. 1487 sentences have been annotated in Paninian framework. We also discuss how some of the annotation decisions would effect the development of a parser for Telugu.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bamman, D., Crane, G.: The design and use of a Latin dependency treebank. In: Proc. of TLT 2006, pp. 67–78. FAL MFF UK, Prague (2006)
Begum, R., Husain, S., Dhwaj, A., Sharma, D., Bai, L., Sangal, R.: Dependency annotation scheme for Indian languages. In: Proc. of IJCNLP 2008 (2008)
Begum, R., Husain, S., Sharma, D.M., Bai, L.: Developing Verb Frames in Hindi. In: Proc. of LREC 2008, Marrakech, Morocco (2008)
Bharati, A., Husain, S., Sharma, D.M., Sangal, R.: A Two-Stage Constraint Based Dependency Parser for Free Word Order Languages. In: Proc. of the COLIPS IALP 2008, Chiang Mai, Thailand (2008)
Bharati, A., Husain, S., Sharma, D.M., Sangal, R.: In: Proc. of IWPT 2009, Paris (2009)
Bharati, A., Chaitanya, V., Sangal, R.: Natural Language Processing: A Paninian Perspective, pp. 65–106. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi (1995)
Bhatt, R., Narasimhan, B., Palmer, M., Rambow, O., Sharma, D.M., Xia, F.: A Multi-Representational and Multi-Layered Treebank for Hindi/Urdu. In: Proc. of TLT 2009 (2009)
Brants, S., Dipper, S., Hansen, S., Lezius, W., Smith, G.: The TIGER Treebank. In: Proc. of TLT 2002 (2002)
Bosco, C., Lombardo, V.: Dependency and relational structure in treebank annotation. In: Proc. of Workshop on Recent Advances in Dependency Grammar at COLING 2004 (2004)
Hajicova, E.: Prague Dependency Treebank: From Analytic to Tectogrammatical Annotation. In: Proc. TSD 1998 (1998)
Hudson, R.: Word Grammar. Basil Blackwell, 108, Cowley Rd, Oxford, OX4 1JF, England (1984)
Krishnamurti, B., Gwynn, J.P.L.: A grammar of modern Telugu. Oxford University Press, Delhi, New York (1985)
Mel’cuk, I.A.: Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University Press of New York (1988)
Marcus, M., Santorini, B., Marcinkiewicz, M.A.: Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. In: Computational Linguistics (1993)
Rambow, O., Creswell, C., Szekely, R., Taber, H., Walker, M.: A dependency treebank for English. In: Proc. of LREC 2002 (2002)
Shieber, S.M.: Evidence against the contextfreeness of natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 8, 334–343 (1985)
van der Beek, L., Bouma, G., Malouf, R., van Noord, G.: The Alpino dependency treebank. In: Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands (2002)
Vaidya, A., Husain, S., Mannem, P., Sharma, D.M.: A karaka-based dependency annotation scheme for English. In: Gelbukh, A. (ed.) CICLing 2009. LNCS, vol. 5449, pp. 41–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vempaty, C. et al. (2010). Issues in Analyzing Telugu Sentences towards Building a Telugu Treebank. In: Gelbukh, A. (eds) Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. CICLing 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6008. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12116-6_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-12115-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-12116-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)