Abstract
Trust dynamics can be modelled in relation to experiences. Both cognitive and neural models for trust dynamics in relation to experiences are available, but were not yet related or compared in more detail. This paper presents a comparison between a cognitive and a neural model. As each of the models has its own specific set of parameters, with values that depend on the type of person modelled, such a comparison is nontrivial. In this paper a comparison approach is presented that is based on mutual mirroring of the models in each other. More specifically, for given parameter values set for one model, by automated parameter estimation processes the most optimal values for the parameter values of the other model are determined to show the same behaviour. Roughly spoken the results are that the models can mirror each other up to an accuracy of around 90%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: Formal Analysis of Models for the Dynamics of Trust based on Experiences. In: Garijo, F.J., Boman, M. (eds.) MAAMAW 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1647, pp. 221–232. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: A Temporal-Interactivist Perspective on the Dynamics of Mental States. Cognitive Systems Research Journal 4, 137–155 (2003)
Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Trust dynamics: How Trust is Influenced by Direct Experiences and by Trust Itself. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2004, pp. 740–747 (2004)
Hoogendoorn, M., Jaffry, S.W., Treur, J.: Modeling Dynamics of Relative Trust of Competitive Information Agents. In: Klusch, M., Pěchouček, M., Polleres, A. (eds.) CIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5180, pp. 55–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Hoogendoorn, M., Jaffry, S.W., Treur, J.: Modelling Trust Dynamics from a Neurological Perspective. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Cognitive Neurodynamics, ICCN 2009. Springer, Heidelberg (to appear, 2009)
Damasio, A.: The Feeling of What Happens. Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. Harcourt Brace, New York (1999)
Damasio, A.: Looking for Spinoza. Vintage books, London (2004)
Damasio, A.: Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. Papermac, London (1994)
Damasio, A.: The Somatic Marker Hypothesis and the Possible Functions of the Prefrontal Cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences 351, 1413–1420 (1996)
Bechara, A., Damasio, A.: The Somatic Marker Hypothesis: a neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior 52, 336–372 (2004)
Hebb, D.: The Organisation of Behavior. Wiley, New York (1949)
Bi, G.Q., Poo, M.M.: Synaptic Modifications by Correlated Activity: Hebb’s Postulate Revisited. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 24, 139–166 (2001)
Gerstner, W., Kistler, W.M.: Mathematical formulations of Hebbian learning. Biol. Cybern. 87, 404–415 (2002)
Keysers, C., Perrett, D.I.: Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 501–507 (2004)
Keysers, C., Gazzola, V.: Unifying Social Cognition. In: Pineda, J.A. (ed.) Mirror Neuron Systems: the Role of Mirroring Processes in Social Cognition, pp. 3–28. Humana Press/Springer Science (2009)
Hoogendoorn, M., Jaffry, S.W., Treur, J.: An Adaptive Agent Model Estimating Human Trust in Information Sources. In: Proceedings of the 9th IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, IAT 2009. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (to appear, 2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jaffry, S.W., Treur, J. (2009). Comparing a Cognitive and a Neural Model for Relative Trust Dynamics. In: Leung, C.S., Lee, M., Chan, J.H. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5863. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10677-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10677-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-10676-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-10677-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)