Skip to main content

Is Australian Data Really Validating EGM2008, or Is EGM2008 Just in/Validating Australian Data?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation

Part of the book series: International Association of Geodesy Symposia ((IAG SYMPOSIA,volume 135))

Abstract

The tide-free release of the EGM2008 combined global geopotential model and its pre-release PGM2007A are compared with Australian land and marine gravity observations, co-located GPS-levelling on the [admittedly problematic] Australian Height Datum, astrogeodetic deflections of the vertical, and the AUSGeoid98 regional gravimetric quasigeoid model. The results show that we cannot legitimately claim to truly validate EGM2008. Instead, EGM2008 confirms already-known problems with the Australian data, as well as revealing some previously unknown problems. If one wants to claim validation, then EGM2008 is validated because it can confirm the errors in our regional data. Simply, EGM2008 is a good model over Australia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Claessens, S.J., W.E. Featherstone, and F. Barthelmes (2001). Experiences with point-mass modelling in the Perth region, Western Australia. Geomatics Res.Australasia 75, 53–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, W.E. (2001). Absolute and relative testing of gravimetric geoid models using Global Positioning System and orthometric height data. Comput. Geosci., 27(7), 807–814, doi: 10.1016/S0098-3004(00)00169-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, W.E. (2003). Improvement to long-wavelength Australian gravity anomalies expected from the GRACE, CHAMP and GOCE dedicated satellite gravimetry missions. Explor. Geophys., 34(1–2), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, W.E. (2004). Evidence of a north-south trend between AUSGeoid98 and AHD in southwest Australia. Surv. Rev., 37(291), 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, W.E. (2006). Yet more evidence for a north-south slope in the AHD. J. Spatial Sci., 51(2), 1–6; corrigendum in 52(1), 65–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, W.E. et al. (2001). The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS/levelling data. J. Geod., 75(5–6), 313–330, doi: 10.1007/s001900100177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, W.E. et al. (2004). GPS-geodetic monitoring of the southwest seismic zone of Western Australia: epoch-one. J. Royal Soc. WA., 87(1), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, W.E. et al. (2007). Progress towards the new Australian geoid-type model as a replacement for AUSGeoid98, Proc SSC2007, Hobart, May [CD-ROM].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jekeli, C. (1999). An analysis of vertical deflections derived from high-degree spherical harmonic models. J. Geod., 73(1), 10–22, doi: 10.1007/s001900050213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, A.H.W. (1976). The computation of deflections of the vertical from gravity anomalies, UNISURV Rep S15, Univ of NSW, Sydney, p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J.F., W.E. Featherstone, and A.H.W. Kearsley (1998). Tests of the DMA/GSFC geopotential models over Australia. Int. Geod. Serv. Bull., 7, 2–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoine, F.G. et al. (1998). The development of the joint NASA, GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96, NASA/TP-1998-206861, NASA, Greenbelt, p. 575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, R.S., C. Rizos, B. Hirsch, and B.C. Barlow (1976). An Australian gravity data bank for sea surface topography determinations (AUSGAD76), UNISURV G25, School of Surveying, Univ of NSW, Sydney, pp. 54–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, A.S. (1997). The Australian national gravity database. AGSO J. Aust. Geol. Geophys., 17, 145–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlis, N.K., S.A. Holmes, S.C. Kenyon, and J.K. Factor (2008). An earth gravitational model degree 2160: EGM2008. Presented at the 2008 General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria, April 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roelse, A., H.W. Granger, and J.W. Graham (1971). The adjustment of the Australian levelling survey 1970-1971, Tech Rep 12, Div of National Mapping, Canberra, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell, D.T. and W.H.F. Smith (1997). Marine gravity anomaly from Geosat and ERS-1 altimetry. J. Geophys. Res., 102(B5), 10039–10054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soltanpour, A., H. Nahavandchi, and W.E. Featherstone (2006). The use of second-generation wavelets to combine a gravimetric geoid model with GPS-levelling data. J. Geod., 80(2), 82–93, doi: 10.1007/s00190-006-0033-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, P.A. and J.B. Willcox (1976). The gravity field offshore Australia. BMR J. Aust. Geol. Geophys., 1(1), 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapley, B. et al. (2005). GGM02 – An improved Earth gravity field model from GRACE. J. Geod., 79(8), 467–478, doi: 10.1007/s00190-005-0480-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregoning, P., K. Lambeck, and G. Ramillien (2008). GRACE estimates of sea surface height anomalies in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 271(1–4), 241–244, doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2008.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from the Australian Research Council via grant DP0663020. Naturally, the suppliers of data are thanked too.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. J. Claessens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Claessens, S.J., Featherstone, W.E., Anjasmara, I.M. (2010). Is Australian Data Really Validating EGM2008, or Is EGM2008 Just in/Validating Australian Data?. In: Mertikas, S. (eds) Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 135. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10634-7_63

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics