Skip to main content

Scientific, Botanical, and Biological Research on Maize

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Maize Cobs and Cultures: History of Zea mays L.
  • 2158 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter takes an historical approach to maize research. It is focused on early studies in the archaeological and biological sciences: How did these studies indirectly influence the current debates? How were these debates directly influenced by earlier research on plant domestication in the Old World? How are the methodological approaches taken by the New World archaeologists, specialized in domestication and early agriculture, different from those taken by such specialists in the Old World? How do these differences affect the history of research on the origins and spread of maize? Recent groundbreaking results from maize geneticists have indicated that earlier archaeological interpretations of plant domestication and the economic significance of maize need to be reconsidered, yet earlier research and interpretations continue to strongly influence the current research. The term domestication has come to be used in the archaeological and biological literature as referring to a symbiotic relationship among human populations, the local ecology, a mutualism or coevolution that is not necessarily dependent on human involvement, particularly with reference to resource management. In this volume, domestication is defined as the genetic change brought about in a biotic population as a result of interactions with humans, and leads to a dependence relationship (Benz and Staller 2006, p. 665). These definitions on the process of domestication are more in line with those generally published in the biological sciences. Prior to the recent developments in direct dating and molecular biology, archaeologists and historians perceived agricultural practices surrounding primary economic cultigens in terms of a culture history. There appears to have been a general consensus with regard to the economic importance of food plants such as maize in the ancient past, in part because maize was seen as analogous to wheat and barley in the Old World.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note: this is not the way it has generally been defined in the archaeological literature and to a lesser extent in the biological literature, particularly before the middle of the last century.

  2. 2.

    Agriculture is defined as a symbiotic or mutual interdependence of any food plant and humans (Smith 2001, 2005b; Benz and Staller 2006).

  3. 3.

    There is some reason to believe that this historical shift in theory and methodological approaches in American Anthropology may be related, at least in part, to the passing of Franz Boas in December of 1942. The Father of American Anthropology and a staunch proponent of a holistic, four-field approach to anthropological research, he trained many of the most prominent and influential scholars of their generation (Willey and Sabloff 1980, pp. 84–85, pp. 94–95).

  4. 4.

    The role of Tripsacum (gama grass) in the origins of maize has been refuted by modern genetic analysis, negating the tripartite hypothesis (DeWet and Harlan 1972, 1976; Matsuoka et al. 2002; Iltis 2006, pp. 43–44).

  5. 5.

    The founder effect is the loss of genetic variation that occurs when a new population is established by a very small number of individuals from a larger population (Mayr 1942, p. 120). The new population may be distinctively different as a result of the loss of genetic variation both genetically and in terms of phenotypic expression (Provine 2004).

  6. 6.

    Cotton Mather was a Quaker, a puritan divine who condoned the persecution of “witches” but not the extreme methods of execution used by their prosecutors. Mather was aware of the effect of corn pollen from one variety falling on the silks of another and reported on this in various publications. Paul Dudley, a wealthy aristocrat, whose family were bitter enemies of the Mather clan, reported on the same phenomenon 8 years later without citing Mather’s published work (Wallace and Brown 1956, pp. 45–47). Dudley referred to pollination as “wonderful copulation” (Wallace and Brown 1956, p. 47).

  7. 7.

    Teosinte takes its name from the Nahuat teocintli, which means good or evil grain and is used to widely refer to seven taxa of wild grasses closely related to maize (Benz 2006, p. 9).

  8. 8.

    Mangelsdorf (1974, pp. 72–73) asserted sugarcane of the genus Saccharum can cross with Zea, producing infertile hybrids, but others consider this claim unproven (Clayton and Renvoize 1986, p. 331). However, both sugarcane and maize stalks produce sweet juice that can be easily extracted and once the sugar is concentrated, consumed in making syrup and particularly alcoholic beverages or pulque (Smalley and Blake 2003, p. 675).

  9. 9.

    The most puzzling teosinte is Z. mays ssp. huehuetenangensis, which combines morphology rather like Z. mays ssp. parviglumis with many terminal chromosome knobs and an isozyme position between the two sections. Phenotypically, the most distinctive and the most threatened teosinte is Z. nicaraguensis, which thrives in flooded conditions along 200 meters of a coastal estuarine river in the northwest Nicaragua (Iltis 2006). There may be some questions regarding the Nicaraguan species, as geneticists do not mention it (see e.g., Matsuoka et al. 2002; Vigouroux et al. 2003).

  10. 10.

    Subsequently, direct AMS dates on some of the earliest of the San Marcos and Coxcatlan cobs have shown that they were more recent in time, raising considerable controversy and debate in the field of archaeology and palaeoethnobotany (Long and Fritz 2001; see also Smith 2005a).

  11. 11.

    Mangelsdorf et al. (1967, pp. 179–180, Fig. 97) believed that they had identified a specimen of pod corn derived from San Marcos Cave, Zones F and E, which were dated by association to 7,000 years ago (see Fig. 3.5a). Later he joked that his initials stood for “Pod Corn Maize.” Mangelsdorf continued to declare until his passing in 1989 at the age of 90, that pod corn represented the wild ancestor of maize (Fussell 1992, p. 78).

  12. 12.

    Manisuris is teosinte now classified as Zea mays ssp. mexicana. Yoshihiro Matsuoka and his collaborators (2002:6083) have emphasized the importance of gene flow from Z. mays ssp. mexicana as contributing to the maize diversity. This subspecies grows as a weed in many highland maize fields (above 1,800–2,500 m) where it frequently hybridizes with maize, whereas Z. mays ssp. parviglumis often grows at lower elevations (below 1,800 m) and rarely hybridizes with maize (Wilkes 1967, 1977). Z. mays ssp mexicana is also adapted to lower rainfall (500–1,000 mm) than subspecies parviglumis (Pearsall and Piperno 1998, p. 161). These various factors appear to play a role in this subspecies’ role to maize diversity.

  13. 13.

    For example, this Osage myth; “For the fourth time Buffalo threw himself upon the earth, And the speckled corn, Together with the speckled squash, He tossed into the air, Then spake, saying: “What living creature is there that has no mate?” And thus he wedded together the speckled corn, a male, to the speckled squash, a female. He continued: “The little ones shall use this plant for food as they travel the path of life. Thus they shall make for themselves to be free from all the causes of death as they travel the path of life.” (Rankin 2006, p. 563).

  14. 14.

    Bonafous’ classical monograph “Histoire naturelle, agricole et economique du Mais”, published in 1836, makes reference to pod corn which he called Zea cryptosperma. Pod corn is currently classified as Zea mays var. tunicata Larrañaga ex A. St. Hilaire.

  15. 15.

    All teosinte species are diploid (n = 10) except Z. perennis, which is tetraploid (n = 20). The different species and subspecies can be readily distinguished based on morphological, cytogenetic, protein and DNA differences and on geographic origin, although the two perennials are sympatric and very similar.

  16. 16.

    Collins (1931) noted early on that the region that includes Peru, Bolivia, and Ecuador has a greater diversity of maize varieties than the whole North American continent, presumably making it a center of origin (Mangelsdorf and Reeves 1939, pp. 242–243).

  17. 17.

    MacNeish and Eubanks (2000, p. 15) claimed that the Tehuacán cob samples AMS dated by Long et al. (1989) were contaminated by Bedacryl, a polymethyl acrylate used to preserve fragile botanical materials. The Mexican curators, however, stated emphatically that they never treated the macrobotanical remains since they arrived at the national museum in Mexico City in the early 1970s (Long and Fritz 2001, p. 88). Moreover, when Benz conducted his morphological analysis of the remains he commented to Long and Fritz that they were covered with soil and ash from the original excavation (Long and Fritz 2001).

  18. 18.

    The fact that 2,000 b.p. maize cobs from Tularosa carried an su1 allele which occurs today in teosinte but is very rare in modern maize, suggests that the selection process at su1 was incomplete at that time making such maize unsuitable for the manufacture of tortillas. This implies that the selection for su1 starch properties occurred long after the initial domestication of maize in central Mexico.

  19. 19.

    Maize DNA studies have shown that up to 12% of its genetic material was obtained from Zea mays ssp. mexicana through introgression or gene flow, more specifically, by backcrossing an interspecific hybrid with one of the parent species (Matsuoka et al. 2002, p. 6083).

  20. 20.

    His sixth category, pod corn, was at the time a botanical curiosity, but one, which in later years, had a profound effect on research on maize origins and phylogeny.

  21. 21.

    The general tendency in the archaeological and biological literature has been to assume an overall pattern of selection for more productive (larger kernels and/or more rows) Pre-Columbian landraces over time.

  22. 22.

    Anagenesis refers to the persistence of one or a suite of biological traits that over time leads to varietal divergence. Cladogenesis refers to the development of evolutionary novelty through the extinction of pre-existing forms (Benz and Staller 2006, p. 665).

  23. 23.

    This would explain in part the differences noted among landraces with regard to their ability to resist drought and insect infestation, and adapt to higher elevations.

References

  • Adams KR (1994) A regional synthesis of Zea mays in the Prehistoric American Southwest. In: Johannessen S, Hastorf CA (eds) Corn and culture in the prehistoric new World. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 273–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman AJ, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1971) Measuring the rate of spread of early farming in Europe. Man 6:674–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (1944) Homologies of the ear and tassel in Zea mays. Ann Mo Bot Gard 31:325–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (1947a) Popcorn. Nat His 56(5):227–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E (1952) Plants, man and life. University of California, Berkeley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Cutler H (1942) Races of Zea mays I. Their recognition and classification. Ann Mo Bot Gard 29:69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascherson P (1875) Ueber Euchlaena mexicana. Schradscreift Botanica Vereins Provence Brandenburg 17:76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • de Azara F (1809) Voyages dans l’Amérique Méridionale. Paris 1:146–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey LH (1892) A new maize and its behavior under cultivation. Cornell Agric Expedition Stat Bull 49:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker G (1985) Prehistoric farming in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Yosef O, Belfer-Cohen A (1992) From foraging to farming in the Mediterranean Levant. In: Gebauer AB, Price TD (eds) Transitions to agriculture in prehistory, Monographs in World Archaeology No. 4. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI, pp 21–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle GW (1939) Teosinte and the origin of maize. J Hered 30:245–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle GW (1972) The mystery of maize. Chicago. Field Mus Natl His Bull 43(10):2–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Beadle GW (1980) The ancestry of corn. Sci Am 242(1):112–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennetzen J, Buckler E, Chandler V, Doebley J, Dorwheiler J, Gaut B, Freeling M, Hake S, Kellogg E, Peothig RS, Walbot V, Wessler S (2001) Genetic evidence and the origin of maize. Lat Am Antiq 12:84–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz B (1999) On the origin, evolution and dispersal of maize. In: Blake M (ed) Pacific Latin America in prehistory. The evolution of archaic and formative cultures. Washington State University Press, Pullman, pp 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz BF (2001) Archaeological evidence of teosinte domestication from Guilá Naquitz, Oaxaca. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(4):2104–2106

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz BF (2006) Maize in the Americas. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of maize: multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz BF, Iltis HH (1990) Studies in archaeological maize. I. The “wild” maize from San Marcos Cave reexamined. Am Antiq 55:500–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz B, Long A (2000) Early evolution of maize in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Curr Anthropol 41(3):459–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz BF, Staller JE (2006) The antiquity, biogeography, and culture history of maize in the Americas. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 647–673

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz BF, Staller JE (2009) The antiquity, biogeography, and culture history of maize in Mesoamerica. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of maize in mesoamerica: multidisciplinary approaches. LeftCoast Press, Walnut Creek, CA, pp 267–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Benz B, Perales H, Brush S (2007) Tzeltal and Tzotzil farmer knowledge and maize diversity in chiapas, Mexico. Curr Anthropol 48(2):289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin B (1992) Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin B, Breedlove DE, Raven PH (1974) Principles of Tzeltal plant classification. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake M (2006) Dating the initial spread of maize. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of Maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 55–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake M, Chisholm BS, Clark JE, Voorhies B, Love MW (1992) Prehistoric subsistence in the soconusco region. Curr Anthropol 33(1):83–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake M, Chisholm BS, Clark JE, Voorhies B, Michaels G, Love MW, Pye ME, Demarest AA, Arroyo B (1995) Radiocarbon chronology for the late archaic and formative periods on the Pacific coast of southeastern Mesoamerica. Anc Mesoamerica 6:161–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogucki P (1996) The spread of early farming in Europe. Am Sci 84:242–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonafous M (1836) Histoire naturelle, agricole et economique du Mais. Madame Huzard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonzani R, Oyuela-Caycedo A (2006) The gift of the variation and dispersion of maize: Social and technological context in Amerindian societies. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 344–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Boturini L (1746) Idea de una nueva historia general de la América Septentrional. Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidwood R (1952) From cave to village. Sci Am 187:62–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidwood R (1960) The agricultural revolution. Sci Am 203:130–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CH (1999a) Lexical acculturation in Native American languages. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown CH (2006a) Glottochronology and the chronology of maize in the Americas. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 647–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown WL (1960) Races of maize in the West Indies, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council Publication 792. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruman HJ (2000) Alcohol in ancient Mexico. Forward by Peter T. Furst. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City, UT

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush MB, Piperno DR, Colinvaux PA (1989) A 6000-year history of Amazonian maize cultivation. Nature 340(6231):303–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen EO (1967) Analysis of the Tehuacan coprolites. In: DS Byers (ed) The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, vol. 1, Environment and subsistence. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, pp. 261–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell L (1997) American Indian languages: the historical linguistics of Native America. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Camus-Kulandaivelu LC, Chevin LM, Tollon-Cordet C, Charcosset A, Manicacci D, Maud I (2008) Tenaillon patterns of molecular evolution associated with two selective sweeps in the Tb1–Dwarf8 region in Maize. Genetics 180:1107–1121

    Google Scholar 

  • Carneiro RL (2002) Herbert Spencer’s principles of sociology: a centennial retrospective and appraisal. Ann Sci 59:221–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Chávez SJ, Thompson RG (2006) Early maize on the Copacabana peninsula: implications for the archaeology of Lake Titicaca basin. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 415–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe VG (1935) Changing methods and aims in prehistory. Proc Prehistoric Soc 1:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe VG (1946) What happened in history, 1st edn. Penguin Books, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe VG (1951a) Social evolution. Meridian Books, Cleveland

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe VG (1951b) Man makes himself, 2nd edi. The New American Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson AJ (2003) Popol Vuh: sacred book of the Maya. O Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Christenson AJ (2008) Places of emergence: sacred mountains and cofradía ceremonies. In: Staller JE (ed) Pre-Columbian landscapes of creation and origin. Springer, New York, pp 95–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark JE (1994) The development of early formative rank societies in the soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark RM, Nussbaum Wagler T, Quijada P, Doebley J (2006) A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene tb1 has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture. Nat Genet 38:594–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton WD, Renvoize SA (1986) Genera graminum: grasses of the World, vol 13, Kew bulletin additional series. HMSO Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe MD (1994a) Mexico, 4th edn. Thames and Hudson, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins GN (1917) Hybrids of Zea tunicata and Zea ramose. J Agric Res 9:383–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins GN (1921) Teosinte in Mexico. J Hered 12:339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins GN (1931) The phylogeny of maize. Bull Torrey Bot Club 57:199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler HC (1952) A preliminary survey of plant remains of tularosa cave. In: Martin PS, Rinaldo JB, Bluhm E, Cutler HC, Grange R Jr (eds) Mogollon cultural continuity and change. The stratigraphic analysis of tularosa and cordova caves, Fieldiana: Anthropology 40. Field Museum of Natural History Museum, Chicago, pp 461–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler HC (2001) Cultivated plants from Picuris. In: Blake LW, Cutler HC (eds) Plants from the Past. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp 16–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • deWet JMJ, Harlan JR (1972) Origin of maize: the tripartite hypothesis. Euphytica 21:271–279

    Google Scholar 

  • deWet JMJ, Harlan JR (1978) Tripsacum and the origin of maize. In: Walden DW (ed) Maize breeding and genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 129–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis E, Peacock W (1984) Knob heterochromatin homology in maize and its relatives. J Mol Evol 20:341–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond J (1997) Location, location, location: the first farmers. Science 278:1243–1244

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RMW (1997) The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobrizhoffer M (1822 [1784]) An account of the Abipones. John Murray, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF (1990a) Molecular data and the evolution of maize. Econ Bot 44(3 Suppl.):6–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF (1994) Morphology, molecules, and maize. In: Johannessen S, Hastorf CA (eds) Corn and culture in the prehistoric New World. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 101–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley J (2001) George Beadle’s other hypothesis: one-gene: one trait. Perspectives. Genet Soc Am 158:487–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF, Iltis HH (1980) Taxonomy of Zea (Gramineae): a subgeneric classification with key to taxa. Am J Bot 67(6):982–993

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF, Stec A (1991) Genetic analysis of the morphological differences between maize and teosinte. Genetics 129:285–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF, Wang RL (1997) Genetics and the evolution of plant form: an example from maize. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 62:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF, Goodman MM, Stuber CW (1983) Isozyme variation in maize from the Southwestern United States: taxonomic and anthropological implications. Maydica 28:97–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley J, Goodman M, Stuber C (1984) Isoenzymatic variation in zea (Gramineae). Syst Bot 93:203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley J, Stec A, Wendel J, Edwards M (1990) Genetic and morphological analysis of a maize teosinte F2 population: implications for the origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9888–9892

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF, Stec A, Hubbard L (1997) The evolution of apical dominance in maize. Nature 386:485–488

    Google Scholar 

  • Doebley JF, Gaut BS, Smith BD (2006) The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 127:1309–1321

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorweiler JE (1996) Genetic and evolutionary analysis of glume development in maize and teosinte. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Minnesota. University of Michigan Microfilms, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorweiler JE, Doebley J (1997) Developmental analysis of Teosinte Glume Architecture1: a key lucus in the evolution of maize (POACEAE). Am J Bot 84(10):1313–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorweiler J, Stec A, Kermicle J, Doebley J (1993) Teosinte glume architecture 1: a genetic locus controlling a key step in maize evolution. Science 262:233–235

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks MW (1995) A cross between two maize relatives: Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea diploperennis (Poaceae). Econ Bot 49:172–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks MW (1997) Molecular analysis of crosses between Tripsacum dactyloides and Zea diploperennis (Poaceae). Theor Appl Genet 94:707–712

    Google Scholar 

  • Eubanks MW (2001a) An interdisciplinary perspective on maize. Lat Am Antiq 12:91–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Enfield E (1866) Indian corn: its value, culture, and uses. Appleton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyre-Walker A, Gaut RL, Hilton H, Feldman DL, Gaut BS (1998) Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:4441–4446

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery KV (1972a) The origins of the village as a settlement type in Mesoamerica and the Near East: a comparative study. In: Ucko PJ, Tringham R, Dimbleby GW (eds) Man, settlement and urbanism. Schenkman Publishing, Cambridge, MA, pp 23–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery KV (1973) The origins of agriculture. Annu Rev Anthropol 2:271–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery KV (1986a) The research problem. In: Flannery KV (ed) Guilá Naquitz: archaic foraging and early agriculture in Oaxaca. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford J (1969) A comparison of formative of cultures in the Americas, vol II, Smithsonian contributions in anthropology. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford RI (1985a) Processes of food production in North America. In: Ford RI (ed) Prehistoric food production in North America, Anthropological Papers No. 75. Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, pp 341–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas FO (2001) Estudo genético-evolutivo de amostras modernas e arqueológicas de milho (Zea mays mays, L.) e feijão (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.). Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. University of São Paulo, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas FO, Brendel G, Allaby RG, Brown TA (2003) DNA from primitive maize landraces and archaeological remains: implications for the domestication of maize and its expansion into South America. J Archaeol Sci 31:901–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz GJ (1994) Are the first American farmers getting younger? Curr Anthropol 35:305–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell B (1992) The story of maize. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat WC (1954) Corn grass I: corn grass as the possible prototype or a false progenitor of maize. Am Nat 88:101–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat WC (1964) Tripsacum a possible Amphidiploid of Manisuris and wild maize. Maize Genet Coop News Lett 38:50

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat WC (1970) The cupule and its role in the origin and evolution of maize. Massachusetts Agric Exp Stat Bull 585:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat WC (1976) The inheritance of some traits essential to maize and Teosinte. In: Walden DW (ed) Maize breeding and genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 93–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat WC (1983) The origin of maize as shown by key morphological traits of its Ancestor, Teosinte. Maydica 28:121–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat WC (1985) Domestication and diffusion of maize. In: Ford RI (ed) Prehistoric food production in North America, Anthropology Papers 75. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Galinat WC (1988) The origin of corn. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement, 3rd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebauer AB, Price TD (eds) (1992) Transitions to agriculture in prehistory. Monographs in World Archaeology No. 4. Prehistory Press, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil AF (2003) Zea mays on the South American periphery: chronology and dietary Importance. Curr Anthropol 44(2):295–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ (2007) Linnaeus in the information age. Nature 446(15):259–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman MM (1968) The races of maize II. Use of multivariate analysis of variance to measure morphological similarity. Crop Sci 8:693–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman MM (1978) A brief survey of the races of maize and current attempts to infer racial relationships. In: Walden DW (ed) Maize Breeding and Genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 143–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman MM, McKBird R (1977) The races of maize. IV. Tentative grouping of 219 Latin American races. Econ Bot 31:204–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Goloubinoff P, Pääbo S, Wilson AC (1993) Evolution of maize inferred from sequence diversity of an Adh2 gene segment from archaeological specimens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:1997–2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (2002) The structure of evolutionary theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Grobman A, Salhuana W, Sevilla R (1961) Races of maize in Peru, their origins, evolution and classification [by] and in collaboration with Paul C. Mangelsdorf. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hard RJ, Roney JR (1998) A massive terraced village complex in Chihuahua, Mexico, 3000 Years before present. Science 279:1661–1664

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR (1975) Crops and man. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlan JR, de Wet JMJ, Price E (1973) Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution 22:311–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris DR (1989) An evolutionary continuum of people-plant interaction. In: Harris DR, Hillman G (eds) Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploitation. Unwin Hyman, London, pp 11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshberger JW (1893) Maize: a botanical and economic study. Contributions from the Botanical Laboratory of the University of Pennsylvania. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshberger JW (1896a) Fertile crosses of teosinte and maize. Gard Forest 9:522–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Harshberger JW (1896b) The purpose of Ethnobotany. Am Antiq 17(2):73–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam M (2004) The decomposition of starch grains in soils: implications for archaeological residue analysis. J Archaeol Sci 31:1715–1734

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastorf CA (1994) The changing approaches to maize research. In: Oyuela-Caycedo A (ed) History of Latin American archaeology. Avebury, Brookfield, CO, pp 139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser C (1988) Aspects of unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants. Euphytica 37:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JH (2001) Proto-Uto-Aztecan: a community of cultivators in central Mexico? Am Anthropol 1003:913–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill JH (2006) The historical linguistics of maize cultivation in Mesoamerica and North America. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of maize: multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 631–645

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoopes JW (1994) Ford revisited: a critical review of the chronology and relationship of the earliest ceramic complexes in the New World, 6000-1500 B.C. J World Prehistory 8(1):1–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins NA (2006) The place of maize in Indigenous Mesoamerican Folk Taxonomies. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 611–622

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn SP (2006) Pre-Columbian maize agriculture in Costa Rica: pollen and other evidence from Lake and Swamp Sediments. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 368–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckell BB (1990) Late preceramic farmer-foragers in Southeastern Arizona: A Cultural and Ecological consideration of the Spread of Agriculture into the Arid Southwestern United States. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Arid Lands Resource Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckell BB, Huckell L, Fish SK (1995) Investigations at Milagro, a Late Preceramic Site in the Eastern Tucson Basin. Technical Report 94-95. Center for Desert Archaeology, Tucson

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckell L (2006) Ancient maize in the American Southwest: What does it look like and what can it tell us. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH (1971) The maize mystique - a reappraisal of the origin of corn. (photo-offset). Botany Department University of Wisconsin, Madison [1985. republished in Contrib. Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison Herbarium 5: 1-4]

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH (1972) The taxonomy of Zea mays (Gramineae). Phytologia 23:248–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH (1983) From teosinte to maize: the catastrophic sexual transmutation. Science 222:886–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH (2000) Homeotic sexual translocations and the origin of maize (Zea mays, Poaceae): a new look at an old problem. Econ Bot 54(1):7–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH (2004) Domestication of Zea: First for sugar and then for grain? A novel idea with vast implications. Paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH (2006) Polystichy in Maize. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 21–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH, Doebley JF (1980) Taxonomy of Zea (Gramineae). II. Sub-specific categories in the Zea mays complex and a generic synopsis. Am J Bot 67:994–1004

    Google Scholar 

  • Iltis HH, Doebley JF, Guzman MR, Pazy B (1979) Zea diploperennis (Gramineae): a new teosinte from Mexico. Science 203:186–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke-Després V, Buckler ES, Smith BD, Gilbert TM, Cooper A, Doebley J, Pääbo S (2003) Early allelic selection in maize as revealed by ancient DNA. Science 302:1206–1208

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke-Després V, Smith BD (2006) Ancient DNA and the integration of archaeological and genetic approaches to the study of maize domestication. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane J, Chen J (1992) Effect of amylose molecular size and amylopectin branch chain length on paste properties of starch. Cereal Chem 69:60–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Jane J, Chen J, Lee LF, McPherson AE, Wong KS, Radosavljevic M, Kasemsuwan T (1999) Effects of amylopectin branch chain length and amylose content on the gelatinization and pasting properties of starch. Cereal Chem 76:629–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson F, MacNeish RS (1972) Chronometric dating. In: Johnson F (ed) The prehistory of the Tehuacán valley, vol 4, Chronology and Irrigation. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX, pp 3–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman T (1994) The native languages of Mesoamerica. In: Moseley C, Asher RE (eds) Atlas of the World’s languages. Routledge, London, pp 34–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan L, Lynch TF (1999) Phaseolus (Fabacaea) in archaeology. AMS radiocarbon dates and their significance for Pre-Columbian agriculture. Econ Bot 53:261–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly RL (1995) The foraging spectrum: diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerman WA (1895) Primitive corn. Meehan’s Mon 5(44):53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg E, Birchler J (1993) Linking phylogeny and genetics: Zea mays as a tool for phylogenetic studies. Syst Biol 42:415–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimura M (1986) The Neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Langham D (1940) The inheritance of intergeneric differences in Zea Euchlaena hybrids. Genetics 25:88–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrap DW (1970) Upper amazon. Thames and Hudson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrap DW, Collier D, Chandra H (1975) Ancient Ecuador culture, clay, and creativity 3000–300 BC. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley J (1846) A note upon the wild state of maize or Indian corn. J Hortic Soc Lond 1:114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Long A, Fritz GJ (2001) Validity of AMS dates on maize from the Tehuacán Valley: a comment on MacNeish and Eubanks. Lat Am Antiq 12:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Long A, Benz BF, Donahue DJ, Jull AJT, Toolin LJ (1989) First direct AMS dates on early maize from Tehuacán, Mexico. Radiocarbon 31(3):1035–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS (1947) Preliminary report on coastal Tamaulipas, Mexico. Am Antiq 13:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS (1961) First Annual Report of the tehuacan archaeological-botanical project. Publication of the Robert S, Peabody Foundation for Archaeology Phillips Academy, Andover, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS (1962) Second Annual Report of the tehuacan archaeological-botanical project. Publication of the Robert S, Peabody Foundation for Archaeology Phillips Academy, Andover, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS (2001a) Mesoamerican Chronology. In Oxford Encyclopedia of Mesoamerican Cultures. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS, Eubanks MW (2000) Comparative analysis of the Río Balsas and Tehuacán models for the origin of maize. Lat Am Antiq 11(1):3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC (1948) The role of pod corn in the origin and evolution of maize. Ann Missouri Bot Gard 35:377–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC (1974) Corn: its origin evolution and improvement. The Belknap Press of Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC (1986) The origin of corn. Sci Am 255:80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC, Reeves RG (1931) Hybridization of maize, tripsacum, and euchlaena. J Hered 22:329–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC, Reeves RG (1938) The origin of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 24:303–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC, Reeves RG (1939) The origin of Indian corn and its relatives. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Bulletin No. 547 College Station, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC, Reeves RG (1959a) The origin of corn. I. Pod corn, the ancestral form. Bot Mus Lealf Harv Univ 18:329–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC, Galinat WC (1964) The tunicate locus in maize dissected and reconstituted. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 51:147–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf PC, MacNeish RS, Galinat WC (1967) Prehistoric wild and cultivated maize. In: Byers DS (ed) The prehistory of the Tehuacán valley, vol 1, Environment and Subsistence. University of Texas Press, Austin, pp 178–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson RG (2003) The Spread of Maize Agriculture into the U.S. Southwest. In: Bellwood P, Renfrew C (eds) Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, pp 341–356

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka Y, Vigouroux Y, Goodman MM, Sanchez J, Buckler E, Doebley J (2002) A single domestication for maize shown by multilocus microsatellite genotyping. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6080–6084

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock B (1960) Chromosome constitutions of Mexican and Guatemalan races of maize. Carnegie Inst Wash Year B 59:461–472

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock B (1976) Significance of chromosome constitutions in tracing the origin and migration of races of maize in the Americas. In: Walden DW (ed) Maize Breeding and Genetics. Wiley, New York, pp 159–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Meggers BJ, Evans C Jr, Estrada VE (1965) Early formative of Coastal Ecuador: the valdivia and machalilla phases. Smithsonian Contributions in Anthropology, vol. 1. Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrick H (1904) The book of corn; a complete treatise upon the culture, marketing and uses of maize in America and elsewhere, for farmers, dealers, manufacturers and others--a comprehensive manual upon the production, sale, use and commerce of the world’s greatest crop. O. Judd Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsom LA (2006) Caribbean maize: first farmers to Columbus. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 325–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall DM (1978) Phytolith analyses of archaeological soils: Evidence of maize cultivation in Formative Ecuador. Science 199:177–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall DM (2003) Plant food resources of the ecuadorian formative: an overview and comparison to the central andes. In: Raymond JS, Burger RL (eds) Archaeology of formative ecuador: a symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, 7 and 8 October 1995. Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, Washington D.C, pp 213–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearsall DM, Piperno DR (1990) Antiquity of maize cultivation in Ecuador: summary and reevaluation of the evidence. Am Antiq 55:324–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Perales H, Brush SB, Qualset C (2003a) Maize landraces of central Mexico: an altitudinal transect. Econ Bot 57:7–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Perales H, Benz B, Brush S (2005) Maize diversity and ethnolinguistic diversity in Chiapas, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:949–952

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno DR (1984) A comparison and differentiation of phytoliths from maize (Zea mays L.) and wild grasses: use of morphological criteria. Am Antiq 49:361–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno DR (1991) The status of phytolith analysis in the American tropics. J World Prehistory 5(2):155–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno DR (1999) The origins and development of food production in Pacific Panama. In: Blake M (ed) Pacific Latin America in prehistory: The evolution of Archaic and Formative cultures. Washington State University Press, Pullman, pp 123–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno DR, Flannery KV (2001) The earliest archaeological maize (Zea mays L.) from highland Mexico: new accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2101–2103

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno DR, Clarey KH, Cooke RG, Ranere AJ, Weiland D (1985) Preceramic maize in central Panama: Phytolith, Pollen evidence. Am Anthropol 87:871–878

    Google Scholar 

  • Piperno DR, Ranere AJ, Moreno JE, Iriarte J, Holst I, Lachniet M, Jones JG, Ranere AJ, Castanzo R (2007) Late Pleistocene and Holocene environmental history of the Iguala Valley, Central Balsas Watershed of Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11874–11881

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl MED, Piperno DR, Pope KO, Jones JG (2007) Microfossil evidence for pre-Columbian maize dispersals in the neotropics from San Andrés, Tabasco, Mexico. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:6870–6875

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope KO, Pohl M, Jones JG, Lentz DL, von Nagy C, Varga FJ, Quitmyer IR (2001) Origin and environmental settings of ancient agriculture in the Lowlands of Mesoamerica. Science 292:1370–1373

    Google Scholar 

  • Price TD (ed) (2000) Europe’s First Farmers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Provine WB (2004) Ernst Mayr: genetics and speciation. Genetics 167:1041–1046

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman A, Wong K, Jane J, Myers AM, James MG (1998) Characterization of SU1 isoamylase, a determinant of storage starch structure in maize. Plant Physiol 117:425–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey KD, Spielmann KA (2006) Protohistoric and contact period salinas pueblo maize: trend or departure. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 487–496

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez ER, Nicholson Calle GE, Anderson E, Brown WL (1960) Races of maize in Bolivia. National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Randolph L (1975) Contributions of the wild relatives of maize to evolutionary history to domesticated maize: a synthesis of divergent hypotheses I. Econ Bot 30:321–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin RL (2006) Siouan tribal contacts and dispersions evidenced in the terminology for maize and other cultigens. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 563–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Raven PH (2005) Transgenes in Mexican maize: desireability or inevitability. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13003–13004

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber EA, Evershed RP (2004) Identification of maize in absorbed organic residues: a cautionary tale. J Archaeol Sci 31:399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew C (2000) Towards a population prehistory of Europe. In: Renfrew C, Boyle K (eds) Archaeogenetics: DNA and the population history of Europe. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp 3–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards M (2003) The Neolithic invasion of Europe. Annu Rev Anthropol 32:135–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindos D (1984) The origins of agriculture; an evolutionary perspective. With forward by R.C. Dunnell. Academic, Orlando

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera MA (2006) Prehistoric maize from Northern Chile. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 403–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriquez MF, Aschero CA (2000) Archaeological evidence of Zea mays L. (POACEAE) in the Southern Argentinean Puna (Antofagasto de la Sierra, Catamarca). J Ethnobiol 27:256–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Rovner I (2004) On transparent blindfolds: comments on identifying maize in Neotropical sediments and soils using cob phytoliths. J Archaeol Sci 31:815–819

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage RF, Wedin DA, Meirong L (1999) The Biogeography of C4 Photosynthesis: Patterns and Controlling Factors. In: Sage RF, Monson RK (eds) C4 Plant Biology. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 313–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury JH (1848) Maize or Indian corn. Trans N Y Agric Soc 8:678–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandstrom AR (1991) Corn is our Blood: Cultural and Ethnic Identity in a contemporary Aztec Village. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler TE (2002) El Gigante Rock Shelter: archaic Mesoamerica and Transitions to Settled Life. Reports Submitted to FAMSI. www.famsi.org/reports/00071/index.html

  • Sevilla R (1994) Variation in modern Andean maize and its implications for prehistoric patterns. In: Johannessen S, Hastorf CA (eds) Corn & culture in the prehistoric new World. Westview Press, Boulde, pp 219–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Service ER (1975) Origins of the state and civilization: the process of cultural evolution. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons AH (1986) New evidence for the use of early cultigens in the American Southwest. Am Antiq 51(1):73–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Smalley J, Blake TM (2003) Sweet beginnings: stalk sugar and the domestication of maize. Curr Anthropol 44(5):675–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (1997a) The initial domestication of Curcurbita pepo in the Americas 10, 000 years ago. Science 276:932–934

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (1997b) Reconsidering the Ocampo caves and the era of incipient cultivation in Mesoamerica. Lat Am Antiq 8:342–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (1998) The emergence of agriculture. Scientific American Library Publication. W. H. Freedman and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (2000) Guilá Naquitz revisited: agricultural origins in Oaxaca, Mexico. In: Fienman G, Manzanilla L (eds) Cultural evolution, contemporary viewpoints. Plenum Press, New York, pp 15–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (2001) Documenting plant domestication: the consilience of biological and archaeological approaches. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:1324–1326

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (2005a) Reassessing Coxcatlan cave and the early history of domesticated plants in Mesoamerica. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9438–9944

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (2005b) Low level food production and the Northwest Coast. In: Duer D, Turner N (eds) Traditions of plant use and cultivation in the Northwest Coast. University of Washington Press, Seattle, pp 37–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BD (2006) Documenting plants in the archaeological record. In: Zeder MA, Bradley DG, Emshwiller E, Smith BD (eds) Documenting domestication: new genetic and archaeological paradigms. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 15–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith CE Jr (1986) Preceramic plant remains from Guilá Naquitz. In: Flannery KV (ed) Guilá Naquitz: archaic foraging and early agriculture in Oaxaca. Academic, San Diego, CA, pp 265–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinden HJ (1917) The origin and distribution of agriculture in America. In: Proceedings of the19th International Congress of Americanists (1915), Washington DC, pp 269–276

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE (2001a) Reassessing the chronological and developmental relationships of the Formative of coastal Ecuador. J World Prehistory 15(2):193–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE (2003) An examination of the paleobotanical and chronological evidence for an early introduction of maize (Zea mays L.) into South America: a response to Pearsall. J Archaeol Sci 30(3):373–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE (2004) Domesticación vs. Domesticando: Revaluando los Componentes Primarios del “Formativo” en el Centro & NO Sudamérica. Revista Arqueologia del Area Intermedia 6:51–82. Instituto Colombiano de Antropologia e Historia, & Sociedad Colombiana de Arqueología. Bogotá, Colombia

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE (2005) La agricultura de la irrigación en el Período Formativo del desierto de Atacama. In: Rivera MA (ed.) Arqueología del Desierto de Atacama, Chile: La Etapa Formativa en el Area de Ramaditas/Guatecondo, Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Bolivarana. Chile, pp 89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE (2006a) An introduction to the histories of maize. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp xxi–xxv

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE, Thompson RG (2000) Reconsiderando la Introdución del Maíz en el Occidente de America del Sur. Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Etudes Andines 30(1):123–156. Lima

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE, Thompson RG (2002) A multidisciplinary approach to understanding the initial introduction of maize into coastal Ecuador. J Archaeol Sci 29(1):33–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) (2006) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiner MC (2001) Thirty years on the “broad spectrum revolution” and Paleolithic demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6993–6996

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuessey TF (1990) Plant Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swadesh M (1951) Diffusional cumulation and archaic residue as historical explanations. Southwest J Anthropol 7:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Swadesh M (1959a) Linguistics as an instrument of prehistory. Southwest J Anthropol l5:20-35

    Google Scholar 

  • Swadesh M (1959b) Mapas de Clasificación Lingüística de México y las Américas. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico D.F

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagg MD (1996) Early cultigens from fresnal shelter, Southeastern New Mexico. Am Antiq 61(2):311–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbert L, Doebley J, Larson S, Chandler V (1990) The ancestry of Tripsacum andersonii is a natural hybrid involving Zea and Tripsacum: molecular evidence. Am J Bot 77:722–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, McCouch SR (1997) Seed banks and molecular maps: unlocking genetic potential from the wild. Science 277:1063–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell JE, Hart J, Barut S, Cellinese N, Curet A, Denham T, Kusimba C, Latinis K, Oka R, Palka J, Pohl M, Pope K, Williams P, Haines H, Staller JE (2003) Domesticated landscapes: the subsistence ecology of plant and animal domestication. J Archaeol Method Theor 10(4):323–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J (1993) Discourse, totalisation and the ‘Neolithic’. In: C.H. Tilley (ed.) Interpretative archaeology. Berg, London, pp. 357–394

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson JA (2007) Seeds for the future: the impact of genetically modified crops on the environment. Comstock Publication, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson RG (2006) Documenting the presence of maize in central and south america through phytolith analysis of food residues. In: Zeder MA, Bradley DG, Emshwiller E, Smith BD (eds) Documenting domestication: new genetic and archaeological paradigms. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 82–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Timothy D, Bertulfo Pena VH, Ramirez ER (1961) Races of maize in Chile. In: collaboration with William L. Brown and Edgar Anderson. National Academy of Sciences-National Research Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuxill J, Reyes LA, Latournerie L, Cob V, Jarvis DI (2009) All maize is not equal: maize variety choices and mayan foodways in Rural Yucatan, Mexico. In: Staller JE, Carrasco MD (eds) Pre-Columbian foodways: interdisciplinary approaches to food, culture and markets in Mesoamerica. Springer, New York, pp 466–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykot RH (2006) Stable isotope analysis and human diet. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 131–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Tykot RH, Staller JE (2002) On the importance of early maize agriculture in coastal Ecuador: new data from the Late Valdivia Phase site of La Emerenciana. Curr Anthropol 43(4):666–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor EB (1889) Anthropology: an introduction to the study of man and civilization. Appleton and Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavilov NI (ed) (1926) Centers of origin of cultivated plants. In: Origin and geography of cultivated plants, translated by Doris Löve. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierra BJ, Ford RI (2006) Early maize agriculture in the Río Grande Valley, New Mexico. In: Staller JE, Tykot RH, Benz BF (eds) Histories of Maize: Multidisciplinary approaches to the prehistory, linguistics, biogeography, domestication, and evolution of maize. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, pp 497–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigouroux Y, McMullen M, Hittinger CT, Houchins K, Schulz L, Kresovich S, Matsouka Y, Doebley J (2002) Identifying genes of agronomic importance in maize by screening microsatellites for evidence of selection during domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99(15):9650–9655

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigouroux Y, Matsuoka Y, Doebley J (2003) Directional evolution for microsatellite size in maize. Mol Biol Evol 20(9):1480–1483

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace HA, Brown WL (1956) Corn and its early fathers. The Michigan State University Press, Kalamazoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang RI, Stec J, Hey J, Lukens L, Doebley J (1999) The limits of selection during maize domestication. Nature 398:236–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson S (1891) Contributions to American Botany, 3 Upon a wild species of Zea from Mexico. Proc Am Acad Arts Sci 26:108–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherwax P (1954) Indian corn in Old America. MacMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellhausen EJ, Roberts LM, Hernandez X E (1952) Races of maize in Mexico; their origin, characteristics and distribution. In: collaboration with Paul C. Mangelsdorf. Bussey Institution of Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitt SR, Wilson LM, Tenaillon MI, Gaut BS, Buckler ES IV (2002) Genetic diversity and selection in the maize starch pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12595–12562

    Google Scholar 

  • Whorf BL (1954) Language, meaning, and maturity. Harper and Bros, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes HG (1967) Teosinte: the closest relative of maize. Harvard University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey GR (1964) An introduction to North American ARchaeology, vol 1, North America. Prentice-Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey GR, Sabloff JA (1980) A history of American archaeology. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills WH (1988) Early prehistoric agriculture in the American Southwest. School of American Research, Santa Fe

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson DJ (1981) Of maize and men; a critique of the maritime hypothesis of state origins on the Coast of Peru. Am Anthropol 83:93–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright SI, Vroh Bi I, Schroeder SI, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, Mullen MD, Gaut BS (2005) The effects of artificial selection on the maize genome. Science 308:1310–1314

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarrillo S, Pearsall DM, Raymond JS, Tisdale MA, Quon DJ (2008) Directly dated starch residues document early formative maize (Zea mays L.) in tropical Ecuador. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(13):5006–5011

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeder MA, Emshwiller E, Smith BD, Bradley DG (2006) Documenting domestication: the intersection of genetics and archaeology. Trends Genet 22:139–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D (1996) The mode of domestication of the founder crops of Southwest Asian agriculture. In: Harris DR (ed) The origins and spread of agriculture and pastoralism in Eurasia. UCL Press, London, pp 142–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D (2004) Unconscious selection and the evolution of domesticated plants. Econ Bot 58:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohary D, Hopf M (1993) Domestication of Plants in the Old World, 2nd edn. Oxford, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Zvelebil M (2000) The social context of the agricultural transition in Europe. In: Renfrew C, Boyle K (eds) Archaeogenetics: DNA and the Population History of Europe. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Cambridge, pp 57–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John E. Staller .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Staller, J.E. (2010). Scientific, Botanical, and Biological Research on Maize. In: Maize Cobs and Cultures: History of Zea mays L.. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04506-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics