Skip to main content

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

  • 3651 Accesses

Abstract

When make-to-order (MTO) manufacturers receive unpredictable custom orders, they face a common challenge: quick supplier selection of custom parts and components. This challenge becomes even more serious when the order’s customization level is high, the MTO’s committed delivery time is short, the desired service level is high, and the missing delivery time penalty is severe. This chapter considers an MTO manufacturer who produces a product consisting of several custom parts that cannot be pre-inventoried. To respond to the custom order quickly, the MTO manufacturer can follow the procedures in this chapter to allocate orders to each supplier for each custom part and calculate the associated replenishment cost as well as the probability of meeting the delivery date, using the suppliers’ jobs on hand, availability, process speed, and defective rate. For a given delivery time and service level, a replenishment cost frontier can be generated to provide a range of options to meet customer requirements. This innovative method can be further extended to the case when the delivery time is not fixed and the manufacturer needs to reduce its delivery time to win a customer bid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aissaoui N, Haouari M, Hassini E (2007) Supplier selection and order lot sizing modeling: a review. Comput Oper Res 34(12):3516–3540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookbinder JH, Noor AI (1985) Setting job-shop due dates with service-level constraints. J Oper Res Soc 36(11):1017–1026

    Google Scholar 

  • Cakravastia A, Nakamura N (2002) Model for negotiating the price and due date for a single order with multiple suppliers in a make-to-order environment. Int J Prod Res 40(14):3425–3440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakravastia A, Toha IS, Nakamura N (2002) A two-stage model for the design of supply chain networks. Int J Prod Econ 80(3):231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee S, Slotnick SA, Sobel MJ (2002) Delivery guarantees and the interdependence of marketing and operations. Prod Oper Manag 11(3):393–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boer L, Labro E, Morlacchi P (2001) A review of methods supporting supplier selection. Eur J Purch Supply Manag 7(2):75–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellaert NP (1991) Due date setting and production control. Int J Prod Econ 23(1–3):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I (1995) Single facility due date setting with multiple customer classes. Manag Sci 41(4):608–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duenyas I, Hopp WJ (1995) Quoting customer lead times. Manag Sci 41(1):43–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton FF, Moodie DR (1999) Pricing and lead time decisions for make-to-order firms with contingent orders. Eur J Oper Res 116(2):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hafsi M, Roland E (1999) Negotiating price/delivery date in a stochastic manufacturing environment. IIE Trans 31(3):255–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkoc M, Wu SD (2000) Competitive due-date coordination between marketing and manufacturing. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Conference Proceedings, Ann Arbor, MI, June 29–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopp WJ, Roof Sturgis ML (2000) Quoting manufacturing due dates subject to a service level constraint. IIE Trans 32(9):771–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayaraman V, Srivastava R, Benton WC (1999) Supplier selection and order quantity allocation: A comprehensive model. J Supply Chain Manag 35(2):50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskinocak P, Ravi R, Tayur S (2001) Scheduling and reliable lead-time quotation for orders with availability intervals and lead-time sensitive revenues. Manag Sci 47(2):264–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence SR (1994) Negotiating due dates between customers and producers. Int J Prod Econ 37(1):127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller PA, Kelle P (1998) Quantitative support for buyer-supplier negotiation in just-in-time purchasing. Int J Purch Mater Manag 34(2):25–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Moodie DR (1999) Demand management: The evaluation of price and due date negotiation strategy using simulation. Prod Oper Manag 8(2):151–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nandakumar P, Datar SM, Akella R (1993) Models for measuring and accounting for cost of conformance quality. Manag Sci 39(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin F, Robinson EP (2005) Information sharing and coordination in make-to-order supply chain. J Oper Manag 23(6):579–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • So KC, Song JS (1998) Price, delivery time guarantees, and capacity selection. Eur J Oper Res 111(1):28–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spearman ML, Zhang RQ (1999) Optimal lead time policies. Manag Sci 45(2):290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson WJ (2007) Operations management, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanapa B, Techanitisawad A (2005) Simultaneous price and due date settings for multiple customer classes. Eur J Oper Res 166(2):351–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber CA, Desai A (1996) Determination of path to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers. Eur J Oper Res 90(1):142–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber CA, Current JR, Desai A (1998) Non-cooperative negotiation strategies for vendor selection. Eur J Oper Res 108(1):208–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster S (2002) Dynamic pricing and lead-time policies for make-to-order systems. Decision Sci 33(4):579–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wein LM (1991) Due date setting and priority sequencing in a multiclass M/G/1 queue. Manag Sci 37(7):834–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng ZK (1999) Strategies for integrating lead time and customer-order decisions. IIE Trans 31(2):161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue JF, Wang MC (2004) Robust commit time decisions and bounds for measuring demand-side quality costs. Int J Syst Sci 35(11):649–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue J, Xia Y, Tran T, Chen B (2009) Using frontier portfolios to improve make-to-order operations. Prod Oper Manag 18(2):226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zipkin PH (2000) Foundations of inventory management. McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinfeng Yue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yue, J., Xia, Y., Tran, T., Chen, B. (2010). Supplier Selection in Make-to-Order Manufacturing. In: Cheng, T., Choi, TM. (eds) Innovative Quick Response Programs in Logistics and Supply Chain Management. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04313-0_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics