Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Concept Formation in Linguistic Ontologies

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Leveraging Semantic Technologies (ICCS 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5662))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 654 Accesses

Abstract

Problems of conceptualization in linguistic ontologies are discussed We show that it is necessary to form concepts of a linguistic ontology as close as possible to the meanings of linguistic units, because excessive generalization and clustering of meanings necessarily lead to distortions in the system of relations, excessive problems in a specific subject field, or an application. At the same time it is important to ensure that concepts can be distinguished from superconcepts and sibling concepts. The usage of really existing multiword expressions helps us mitigate these contradictory requirements. The introduction of concepts on the basis of multiword expressions does not change the essence of a linguistic ontology, but also makes the distinction between the concepts much clearer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Staab, S., Studer, R.: Handbook on Ontologies. Birkhäuser, Basel (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Nirenburg, S., Wilks, Y.: What’s in a symbol: Ontology, representation, and language. J. of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence. 13(1), 9–23 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Nirenburg, S., Raskin, V.: Ontological Semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lenat, D., Miller, G., Yokoi, T.: CYC, WordNet, and EDR: critiques and responses. Communications of the ACM 38(11), 45–48 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilks, Y.: The Semantic Web as the apotheosis of annotation, but what are its semantics? IEEE Intelligent Systems 23(3), 41–49 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brewster, C., Iria, J., Ciravegna, F., Wilks, Y.: The Ontology: Chimaera or Pegasus. In: Dagstuhl Seminar Machine Learning for the Semantic Web, pp. 89–101 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tsujii, J., Ananiadou, S.: Thesaurus or logical ontology, which one do we need for text mining? In: Language Resources and Evaluation. Springer Science and Business Media B.V., vol. 39(1), pp. 77–90 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gene Ontology, http://www.geneontology.org/

  9. Magnini, B., Speranza, M.: Merging Global and Specialized Linguistic Ontologies. In: Proceedings of OntoLex 2002, pp. 43–48 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gomez-Perez, A., Fernandez-Lopez, M., Corcho, O.: OntoWeb. Technical Roadmap. D.1.1.2. - IST project IST-2000-29243 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sowa, J.: Building, Sharing and Merging Ontologies, http://www.jfsowa.com/ontology/ontoshar.htm

  12. Miller, G., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., Miller, K.: Five papers on WordNet. CSL Report 43, Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Loukachevitch, N., Dobrov, B.V.: Development and Use of Thesaurus of Russian Language RuThes. In: Proceedings of workshop on WordNet Structures and Standartisation, and How These Affect WordNet Applications and Evaluation, Gran Canaria, Spain, pp. 65–70 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Noy, N.F., McGuinness, D.: Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems Laboratory Technical Report KSL-01-05 and Stanford Medical Informatics Technical Report SMI-2001-0880 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bouaud, J., Bachimont, B., Charlet, J., Zweigenbaum, P.: Methodological principles for structuring an “ontology”. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 1995 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Miller, G., Hristea, F.: WordNet Nouns: Classes and Instances. J. Computational linguistics 32(1), 1–3 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Guarino, N.: Some Ontological Principles for Designing Upper Level Lexical Resources. In: Proceedings of First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Granada, Spain, pp. 28–30 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Climent, S., Rodriguez, H., Gonzalo, J.: Definitions of the links and subsets for nouns of the EuroWordNet project. Deliverable D005, WP3.1, EurWordNet, LE2-4003 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Welty, C., McGuinness, D., Uschold, M., Gruninger, M., Lehmann, F.: Ontologies: Expert Systems all over again. In: AAAI 1999 Invited Panel Presentation (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. ISO 2788-1986 - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Z39.19 – Guidelines for the Construction, Format and Management of Monolingual Thesauri. NISO (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Soergel, D., Lauser, B., Liang, A., Fisseha, F., Keizer, J., Katz, S.: Reengineering Thesauri for New Applications: the AGROVOC Example. J. of Digital Information, Article No. 257 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chugur, I., Gonzalo, J., Verdejo, F.: Polysemy and sense proximity in the Senseval-2 Test Suite. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2002 Workshop on Word sense Disambigation:recent successes, pp. 32–39 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Agirre, E., Lacalle, L.O.: Clustering Wordnet word senses. In: Proceedings of RANLP 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. McCarthy, D.: Relating WordNet Senses for Word Sense Disambiguation. In: Proceedings of NACCL Workshop on Making Senses of Sense, pp. 17–24 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gonzalo, J.: Sense Proximity versus Sense Relations. In: Proceedings of International Wordnet Conference (GWC 2004), pp. 5–6 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Fellbaum, C., Miller, G.: Whither WordNet. Presentation of winners of Antonio Zampolli Award. LREC 2006 (2006), http://www.lrec-conf.org/lrec2006/article.php3?id_article=45

  28. Landes, S., Leacock, C., Tengi, R.I.: Building semantic concordances. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hovy, E.: Methodologies for the Reliable Construction of Ontological Knowledge. In: Dau, F., Mugnier, M.-L., Stumme, G. (eds.) ICCS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3596, pp. 91–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Hirst, G.: Ontology and the Lexicon. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems, pp. 209–230. Springer, Berlin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Edmonds, P., Hirst, G.: Reconciling fine grained lexical knowledge and coarse-grained ontologies in representation of near-synonyms. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Semantic Approximation, Granularity and Vagueness, pp. 12–22 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  32. LIV (Legislative Indexing Vocabulary). Congressional Research Service. The Library of Congress. Twenty-first Edition (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: A Formal Ontology of Properties. In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS, vol. 1937, pp. 97–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N.: Social roles and their descriptions. In: Dubois, D., Welty, C., Williams, M.A. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, Proceedings of the Ninth International conference KR 2004, pp. 267–277. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Loukachevitch, N.V., Dobrov, B.V.: Development of Ontologies with Minimal Set of Conceptual Relations. In: Lino, M.T., Xavier, M.F., Ferreira, F., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, vol. 6, pp. 1889–1892 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Loukachevitch, N.V., Dobrov, B.V.: Ontological Types of Association Relations in Information Retrieval Thesauri and Automatic Query Expansion. In: Oltramari, et al. (eds.) Proceedings of OntoLex 2004: Ontologies and Lexical Resources in Distributed Environments, pp. 24–29 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Loukachevitch, N., Dobrov, B.: Sociopolitical Domain as a Bridge from General Words to Terms of Specific Domains. In: Proceedings of Second International WordNet Conference GWC, pp. 163–168 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Priss, U.: Linguistic Applications of Formal Concept Analysis. In: Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626, pp. 149–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Kuznetsov, S., Obiedkov, S., Roth, C.: Reducing the Representation Complexity of Lattice-Based Taxonomies. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds.) ICCS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4604, pp. 241–254. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Cimiano, P., Stumme, G., Hotho, A., Tane, J.: Conceptual Knowledge Processing with Formal Concept Analysis and Ontologies. In: Eklund, P. (ed.) ICFCA 2004. LNCS, vol. 2961, pp. 189–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Computing Center of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University (NIVC MGU), Leninskiye Gory 1, building 4, NIVC MGU, Moscow, 119991, Russia

    Natalia Loukachevitch

Authors
  1. Natalia Loukachevitch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut AIFB, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), 76128, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Sebastian Rudolph

  2. SAP Research Center CEC Dresden, Chemnitzer Strasse 48, 01187, Dresden, Germany

    Frithjof Dau

  3. Higher School of Economics, Department of Applied Mathematics and Information Science, State University, Kirpichnaya 33/5, 105679, Moscow, Russia

    Sergei O. Kuznetsov

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loukachevitch, N. (2009). Concept Formation in Linguistic Ontologies. In: Rudolph, S., Dau, F., Kuznetsov, S.O. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Leveraging Semantic Technologies. ICCS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5662. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03079-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03079-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-03078-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-03079-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation