Abstract
Numbers called quality modifiers are used to identify interval qualities: 0 numerically represents perfect, 1/2 represents major, –1/2 represents minor, and so on. These modifiers are linked with diatonic class intervals as ordered pairs that mimic common interval notation. For example, a minor third is represented by (–1/2, 2). A binary operator is constructed that allows these ordered pairs to be added consistent with our expectations. Similarly, accidental modifiers numerically identify the number of sharps or flats attached to a given note: 0 indicates no attached accidentals, negative integers indicate the number of flats attached, and positive integers indicate the number of sharps attached. These modifiers are linked with diatonic classes as ordered pairs that mimic common note names. For example, the note G\(\flat\) is represented by (–1,4) and Gx by (2,4). Intervals and notes represented by these ordered pairs are said to be in MD-notation (MD for modifier-diatonic). A group action and generalized interval system are defined for intervals and notes in MD-notation. An implied quartertone system is also discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Hook, J.: Enharmonic Systems: A Theory of Key Signatures, Enharmonic Equivalence, and Diatonicism. J. Math. Mus. 1, 99–120 (2007)
Clough, J., Douthett, J.: Maximally Even Sets. J. Mus. Theory 35, 93–173 (1991)
Clough, J., Myerson, G.: Variety and Multiplicity in Diatonic Systems. J. Mus. Theory 29, 249–270 (1985)
Clough, J., Myerson, G.: Musical Scales and the Generalized Cycle of Fifths. Am. Math. Monthly 93, 695–701 (1986)
Brinkman, A.: A Binomial Representation of Pitch for Computer Processing of Musical Data. Mus. Theory Spectrum 8, 44–57 (1986)
Agmon, E.: A Mathematical Model of the Diatonic System. J. Mus. Theory 33, 1–25 (1989)
Dixon, J., Mortimer, B.: Permutation Groups. Springer, New York (1996)
Peck, R.: Generalized Commuting Groups (unpublished) (2006)
Lewin, D.: Generalized Musical Intervals and Transformations. Yale University Press, New Haven (1987)
Balzano, G.: The Group-Theoretic Description of 12-Fold and Microtonal Pitch Systems. Computer Mus. J. 4(4), 66–84 (1980)
Bohlen, H.: Tonstufen in der Duodezime. Acustica 39, 61–136 (1978)
Mathews, M., Pierce, J., Reeves, A., Roberts, L.: Theoretical and Experimental Explorations of the Bohlen-Pierce Scale. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 84, 1214–1222 (1988)
Zweifel, P.: Generalized Diatonic and Pentatonic Scales: A Group-Theoretic Approach. Perspectives New Mus. 34(1), 140–161 (1996)
Krantz, R., Douthett, J.: Construction and Interpretation of Equal-Tempered Scales Using Frequency Ratios, Maximally Even Sets, and P-Cycles. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107, 2725–2734 (2000)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Douthett, J., Hook, J. (2009). Formal Diatonic Intervallic Notation. In: Chew, E., Childs, A., Chuan, CH. (eds) Mathematics and Computation in Music. MCM 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 38. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02394-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02394-1_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02393-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02394-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)