Skip to main content

Investigating the Utility of Eye-Tracking Information on Affect and Reasoning for User Modeling

  • Conference paper
User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5535))

Abstract

We investigate the utility of an eye tracker for providing information on users’ affect and reasoning. To do so, we conducted a user study, results from which show that users’ pupillary responses differ significantly between positive and negative affective states. As far as reasoning is concerned, while our analysis shows that larger pupil size is associated with more constructive reasoning events, it also suggests that to disambiguate between different kinds of reasoning, additional information may be needed. Our results show that pupillary response is a promising non-invasive avenue for increasing user model bandwidth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. VanLehn, K.: Student modeling. Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 55–78 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klein, J., Moon, Y.: This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, results, and implications. Interacting with Computers 14, 119–140 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aleven, V., Koedinger, R.: An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based cognitive tutor. Cognitive Science 26(2), 147–179 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D’Mello, S.K., Picard, R.W., Graesser, A.C.: Towards an affect-sensitive autotutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(4), 53–61 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burleson, W.: Affective Learning Companions: Strategies for Empathetic Agents with Real-Time Multimodal Affective Sensing to Foster Meta-Cognitive Approaches to Learning, Motivation, and Perseverance. Ph.D thesis, MIT (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gluck, K., Anderson, J.: Cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems? In: Cognition and Instruction: Twenty-Five Years of Progress, pp. 227–262 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Qu, L., Johnson, L.: Detecting the learner’s motivational states in an interactive learning environment. In: 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 547–554 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Conati, C., Merten, C.: Eye-tracking for user modeling in exploratory learning environments: an empirical evaluation. Knowledge Based Systems 20(6), 557–574 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chi, M., Basssok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P., Glaser, R.: Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13, 145–182 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marshall, S.P.: Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine 78, 165–175 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Gerven, P.W.M., Paas, F., Van Merrinboer, J.J.G., Schmidt, H.G.: Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology 41(2), 167–174 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vo, M.L.H., Jacobs, A.M., Kuchinke, L., Hofmann, M., Conrad, M., Schacht, A., Hutzler, F.: The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: Introducing the pupil old/new effect. Psychophysiology 45(1), 130–140 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Partala, T., Surakka, V.: Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing. Int. Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(1-2), 185–198 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Iqbal, S., Zheng, X., Bailey, B.P.: Task-evoked pupillary response to mental workload in human-computer interaction. In: CHI 2004 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1477–1480 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schultheis, H., Jameson, A.: Load in adaptive hypermedia systems: Physiological and behavioral methods. In: Adaptive hypermedia. Interacting with Computers, pp. 225–234 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Conati, C., Muldner, K., Carenini, G.: From example studying to problem solving via tailored computer-based meta-cognitive scaffolding: Hypotheses and design. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning (TICL) 4(2), 139–190 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Muldner, K., Conati, C.: Evaluating a decision-theoretic approach to tailored example selection. In: IJCAI 2007, 20th International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 483–488 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. VanLehn, K.: Analogy events: How examples are used during problem solving. Cognitive Science 22(3), 347–388 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. VanLehn, K.: Rule-learning events in the acquisition of a complex skill: An evaluation of cascade. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 1(8), 71–125 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muldner, K.: Tailored Support for Analogical Problem Solving. Ph.D thesis, University of British Columbia (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dragon, T., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Burleson, W., el Kaliouby, R., Eydgahi, H.: Viewing Student Affect and Learning through Classroom Observation and Physical Sensors. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 29–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Ercisson, K., Simmon, H.: Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review 87(3), 215–250 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Craig, S., D’Mello, S., Witherspoon, A., Graesser, A.: Emote aloud during learning with autotutor: Applying the facial action coding system to cognitive-affective states during learning. Cognition and Emotion 22(5), 777–788 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van Gerven, P., Paas, F., Van Merrienboer, J., Schmidt, H.: Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging. Psychophysiology 41(2), 167–174 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cardinal, R., Aitken, M.: ANOVA for the Behavioural Sciences Researcher. Routledge, London (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mauss, I., Robinson, M.: Measures of emotion: A review. Cognition & Emotion 23(2), 209–237 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Levens, S., Phelps, E.: Emotion processing effects on interference resolution in working memory. Emotion 8(2), 267–280 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Muldner, K., Christopherson, R., Atkinson, R., Burleson, W. (2009). Investigating the Utility of Eye-Tracking Information on Affect and Reasoning for User Modeling. In: Houben, GJ., McCalla, G., Pianesi, F., Zancanaro, M. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5535. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02247-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02246-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02247-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics