Skip to main content

From State-of-the-Art Static Fleet Assignment to Flexible Stochastic Planning of the Future

  • Chapter
Algorithmics of Large and Complex Networks

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5515))

Abstract

Given a flight schedule, which is a set of non-stop flights, called legs, with specified departure and arrival times, and a set of aircraft types, called subfleets, the fleet assignment problem is to determine which aircraft type should fly each leg. The objective is to maximize the overall profit.

Usually, planners assume that precise input data are determininstically available at planning time. As a consequence, an important insufficiency of modern industrial plans, especially flight-plans, is their lack of robustness. Disruptions prevent from operating as planned before and induce high costs for trouble shooting.

One reason for the uncertainties in the data for fleet assignment is that this problem is part of a long row of optimization problems of an airline. Therefore, important restrictions of later steps like connection dependent ground times should be considered in the fleet assignment problem. We show how connection dependent ground times can be added to the fleet assignment problem and presents three optimization methods, varying in run time and solution quality, that can solve real-world problem instances with more than 6000 legs within minutes.

Moreover, real or believed non-determinism leads to inevitable uncertainties in input data. As a consequence, instead of a traditional plan, a flexible strategy which reacts on different relizations of the uncertain data is demanded. The Repair Game is a formalization of a planning task, and playing it performs disruption management and generates robust plans with the help of game tree search. We introduce the game and present experimental results of a feasibility study.

This work has been partially supported by the European Union within the 6th Framework Program under contract 001907 (DELIS) and the German Science Foundation (DFG), SFB 614 (Selbstoptimierende Systeme des Maschinenbaus) and SPP 1126 (Algorithmik großer und komplexer Netzwerke).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abara, J.: Applying integer linear programming to the fleet assignment problem. Interfaces 19(4), 20–28 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Althöfer, I.: Root evaluation errors: How they arise and propagate. ICCA Journal 11(3), 55–63 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ballard, B.W.: The *-minimax search procedure for trees containing chance nodes. Artificial Intelligence 21(3), 327–350 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnhart, C., Boland, N.L., Clarke, L.W., Shenoi, R.G.: Flight strings models for aircraft fleeting and routing. Technical report. MIT Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Belanger, N., Desaulniers, G., Soumis, F., Desrosiers, J., Lavigne, J.: Airline fleet assignment with homogeneity. Technical report, GERAD, Montréal (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Berge, M.A., Hopperstad, C.A.: Demand driven dispatch: A method for dynamic aircraft capacity assignment, models and algorithms. Operations Research 41(1), 153–168 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, L.W., Hane, C.A., Johnson, E.L., Nemhauser, G.L.: Maintenance and crew considerations in fleet assignment. Technical report (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desaulniers, G., Desrosiers, J., Dumas, Y., Solomon, M.M., Soumis, F.: Daily aircraft routing and scheduling. Management Science 43(6), 841–855 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrhoff, J., Grothklags, S., Lorenz, U.: Das Reparaturspiel als Formalisierung von Planung unter Zufallseinflüssen, angewendet in der Flugplanung. In: Proceedings of GOR conference: Entscheidungsunterstützende Systeme in Supply Chain Managment und Logistik, pp. 335–356. Physika-Verlag (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engell, S., Märkert, A., Sand, G., Schultz, R.: Production planning in a multiproduct batch plant under uncertainty. Preprint 495-2001, FB Mathematik, Gerhard-Mercator-Universität Duisburg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Feldmann, R., Mysliwietz, M., Monien, B.: Studying overheads in massively parallel min/max-tree evaluation. In: 6th ACM Annual symposium on parallel algorithms and architectures (SPAA 1994), pp. 94–104. ACM, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flemming, P.J., Wallace, J.J.: How not to lie with statistics: the correct way to summerize benchmark results. CACM 29(3), 218–221 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gertsbach, I., Gurevich, Y.: Constructing an optimal fleet for a transportation schedule. Transportation Science 11(1), 20–36 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Götz, S., Grothklags, S., Kliewer, G., Tschöke, S.: Solving the weekly fleet assignment problem for large airlines. In: MIC 1999, pp. 241–246 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gu, Z., Johnson, E.L., Nemhauser, G.L., Wang, Y.: Some properties of the fleet assignment problem. Operations Research Letters 15, 59–71 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Hane, C.A., Barnhart, C., Johnson, E.L., Marsten, R.E., Nemhauser, G.L., Sigismondi, G.: The fleet assignment problem: solving a large-scale integer program. Mathematical Programming 70, 211–232 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaindl, H., Scheucher, A.: The reason for the benefits of minmax search. In: Proc. of the 11th IJCAI, Detroit, MI, pp. 322–327 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kniker, T.S., Barnhart, C.: Shortcomings of the conventional fleet assignment model. Technical report. MIT, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knuth, D.E., Moore, R.W.: An analysis of alpha-beta pruning. Artificial Intelligence 6(4), 293–326 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Koenig, S., Furcy, D., Bauer, C.: Heuristic search-based replanning. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling, pp. 294–301 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kouvelis, P., Daniels, R.L., Vairaktarakis, G.: Robust scheduling of a two-machine flow shop with uncertain processing times. IIE Transactions 32(5), 421–432 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leon, V.J., Wu, S.D., Storer, R.h.: A game-theoretic control approach for job shops in the presence of disruptions. International Journal of Production Research 32(6), 1451–1476 (1994)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Nau, D.S.: Pathology on game trees revisited, and an alternative to minimaxing. Artificial Intelligence 21(1-2), 221–244 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Osman, I.H.: Metastrategy simulated annealing and tabu search algorithms for the vehicle routing problem. Annals of Operations Research 41, 421–451 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Games against nature. Journal of Computer and System Science 31, 288–301 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Radicke, U.-D.: Algorithmen für das Fleet Assignment von Flugplänen. Verlag Shaker (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Reinefeld, A.: An Improvement of the Scout Tree Search Algorithm. ICCA Journal 6(4), 4–14 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Römisch, W., Schultz, R.: Multistage stochastic integer programming: an introduction. In: Online Optimization of Large Scale Systems, pp. 581–600 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rosenberger, J.M., Schaefer, A.J., Goldsman, D., Johnson, E.L., Kleywegt, A.J., Nemhauser, G.L.: Simair: A stochastic model of airline operations. In: Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rushmeier, R.A., Kontogiorgis, S.A.: Advances in the optimization of airline fleet assignment. Transportation Science 31(2), 159–169 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Russel, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence, A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shannon, C.E.: Programming a computer for playing chess. Philosophical Magazine 41, 256–275 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma, D., Ahuja, R.K., Orlin, J.B.: Neighborhood search algorithms for the combined through-fleet assignment model. Talk at ISMP 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sosnowska, D.: Optimization of a simplified fleet assignment problem with metaheuristics: Simulated annealing and GRASP. In: Pardalos, P.M. (ed.) Approximation and Complexity in Numerical Optimization. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Subramanian, R., Sheff, R.P., Quillinan, J.D., Wiper, D.S., Marsten, R.E.: Coldstart: Fleet assignment at Delta Air Lines. Interfaces 24(1), 104–120 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Talluri, K.T.: Swapping applications in a daily airline fleet assignment. Transportation Science 30(3), 237–248 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grothklags, S., Lorenz, U., Monien, B. (2009). From State-of-the-Art Static Fleet Assignment to Flexible Stochastic Planning of the Future. In: Lerner, J., Wagner, D., Zweig, K.A. (eds) Algorithmics of Large and Complex Networks. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5515. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02094-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02094-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02093-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02094-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics