Skip to main content

How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary?

  • Conference paper
Research in Computational Molecular Biology (RECOMB 2009)

Abstract

Phylogenetic Bootstrapping (BS) is a standard technique for inferring confidence values on phylogenetic trees that is based on reconstructing many trees from minor variations of the input data, trees called replicates. BS is used with all phylogenetic reconstruction approaches, but we focus here on the most popular, Maximum Likelihood (ML). Because ML inference is so computationally demanding, it has proved too expensive to date to assess the impact of the number of replicates used in BS on the quality of the support values. For the same reason, a rather small number (typically 100) of BS replicates are computed in real-world studies. Stamatakis et al. recently introduced a BS algorithm that is 1–2 orders of magnitude faster than previous techniques, while yielding qualitatively comparable support values, making an experimental study possible.

In this paper, we propose stopping criteria, that is, thresholds computed at runtime to determine when enough replicates have been generated, and report on the first large-scale experimental study to assess the effect of the number of replicates on the quality of support values, including the performance of our proposed criteria. We run our tests on 17 diverse real-world DNA, single-gene as well as multi-gene, datasets, that include between 125 and 2,554 sequences. We find that our stopping criteria typically stop computations after 100–500 replicates (although the most conservative criterion may continue for several thousand replicates) while producing support values that correlate at better than 99.5% with the reference values on the best ML trees. Significantly, we also find that the stopping criteria can recommend very different numbers of replicates for different datasets of comparable sizes.

Our results are thus two-fold: (i) they give the first experimental assessment of the effect of the number of BS replicates on the quality of support values returned through bootstrapping; and (ii) they validate our proposals for stopping criteria. Practitioners will no longer have to enter a guess nor worry about the quality of support values; moreover, with most counts of replicates in the 100–500 range, robust BS under ML inference becomes computationally practical for most datasets. The complete test suite is available at http://lcbb.epfl.ch/BS.tar.bz2 and BS with our stopping criteria is included in RAxML 7.1.0.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrews, D.W.K., Buchinsky, M.: On the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions for Bootstrap Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Tests. Cowles Foundation Paper 1141R (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, D.W.K., Buchinsky, M.: A Three-Step Method for Choosing the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions. Econometrica 68(1), 23–51 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews, D.W.K., Buchinsky, M.: Evaluation of a Three-step Method for Choosing the Number of Bootstrap Repetitions. J. of Econometrics 103(1-2), 345–386 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Andrews, D.W.K., Buchinsky, M.: On The Number of Bootstrap Repetitions for BCa Confidence Intervals. Econometric Theory 18(4), 962–984 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brooks, S.P., Gelman, A.: General Methods for Monitoring Convergence of Iterative Simulations. J. of Computational and Graphical Statistics 7(4), 434–455 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davidson, A.C., Hinkley, D.V.: Bootstrap Methods and Their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Davidson, R., MacKinnon, J.G.: Bootstrap Tests: How Many Bootstraps? Econometric Reviews 19(1), 55–68 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Efron, B., Tibshirani, R.J.: An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Felsenstein, J.: Confidence Limits on Phylogenies: An Approach Using the Bootstrap. Evolution 39(4), 783–791 (1985)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gelman, A., Rubin, D.B.: Inference from Iterative Simulation using Multiple Sequences. Stat. Sci. 7, 457–511 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grimm, G.W., Renner, S.S., Stamatakis, A., Hemleben, V.: A Nuclear Ribosomal DNA Phylogeny of acer Inferred with Maximum Likelihood, Splits Graphs, and Motif Analyses of 606 Sequences. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 2, 279–294 (2006)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guindon, S., Gascuel, O.: A Simple, Fast, and Accurate Algorithm to Estimate Large Phylogenies by Maximum Likelihood. Sys. Biol. 52(5), 696–704 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo, W., Peddada, S.: Adaptive Choice of the Number of Bootstrap Samples in Large Scale Multiple Testing. Stat. Appls. in Genetics and Mol. Biol. 7(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hall, P.: On the Number of Bootstrap Simulations Required to Construct a Confidence Interval. The Annals of Statistics 14(4), 1453–1462 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hedges, S.B.: The Number of Replications Needed for Accurate Estimation of the Bootstrap P Value in Phylogenetic Studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 9(2), 366–369 (1992)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hillis, D.M., Heath, T.A., John, K.S.: Analysis and Visualization of Tree Space. Sys. Biol. 54(3), 471–482 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holmes, S.: Bootstrapping Phylogenies Statistical Science, 18(2), 241–255

    Google Scholar 

  18. Manly, B.F.J., et al.: Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Moret, B.M.E.: Large-scale Phylogenetic Reconstruction. In: Brown, J.R. (ed.) Comparative Genomics: Basic and Applied Research, pp. 29–48. CRC Press/Taylor & Francis (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mossel, E., Vigoda, E.: Limitations of Markov Chain Monte Carlo Algorithms for Bayesian Inference of Phylogeny. Ann. Appl. Probab. 16(4), 2215–2234 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nylander, J.A.A., Wilgenbusch, J.C., Warren, D.L., Swofford, D.L.: AWTY (are we there yet?): A System for Graphical Exploration of MCMC Convergence in Bayesian Phylogenetics. Bioinformatics (2007) (advance access, published August 30)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pattengale, N.D., Gottlieb, E.J., Moret, B.M.E.: Efficiently Computing the Robinson-Foulds Metric. J. of Computational Biology 14(6), 724–735 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.: Tracer MCMC Trace Analysis Tool version 1.3 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robinson, D.F., Foulds, L.R.: Comparison of Weighted Labelled Trees. Lecture Notes in Mathematics 748, 119–126 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robinson, D.F., Foulds, L.R.: Comparison of Phylogenetic Trees. Math. Biosc. 53(1), 131–147 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ronquist, F., Huelsenbeck, J.P.: MrBayes 3: Bayesian Phylogenetic Inference under Mixed Models. Bioinformatics 19(12), 1572–1574 (2003)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Soltis, D.E., Gitzendanner, M.A., Soltis, P.S.: A 567-taxon Data Set for Angiosperms: The Challenges Posed by Bayesian Analyses of Large Data Sets. Int’l J. Plant Sci. 168(2), 137–157 (2007)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Soltis, D.E., Soltis, P.S.: Applying the Bootstrap in Phylogeny Reconstruction. Statist. Sci. 18(2), 256–267 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stamatakis, A.: RAxML-VI-HPC: Maximum Likelihood-based Phylogenetic Analyses with Thousands of Taxa and Mixed Models. Bioinformatics 22(21), 2688–2690 (2006)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stamatakis, A., Hoover, P., Rougemont, J.: A Rapid Bootstrap Algorithm for the RAxML Web Servers. Sys. Biol. (2008) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stamatakis, A., Meier, H., Ludwig, T.: New Fast and Accurate Heuristics for Inference of Large Phylogenetic Trees. In: Proc. of IPDPS 2004, HICOMB Workshop, Proceedings on CD, Santa Fe, New Mexico (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Whelan, S.: New Approaches to Phylogenetic Tree Search and Their Application to Large Numbers of Protein Alignments. Sys. Biol. 56(5), 727–740 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zwickl, D.: Genetic Algorithm Approaches for the Phylogenetic Analysis of Large Biological Sequence Datasets under the Maximum Likelihood Criterion. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin (April 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pattengale, N.D., Alipour, M., Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Moret, B.M.E., Stamatakis, A. (2009). How Many Bootstrap Replicates Are Necessary?. In: Batzoglou, S. (eds) Research in Computational Molecular Biology. RECOMB 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02008-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02007-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02008-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics