Summary
This chapter begins by describing a universally recurring socio-cultural “game” of inter-group competition for control of resources. It next describes efforts to author software agents able to play the game as real humans would - which suggests the ability to study alternative ways to influence them, observe PMESII effects, and potentially understand how best to alter the outcomes of potential conflict situations. These agents are unscripted, but use their decision making to react to events as they unfold and to plan out responses. For each agent, a software called PMFserv operates its perception and runs its physiology and personality/value system to determine fatigue and hunger, injuries and related stressors, grievances, tension buildup, impact of rumors and speech acts, emotions, and various collective and individual action decisions. The chapter wraps up with a correspondence test from a SE Asian ethnic conflict, the results of which indicate significant correlation between real and agentbased outcomes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bharathy, G. K. (2006) Agent Based Human behavior Modeling: A Knowledge Engineering Based Systems Methodology for Integrating of Social Science Frameworks for Modeling Agents with Cognition, Personality & Culture. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, July 2006)
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon.
De Marchi, S. (2005). Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, J., Steinbruner, J. D., Parker, M. T. (2001), Modeling civil violence: An agent-based computational approach. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Washington DC: Brookings (CSED WP#20).
Green, K. C. (2002). Forecasting decisions in conflict situations: a comparison of game theory, role-paying, and unaided judgement. International Journal of Forecasting, 18, 321–344.
Hermann, M. G. (1999). Assessing Leadership Style: A Trait Analysis. Hilliard, OH: Social Sci. Automation, Inc.
Heuer, R. J., Jr. (1999). Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency.
House, R. J. Hanges, P. J., Javidan M, et al. (2004), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Johns, M., Silverman, B. G. (2001). How emotion and personality effect the utility of alternative decisions: A terrorist target selection case study.Proceedings of the 10th CGF & BR, SISO. Norfolk, Virginia.
Johns, M. (2006) Deception and Trust in Complex Semi-Competitive Environments. Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Maoz, I., Eidelson, R. J. (2007). Psychological bases of extreme policy preferences: How the personal beliefs of Israeli Jews predict their support for population transfer in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1476–1497.
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., Collins, A. (1988). The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pew, R. W., Mavor, A. S. (1998). Modeling Human and Organizational Behavior: Application to Military Simulation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., Weaver, R., O’Brien, K., Silverman, R. (2002a). Human behavior models for game-theoretic agents. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2(3/4), 273–301.
Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., O’Brien, K., Weaver, R., Cornwell, J. (2002b). Constructing virtual asymmetric opponents from data and models in the literature: Case of crowd rioting. Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Orlando, Florida, 97–106.
Silverman, B. G. (2005). Human performance simulation. In J. Ness, D. Ritzer, V. Tepe (Eds.), The Science and Simulation of Human Performance (Chapter 9). New York: Elsevier.
Silverman, B. G., Rees, R, et al. (2005, May), Athena’s prism: A diplomatic strategy role playing game for generating ideas and exploring alternatives. Proceedings of the Internat’l Conference on Intelligence Analysis, MacLean, VA: Mitre.
Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., Cornwell, J., O’Brien, K. (2006a). Human behavior models for agents in simulators and games: Part I enabling science with PMFserv. Presence , v. 15: 2 April.
Silverman, B. G., Bharathy, G.K., O’Brien, K., Cornwell, J. (2006b). Human behavior models for agents in simulators and games: Part II gamebot engineering with PMFserv. Presence, v. 15: 2, April.
Silverman, B. G., Bharathy, G. K., Johns, M., Nye, B., Eidelson, R., Smith, T., Socio-Cultural Games for Training and Analysis. Tech Report avail from the authors (submitted for publication 2006c).
Wood, E. J. (2003). Modeling Robust Settlements to Civil War: Indivisible Stakes and Distributional Compromises. Santa Fe, Unpublished Paper. Available from the author: wood@santafe.edu
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silverman, B.G., Bharathy, G.K., Nye, B.D. (2009). Gaming and Simulating Ethno-Political Conflicts. In: Argamon, S., Howard, N. (eds) Computational Methods for Counterterrorism. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01141-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01141-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01140-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01141-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)