Abstract
In this paper, we compare two product design approaches, quality function deployment (QFD) and conjoint analysis (CA), on the example of mobile phones for elderly people as a target group. Then, we compare between our results and the results from former similar comparisons, e.g., Pullman et al. (J Prod Innov Manage 19(5):354–364, 2002) and Katz (J Innov Manage 21:61–63, 2004). In this work, the same procedures and conditions are taken into consideration as that taken by Pullman et al. in their paper. They viewed the relation between the two methods: QFD and CA as a complementary one in which both should be simultaneously implemented since each provide feedback to the other. They concluded that CA is more efficient in reflecting the end-users’ present preferences for the product attributes, whereas QFD is definitely better in satisfying end-users’ needs from the developers’ point of view. Katz in his response from a practitioner’s point of view agreed with Pullman et al. However, he concluded that the two methods are better used sequentially and that QFD should precede conjoint analysis. We test these results in a market for elderly people.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baier, D. (1998). Conjointanalytische Lösungsansätze zur Parametrisierung des house of quality. In: VDI-GSP (Ed.),QFD – Produkte und Dienstleistungen marktgerecht gestalten. Düsseldorf: VDI-Verlag.
Baier, D., & Brusch, M. (2005). Linking quality function deployment and conjoint analysis for new product design. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organisation, 29, 189–198.
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1993). The voice of the customer. Marketing Science, 12, 1–27.
Katz, G. M. (2004). Practitioner note: A response to Pullman et al.’s (2002): Comparison of quality function deployment versus conjoint analysis. The Journal of Innovation Management, 21, 61–63.
Kazemzadeh, R. B., Behzadian, M., Aghdasi, M., & Albadvi, A. (2009). Integration of marketing research techniques into house of quality and product family design. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 41(9–10), 1019–1033.
Pullman, M. E., Moore, W. L., & Wardell, D. G. (2002). A comparison of quality function deployment and conjoint analysis in new product design. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(5), 354–364.
Sawtooth Software. (2002). ACA system adaptive conjoint analysis version 2.0.1. Evanston, IL: Author.
Sullivan, L. P. (1986). Qualtiy function deployment. Quality Progress, 19(6), 39–50.
Terninko, J. (1997). Step-by-step QFD : Customer-driven product design. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abu-Assab, S., Baier, D. (2009). Designing Products Using Quality Function Deployment and Conjoint Analysis: A Comparison in a Market for Elderly People. In: Fink, A., Lausen, B., Seidel, W., Ultsch, A. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01044-6_47
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01044-6_47
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01043-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01044-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)