Skip to main content

Strengths and Weaknesses of Ant Colony Clustering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence
  • 2947 Accesses

Abstract

Ant colony clustering (ACC) is a promising nature-inspired technique where stochastic agents perform the task of clustering high-dimensional data on a low-dimensional output space. Most ACC methods are derivatives of the approach proposed by Lumer and Faieta. These methods usually perform poorly in terms of topographic mapping and cluster formation. In particular when compared to clustering on Emergent Self-Organizing Maps (ESOM). In order to address this issue, a unifying representation for ACC methods and Emergent Self-Organizing Maps is derived in a brief yet formal manner. ACC terms are related to corresponding mechanisms of the Self-Organizing Map. This leads to insights on both algorithms. ACC are considered as first-degree relatives of the ESOM. This explains benefits and shortcomings of ACC and ESOM. Furthermore, the proposed unification allows to judge whether modifications improve an algorithm’s clustering abilities or not. This is demonstrated using a set of cardinal clustering problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aranha, C., & Iba, H. (2006). The effect of using evolutionary algorithms on ant clustering techniques. In The Long Pham, Hai Khoi Le, & Xuan Hoai Nguyen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Asian-Pacific workshop on Genetic Programming (pp. 24–34). Military Technical Academy, Hanoi, VietNam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. In Annals of eugenics, 7, Part II (pp. 179–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundamental Clustering Problem Suite. (n.d.). http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb12/datenbionik/data.

  • Goodhill, G. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). Quantifying neighbourhood preservation in topographic mappings, In Proceedings of 3rd Joint Symposium on Neural Computation. California Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handl, J., Knowles, J., & Dorigo, M. (2006). Ant-based clustering and topographic mapping. Artificial Life, 12(1), 35–61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohonen, T. (1995). Self-organizing maps. Springer Series in Information Sciences (Vol. 30). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumer, E., & Faieta, B. (1994). Diversity and adaption in populations of clustering ants. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour: From Animals to Animats 3 (pp. 501–508). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nybo, K., Venna, J., & Kaski, S. (2007). The self-organizing map as a visual neighbor retrieval method. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps (WSOM 2007). Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, S. C., Ting, K. M., & Teng, S. W. (2006). Reproducing the results of ant-based clustering without using ants. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultsch, A., & Herrmann, L. (2006). Automatic Clustering with U*C (Technical report). Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps-University of Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ultsch, A., & Mörchen, F. (2006). U-maps: Topograpic visualization techniques for projections of high dimensional data. In Proceedings of 29th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society (GfKl 2006). Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutz Herrmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Herrmann, L., Ultsch, A. (2009). Strengths and Weaknesses of Ant Colony Clustering. In: Fink, A., Lausen, B., Seidel, W., Ultsch, A. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01044-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics