Abstract
Ant colony clustering (ACC) is a promising nature-inspired technique where stochastic agents perform the task of clustering high-dimensional data on a low-dimensional output space. Most ACC methods are derivatives of the approach proposed by Lumer and Faieta. These methods usually perform poorly in terms of topographic mapping and cluster formation. In particular when compared to clustering on Emergent Self-Organizing Maps (ESOM). In order to address this issue, a unifying representation for ACC methods and Emergent Self-Organizing Maps is derived in a brief yet formal manner. ACC terms are related to corresponding mechanisms of the Self-Organizing Map. This leads to insights on both algorithms. ACC are considered as first-degree relatives of the ESOM. This explains benefits and shortcomings of ACC and ESOM. Furthermore, the proposed unification allows to judge whether modifications improve an algorithm’s clustering abilities or not. This is demonstrated using a set of cardinal clustering problems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aranha, C., & Iba, H. (2006). The effect of using evolutionary algorithms on ant clustering techniques. In The Long Pham, Hai Khoi Le, & Xuan Hoai Nguyen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Asian-Pacific workshop on Genetic Programming (pp. 24–34). Military Technical Academy, Hanoi, VietNam.
Fisher, R. A. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. In Annals of eugenics, 7, Part II (pp. 179–188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fundamental Clustering Problem Suite. (n.d.). http://www.uni-marburg.de/fb12/datenbionik/data.
Goodhill, G. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). Quantifying neighbourhood preservation in topographic mappings, In Proceedings of 3rd Joint Symposium on Neural Computation. California Institute of Technology.
Handl, J., Knowles, J., & Dorigo, M. (2006). Ant-based clustering and topographic mapping. Artificial Life, 12(1), 35–61. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kohonen, T. (1995). Self-organizing maps. Springer Series in Information Sciences (Vol. 30). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.
Lumer, E., & Faieta, B. (1994). Diversity and adaption in populations of clustering ants. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behaviour: From Animals to Animats 3 (pp. 501–508). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nybo, K., Venna, J., & Kaski, S. (2007). The self-organizing map as a visual neighbor retrieval method. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps (WSOM 2007). Bielefeld.
Tan, S. C., Ting, K. M., & Teng, S. W. (2006). Reproducing the results of ant-based clustering without using ants. In IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.
Ultsch, A., & Herrmann, L. (2006). Automatic Clustering with U*C (Technical report). Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Philipps-University of Marburg.
Ultsch, A., & Mörchen, F. (2006). U-maps: Topograpic visualization techniques for projections of high dimensional data. In Proceedings of 29th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society (GfKl 2006). Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Herrmann, L., Ultsch, A. (2009). Strengths and Weaknesses of Ant Colony Clustering. In: Fink, A., Lausen, B., Seidel, W., Ultsch, A. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01044-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01044-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-01043-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-01044-6
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)