Skip to main content

Stand Structure and Spatial Patterns of Trees in Mixed Hyrcanian Beech Forest, Iran

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Survival and Sustainability

Part of the book series: Environmental Earth Sciences ((EESCI))

  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

The mixed beech forests (Fagus orientalis) are the most important industrial forests with the highest degree of naturalness in Hyrcanian forest, Iran. These forests commonly dominate by shade tolerance species with irregular uneven age stand structure. The aim of this study was to analyze the stand structure and spatial pattern in order to identify specific structural patterns. We investigated the stand structure and spatial pattern of trees in mixed Beech forest in the Shastkolate Educational Forest to examine the coexistence strategies of different species. Data was collected from an 16 ha permanent plot on an 400 × 400 m quadrate area that divided to 64 micro-quadrate (50 × 50 m). We mapped all stems >7.5 cm in diameter at breast height (dbh) on permanent plot. The stand contained nine woody plant species and 4,901 living stems with a combined basal area of 32.8 m2 ha−1. The density of living trees >7.5 cm dbh averaged 291.7 ha−1. The six main species were divided into two groups based on density and stand structure. Group A (F. orientalis, Carpinus betulus and Parrotia persica) had higher density than group B, as well as reverse J or L-shaped dbh distribution of live stems. Species in group B (Alnus subcordata, Acer velutinum and Diospurus lotus) had bell-shaped dbh distributions. Species in group A have clump spatial distribution pattern in all layers but clump intensity is more than in under storey layer and size of patch clump is small in this group. This phenomenon for group A may explaining by having numerous coppice, sucker and patch regeneration in the under storey layer. Middle storey and under storey stems of the six major tree species were patchily distributed throughout the plot but for Alder and Maple species common pattern in canopy layer was complete spatial randomness. The distribution of Beech and Hornbeam trees were negatively associated with other species. These results suggest species differences in favorable canopy condition. Differences in life history strategies and site preferences may explain the coexistence of these species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Akashi N (1996) The spatial pattern and canopy-understory association of trees in a cool temperate, mixed forest in western Japan. Ecol Res 11:311–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen TFH, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological diversity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asadollahi F (2001) Study of Hyrcanian plant association in north Iranian forest. 1st national conference of north forest management and sustainable development, Ramsar, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes BV (1998) Forest ecology. Wiley, New York. 773 pp

    Google Scholar 

  5. Busing R (1991) A spatial model of forest dynamics. Vegetatio 92:167–179

    Google Scholar 

  6. Busing RT, White PS (1993) Effects of area on old-growth forest attributes: importance for the equilibrium landscape concept. Landscape Ecol 8:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (1994) Causes of soil nutrient heterogeneity at different scales. In Caldwell MM, Pearcy RW (eds) Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants. Academic Press, Boston, MA, pp 255–282

    Google Scholar 

  8. Collins SL, Klahr SC (1991) Tree dispersion in oak-dominated forests along an environmental gradient. Oecologia 86(4):471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark PJ, Evans FC (1954) Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Denslow JS (1980) Gap partitioning among tropical rainforest trees. Biotropica 12:47–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ehrenfeld JG, Han X, Parsons WFJ, Zhu W (1997) On the nature of environmental gradients: temporal and spatial variability of soils and vegetation in the New Jersey Pinelands. J Ecol 85:785–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Franklin J, Michaelsen J, Strahler AH (1985) Spatial analysis of density dependent pattern in coniferous forest stands. Vegetation 64:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gross KL, Pregitzer KS, Burton AJ (1995) Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. J Ecol 83:357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Habashi H, Hosseini SM, Mohajer M (2004) The importance of necromass in virgin oriental beech forests (Mazandaran, Iran). 7th IUFRO international beech symposium, Tehran, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  15. Habashi H, Mahmoudi J (2005) The ecological importance of dead trees in virgin oriental beech forests (Mazandaran, Iran). 10th European ecological congress, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  16. Halvorson JJ, Bolton H Jr, Smith JL, Rossi RE (1994) Geostatistical analysis of resource islands under Artemisia tridentata in the shrub-steppe. Great Basin Nat 54:313–328

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoshino D, Nishimura N, Yamamoto S. (2001) Age, size structure and spatial patterns of major tree species in an old growth Chamaecyparis obusa forest, central Japan. For Ecol Manage 152:31–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson RB, Caldwell MM (1993) Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual plants. J Ecol 81:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kashian DM, Barnes BV, Walker WS (2003) Ecological species groups of landform level ecosystems dominated by jack pine in northern lower Michigan, USA. Plant Ecol 166:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kenkel NC (1988) Pattern of self-thinning in jack pine: testing the random mortality hypothesis. Ecology 69(4):1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kenel NC, Hoskins JA, Hoskins WD (1989) Local competition in naturally established jack pine stand. Can J Bot 67:2630–2635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leibundgut H (1993) Europäische Urwälder. Haupt Bern, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  23. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maguire D, Batista JLF, McKenzie D (1993) Horizontal structure of uneven-aged mixed species forests modeled as an inhomogeneous poisson process. In: Reynolds K (ed) Proceedings IUFRO S4.11 Conference on stochastic spatial models in forestry, University of Greenwich, Thessaloniki, Greece, pp 163–170

    Google Scholar 

  25. Manabe T, Yamamoto S (1997) Spatial distribution of Eurya japonica in an old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest, SW Japan. J Veg Sci 8:761–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Manabe T, Nishimura N, Miura M, Yamamoto S (2000) Population structure and spatial patterns for trees in a temperate old-growth evergreen broad-leaved forest in Japan. Plant Ecol 151:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller RE, Ver Hoef JM, Fowler NL (1995) Spatial heterogeneity in eight central Texas grasslands. J Ecol 83:919–928

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell A, Arnott J (1995) Effects of shade on the morphology and physiology of amabilis fir and western hemlock seedlings. New Forests 10(1):79–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohajer MM (2005) Silviculture. Tehran University Press, Tehran, p 387

    Google Scholar 

  30. Morisita M (1959a) Measuring of the dispersion of individuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Mem Fac Sci Kyushu Univ Ser E 2:215–235

    Google Scholar 

  31. Morisita M (1959b) Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities. Mem Fac Sci Kyushu Univ Ser E 3:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nakashizuka T (1999) Structure, dynamics and disturbance regime of temperate broad-leaved forests in Japan. J Veg Sci 10:805–814

    Google Scholar 

  33. Oheimb G, Westphal C, Tempel H, Härdtle W (2005) Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) (Serrahn, North-east Germany). For Ecol Manage 212:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (1995) Landscape ecology: spatial heterogeneity in ecological systems. Science 269:331–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Rademacher C, Neuert C, Grundmann V, Wissel C, Grimm V (2004) Reconstructing spatiotemporal dynamics of Central European natural beech forests: the rule-based forest model before. For Ecol Manage 194:349–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson, D., Van Vuuren MMI (1998) Responses of wild plants to nutrient patches in relation to growth rate and life-form. In: Lambers H, Poorter H (eds) Inherent variation in plant growth. Physiological mechanisms and ecological consequences. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 237–257

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robertson GP, Crum JR, Ellis BG (1993) The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance. Oecologia 96:451–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saniga M, Schütz J-P (2001) Dynamics of changes in dead wood share in selected beech virgin forests in Slovakia within their development cycle. J For Sci 47:557–565

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sinclair DF (1985) On tests of spatial randomness using mean nearest neighbour distance. Ecology 66:1084–1085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Skarpe C (1991) Spatial patterns and dynamics of woody vegetation in an arid savanna. J Veg Sci 2:565–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Szwagrzyk J, Czerwczak M (1993) Spatial pattern of trees in natural forests of East-Central Europe. J Veg Sci 4:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor AH, Qin Z (1988) Regeneration patterns in old-growth Abies–Betula forests in the Wolong natural reserve, Sichuam, China. J Ecol 76:1204–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Trangmar BB, Yost RS, Wade MK, Uehara G, Sudjadi M (1987) Spatial variation of soil properties and rice yield on recently cleared land. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 51:668–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Urban DL, O’Neill RV, Shugart HH (1987) Landscape ecology. BioScience 37:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Webster R, Oliver MA (1992) Sample adequately to estimate variograms of soil properties. J Soil Sci 43:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Welden C, Slauson W, Ward R (1990) Spatial pattern and interference in PinÄon-Juniper woodlands of northwest Colorado. Great Basin Nat 50(4):313–319

    Google Scholar 

  47. West PW (1984) Inter-tree competition and small-scale pattern in monoculture of Eucalyptus obilqua L’Herit. Austr J Ecol 9:405–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank numerous institutions and persons for their contribution of the study: Educational Shastkolate forest, Gorgan University. Shaban Shataii, Habib Zare, Gholamreza Daneshvar, Alireza Aliarab, Mohamad Hadi Moayeri and Mr Mirzaii.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Habashi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Habashi, H., Hosseini, S., Rahmani, R., Mohammadi, J. (2010). Stand Structure and Spatial Patterns of Trees in Mixed Hyrcanian Beech Forest, Iran. In: Gökçekus, H., Türker, U., LaMoreaux, J. (eds) Survival and Sustainability. Environmental Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95991-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics