Skip to main content

Equivalences in Answer-Set Programming by Countermodels in the Logic of Here-and-There

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming (ICLP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5366))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In Answer-Set Programming different notions of equivalence, such as the prominent notions of strong and uniform equivalence, have been studied and characterized by various selections of models in the logic of Here-and-There (HT). For uniform equivalence however, correct characterizations in terms of HT-models can only be obtained for finite theories, respectively programs. In this paper, we show that a selection of countermodels in HT captures uniform equivalence also for infinite theories. This result is turned into coherent characterizations of the different notions of equivalence by countermodels, as well as by a mixture of HT-models and countermodels (so-called equivalence interpretations), which are lifted to first-order theories under a very general semantics given in terms of a quantified version of HT. We show that countermodels exhibit expedient properties like a simplified treatment of extended signatures, and provide further results for non-ground logic programs. In particular, uniform equivalence coincides under open and ordinary answer-set semantics, and for finite non-ground programs under these semantics, also the usual characterization of uniform equivalence in terms of maximal and total HT-models of the grounding is correct, even for infinite domains, when corresponding ground programs are infinite.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baral, C.: Knowledge Representation, Reasoning and Declarative Problem Solving. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Leone, N., Pfeifer, G., Faber, W., Eiter, T., Gottlob, G., Perri, S., Scarcello, F.: The DLV system for knowledge representation and reasoning. ACM TOCL 7(3), 499–562 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I.: GnT - A solver for disjunctive logic programs. In: Lifschitz, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) LPNMR 2004. LNCS, vol. 2923, pp. 331–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Lin, F., Zhao, Y.: ASSAT: Computing answer sets of a logic program by SAT solvers. Artif. Intell. 157(1-2), 115–137 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Gebser, M., Kaufmann, B., Neumann, A., Schaub, T.: clasp: A conflict-driven answer set solver. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4483, pp. 260–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: Classical Negation in Logic Programs and Disjunctive Databases. New Generation Computing 9, 365–385 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferraris, P., Lee, J., Lifschitz, V.: A new perspective on stable models. In: Veloso, M.M. (ed.) IJCAI 2007, pp. 372–379 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heymans, S., Nieuwenborgh, D.V., Vermeir, D.: Open answer set programming for the semantic web. J. Applied Logic 5(1), 144–169 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Heymans, S., de Bruijn, J., Predoiu, L., Feier, C., Nieuwenborgh, D.V.: Guarded hybrid knowledge bases. CoRR abs/0711.2155 (2008) (to appear in TPLP)

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Bruijn, J., Pearce, D., Polleres, A., Valverde, A.: Quantified equilibrium logic and hybrid rules. In: Marchiori, M., Pan, J.Z., de Sainte Marie, C. (eds.) RR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4524, pp. 58–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Quantified equilibrium logic an the first order logic of here-and-there. Technical Report MA-06-02, Univ. Rey Juan Carlos (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., Woltran, S.: Strong and Uniform Equivalence in Answer-Set Programming: Characterizations and Complexity Results for the Non-Ground Case. In: Veloso, M.M., Kambhampati, S. (eds.) AAAI 2005, pp. 695–700. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lifschitz, V., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: A characterization of strong equivalence for logic programs with variables. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4483, pp. 188–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Woltran, S.: A common view on strong, uniform, and other notions of equivalence in answer-set programming. TPLP 8(2), 217–234 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Faber, W., Konczak, K.: Strong order equivalence. AMAI 47(1-2), 43–78 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Inoue, K., Sakama, C.: Equivalence of logic programs under updates. In: Alferes, J.J., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3229, pp. 174–186. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Eiter, T., Fink, M., Tompits, H., Traxler, P., Woltran, S.: Replacements in non-ground answer-set programming. In: Doherty, P., Mylopoulos, J., Welty, C.A. (eds.) KR 2006, pp. 340–351. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lin, F., Chen, Y.: Discovering classes of strongly equivalent logic programs. JAIR 28, 431–451 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Janhunen, T., Oikarinen, E., Tompits, H., Woltran, S.: Modularity aspects of disjunctive stable models. In: Baral, C., Brewka, G., Schlipf, J. (eds.) LPNMR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4483, pp. 175–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Eiter, T., Fink, M., Woltran, S.: Semantical characterizations and complexity of equivalences in answer set programming. ACM TOCL 8(3) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Uniform equivalence for equilibrium logic and logic programs. In: Lifschitz, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) LPNMR 2004. LNCS, vol. 2923, pp. 194–206. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Cabalar, P., Ferraris, P.: Propositional theories are strongly equivalent to logic programs. TPLP 7(6), 745–759 (2007)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Cabalar, P., Pearce, D., Valverde, A.: Minimal logic programs. In: Dahl, V., Niemelä, I. (eds.) ICLP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4670, pp. 104–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Oetsch, J., Tompits, H., Woltran, S.: Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored: Relativised uniform equivalence with answer-set projection. In: AAAI, pp. 458–464. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fink, M. (2008). Equivalences in Answer-Set Programming by Countermodels in the Logic of Here-and-There. In: Garcia de la Banda, M., Pontelli, E. (eds) Logic Programming. ICLP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5366. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89982-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89982-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89981-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89982-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics