Skip to main content

Error-Induced Learning as a Resource-Adaptive Process in Young and Elderly Individuals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Resource-Adaptive Cognitive Processes

Part of the book series: Cognitive Technologies ((COGTECH))

Abstract

Thorndike described in his law of effect [44] that actions followed by positive events are more likely to be repeated in the future, whereas actions that are followed by negative outcomes are less likely to be repeated. This implies that behavior is evaluated in the light of its potential consequences, and non-reward events (i.e., errors) must be detected for reinforcement learning to take place. In short, humans have to monitor their performance in order to detect and correct errors, and this allows them to successfully adapt their behavior to changing environmental demands and acquire new behavior, i.e., to learn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäckman, L., Ginovart, N., Dixon, R.A., Robins Wahlin, T.-B., Wahlin, Å., Halldin, C., Farde, L. Age-related cognitive deficits mediated by changes in the striatal dopamine system. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157:635–637 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bäckman, L., Nyberg, L., Lindenberger, U., Li, S.C., Farde, L. The correlative triad among aging, dopamine, and cognition: Current status and future prospects. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30:791–807 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger, B., Gaspar, P., Verney, C. Dopaminergic innervation of the Cerebral Cortex: Unexpected differences between rodents and primates. Trends in Neurosciences, 14:21–27 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein, P.S., Scheffers, M.K., Coles, M.G.H. “Where did I go wrong?” A psychophysiological analysis of error detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21:1312–1322 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Berry, D.C. Implicit learning: Twenty-five years on. A tutorial. In C. Umilta, M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV: Conscious and Nonconscious Information Processing (pp. 755–782). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Botwinick, J. Aging and Behavior. New York: Springer (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cerella, J. Aging and information-processing rate. In J.E. Birren, K.W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the Psychology of Aging (pp. 201–221). San Diego: Academic Press (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cherry, K.E., Stadler, M.A. Implicit learning of a nonverbal sequence in younger and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 10:379–394 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., Boyer, M. Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2:406–416 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Craik, F.I.M., Bialystok, E. Cognition through the lifespan: Mechanisms of change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10:131–138 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Curran, T. On the neural mechanisms of sequence learning. Psyche [On-line serial], 2(12), Available at URL: http://psyche.csse.monash.edu.au/v2/psyche-2–12-curran.html, (2006).

  12. Destrebecqz, A., Cleeremans, A. Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8:343–350 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Eimer, M., Goschke, T., Schlaghecken, F., Stürmer, B. Explicit and implicit learning of event sequences: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22:970–987 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Engle, R.W. Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11:19–23 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eppinger, B., Kray, J., Mock, B., Mecklinger, A. Better or worse than expected? Aging, learning, and the ERN. Neuropsychologia, 46:521–539 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoorman, J., Blanke, L. Effects of errors in choice reaction tasks on the ERP under focused and divided attention. In C.H.M. Brunia, A.W.K. Gaillard, A. Kok (Eds.), Psychophysiological Brain Research (pp. 192–195). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Falkenstein, M., Hoorman, J., Hohnsbein, J. Changes of error-related ERPs with age. Experimental Brain Research, 138:258–262 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferdinand, N.K., Mecklinger, A., Kray, J. Error and deviance processing in implicit and explicit sequence learning. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20:629–642 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Frensch, P.A. One concept, multiple meanings. On how to define the concept of implicit learning. In M.A. Stadler, P.A. Frensch, (Eds.), Handbook of Implicit Learning (pp. 47–104). Thousand Oaks: Sage (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gehring, W.J., Goss, B., Coles, M.G.H., Meyer, D.E., Donchin, E. A neural system for error detection and compensation. Psychological Science, 4:385–390 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hajcak, G., Moser, J.S., Yeung, N., Simons, R.F. On the ERN and the significance of errors. Psychophysiology, 42:151–160 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Harrington, D.L., Haaland, K.Y. Skill learning in the elderly: Diminished implicit and explicit memory for a motor sequence. Psychology and Aging, 7:425–432 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hedden, T., Gabrieli, J.D.E. Insights into the aging mind: A view from cognitive neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5:87–97 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holroyd, C.B. A note on the oddball N200 and the feedback ERN. In M. Ullsperger, M. Falkenstein (Eds.), Errors, Conflict and the Brain. Current Opinions on Performance Monitoring (pp. 211–218). Dresden: Sächsisches Digitaldruck Zentrum GmbH (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holroyd, C.B., Coles, M.G. The neural basis of human error processing: Reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109:679–709 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Howard, D.V., Howard, J.H., Jr. Age differences in learning serial patterns: Direct versus indirect measures. Psychology and Aging, 4:357–364 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Howard, D.V., Howard, J.H., Jr. Adult age differences in the rate of learning serial patterns: Evidence from direct and indirect tests. Psychology and Aging, 7:232–241 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kliegl, R., Mayr, U., Krampe, R.Th. Time-accuracy functions for determining process and person differences: An application to cognitive aging. Cognitive Psychology, 26:134–164 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kopp, B., Wolff, M. Brain mechanisms of selective learning: Event-related potentials provide evidence for error-driven learning in humans. Biological Psychology, 51:223–246 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kray, J., Lindenberger, U. Adult age differences in task switching. Psychology and Aging, 15:126–147 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kray, J., Lindenberger, U. Fluide intelligenz. In J. Brandtstädter, U. Lindenberger (Hrsg.), Entwicklungspsychologie der Lebensspanne. Ein Lehrbuch (S. 194–220). Stuttgart, Germany: Kohlhammer Verlag (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lindenberger, U., Kray, J. Kognitive Entwicklung. In S.-H. Filipp, U.M. Staudinger (Eds.), Entwicklungspsychologie des mittleren und höheren Erwachsenenalters (pp. 299–341). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe Verlag (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Miltner, W.H.R., Braun, C.H., Coles, M.G.H. Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a “generic” neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9:788–798 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A. ERP correlates of true and false recognition after different retention delays: Stimulus- and response-related processes. Psychophysiology, 40:146–159 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nieuwenhuis, S., Ridderinkhof, K.R., Talsma, D., Coles, M.G.H., Holroyd, C.B., Kok, A., van der Molen, M.W. A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2(1):19–36 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nieuwenhuis, S., Yeung, N., van den Wildenberg, W., Ridderinkhof, K.R. Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulated function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 3:17–26 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nissen, M.J., Bullemer, P. Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19:1–32 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Reber, A.S. Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118:219–235 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rüsseler, J., Hennighausen, E., Münte, T.F., Rösler, F. Differences in incidental and intentional learning of sensorimotor sequences as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 15:116–126 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rüsseler, J., Kuhlicke, D., Münte, T.F. Human error monitoring during implicit and explicit learning of a sensorimotor sequence. Neuroscience Research, 47:233–240 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Schultz, W. Getting formal with dopamine and reward. Neuron, 36:241–263 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Schultz, W., Dayan, P., Montague, P.R. A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science, 275:1593–1599 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Seger, C.A. Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin, 115:163–196 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Thorndike, E.L. Laws and hypotheses for behavior. In E.L. Thorndike (Ed.), Animal Intelligence (pp. 241–281). Darien, CT: Hafner Publishing Co. (1970) (Original work published 1911).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Turner, M.L., Engle, R.W. Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language, 28:127–154 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ullsperger, M., von Cramon, D.Y. Subprocesses of performance monitoring: A dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event-related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage, 14:1387–1401 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Volkow, N.D., Logan, J., Fowler, J.S., Wang, G.-J., Gur, R.C., Wong, C., Felder, C., Gatley, S.J., Ding, Y.-S., Hitzemann, R., Pappas, N. Association between age-related decline in brain dopamine activity and impairment in frontal and cingulated metabolism. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157:75–80 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Wechsler, W. Handanweisung zum Hamburg-Wechsler-Intelligenztest für Erwachsene (HAWIE) [Manual for the Hamburg-Wechsler intelligence test for adults]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant SFB 378, EM 2). We wish to thank Anita Althausen and Martina Hubo for their support during data collection and Ben Eppinger for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola K. Ferdinand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ferdinand, N.K., Weiten, A., Mecklinger, A., Kray, J. (2010). Error-Induced Learning as a Resource-Adaptive Process in Young and Elderly Individuals. In: Crocker, M., Siekmann, J. (eds) Resource-Adaptive Cognitive Processes. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89408-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89408-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-89407-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-89408-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics