Skip to main content

Understanding Uranium Migration in Hard Rocks

  • Chapter
Uranium, Mining and Hydrogeology

Abstract

Uranium is a major radioactive constituent of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. However, its migration behaviour in crystalline rocks is still inadequately understood. This paper describes the results of controlled laboratory migration experiments and attempts made to simulate them using numerical models. Initial models employing generic information in “blind predictions” are progressively enhanced by data-supported interpretation. Such an approach is intended to mimic the stages of a site assessment, where conceptual and numerical models are progressively refined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 389.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumann N, Arnold T, Geipel G, Trueman E, Black S, Read, D (2006). Detection of U(VI) on the surface of altered depleted uranium by TRLFS. Sci.. Tot Env. 366, 905-909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno J, Arcos D, Duro L (1999) Processes and features affecting the near field hydrochemistry. Groundwater-Bentonite interaction. SKB Tech. Rep. TR-99-29, 56 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finch R, Cooper M, Hawthorne F, Ewing R (1996) The crystal structure of schoepite [(UO2)8O2(OH)12](H2O)12. Canadian Mineral. 34: 1071-1088.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang J-H, Dempsey B, Burgos W (2006) Solubility of schoepite: Comparison and selection of complexation constants for U(VI). Water Res. 40(14): 2738-2746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst D, Appelo C (1999) User’s guide to PHREEQC–A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read D (1991) CHEMVAL Project: Testing of coupled chemical transport models. CEC Report EUR13675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (2006) Long-term safety for KBS-3 repositories at Forsmark and Laxemar - a first evaluation. Main report of the SR-Can project. Report SKB TR-06-09, 613 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman E, Black S, Read D, Hodson M (2003). Alteration of depleted uranium metal. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 67, A493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueman, E, Black S, Read D. (2004) Characterisation of depleted uranium (DU) from an unfired CHARM-3 penetrator. Sci. Tot. Env. 327, 337-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Falck, W.E., Read, D., Black, S., Thornley, D., Markovaara-Koivisto, M., Siitari-Kauppi, M. (2008). Understanding Uranium Migration in Hard Rocks. In: Merkel, B.J., Hasche-Berger, A. (eds) Uranium, Mining and Hydrogeology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87746-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics