Skip to main content

Releasing the Power of Digital Metadata: Examining Large Networks of Co-related Publications

  • Conference paper
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Bibliographic metadata plays a key role in scientific literature, not only to summarise and establish the facts of the publication record, but also to track citations between publications and hence to establish the impact of individual articles within the literature. Commercial secondary publishers have typically taken on the role of rekeying, mining and analysing this huge corpus of linked data, but as the primary literature has moved to the world of the digital repository, this task is now undertaken by new services such as Citeseer, Citebase or Google Scholar. As institutional and subject-based repositories proliferate and Open Access mandates increase, more of the literature will become openly available in well managed data islands containing a much greater amount of detailed bibliometric metadata in formats such as RDF. Through the use of efficient extraction and inference techniques, complex relations between data items can be established. In this paper we explain the importance of the co-relation in enabling new techniques to rate the impact of a paper or author within a large corpus of publications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pritchard, A.: Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation 25(4), 348–349 (1969)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Egghe, L., Rousseau, R.: Introduction to informetrics: quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Price, D.: Networks of scientific papers. Science 149, 510–515 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergstrom, C.: Eigenfactor: Measuring the value and prestige of scholarly journals

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garfield, E.: Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science 178(4060), 471–479 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kleinberg, J.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM) 46(5), 604–632 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Chakrabarti, S., Dom, B., Gibson, D., Kumar, S., Raghavan, P., Rajagopalan, S., Tomkins, A.: Experiments in topic distillation. In: ACM SIGIR Workshop on Hypertext Information Retrieval on the Web (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Page, C., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bring order to the web, pp. 1997–2007 (manuscript, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Computer and ISDN Systems 30(1-7), 107–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aksnes, D., Taxt, R.: Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a norwegian university. Research Evaluation 13(1), 33–41 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meho, L., Sonnenwald, D.: Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of kurdish scholarship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(2), 123–138 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Noruzi, A.: Google scholar: the new generation of citation indexes. Libri 55(4), 170–180 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scopus empowers researchers with new citation tracker. Reed Elsevier Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giles, C., Bollacker, K., Lawrence, S.: Citeseer: an automatic citation indexing system. In: Proceedings of the third ACM conference on Digital libraries, pp. 89–98 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moed, H.: Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures. Current Science 89(12), 1990–1996 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brody, T., Harnad, S.: Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57(8), 1060–1072 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Small, H.: Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24(4), 265–269 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard Donatella Castelli Bolette Ammitzbøll Jurik Joan Lippincott

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tarrant, D., Carr, L., Payne, T. (2008). Releasing the Power of Digital Metadata: Examining Large Networks of Co-related Publications. In: Christensen-Dalsgaard, B., Castelli, D., Ammitzbøll Jurik, B., Lippincott, J. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5173. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87599-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87599-4_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87598-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87599-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics