Skip to main content

Enhancing Library Services with Web 2.0 Functionalities

  • Conference paper
Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries (ECDL 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5173))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, a prototype of an Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) is presented. This new OPAC features new functionalities and utilizes web 2.0 technologies in order to deliver improved search and retrieval services. Some of these new services include social tag annotations, user opinions and ranks and tag-based similarity searches. The prototype is evaluated by a user group through questionnaires, interviews and with the system’s integrated logging mechanism. The results are encouraging enough and show that Library 2.0 technologies seem to be acceptable by the majority of the users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bisson, C.: WPopac: An OPAC 2.0 Testbed (2006), http://maisonbisson.com/blog/post/11133/

  2. Blyberg, J.: AADL.org Goes Social post to blyberg.net (2007), http://www.blyberg.net/2007/01/21/aadlorg-goes-social

  3. Breeding, M.: Next-Generation Library Catalogs. Library Technology Reports 43(4) (July/August 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Casey, M.: LibraryCrunch: bringing you a library 2.0 perspective (2006), http://www.librarycrunch.com/

  5. Chan, S.: Tagging and Searching – Serendipity and museum collection databases. In: Proceedings of Museums and the Web 2007, Toronto (2007), http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/chan/chan.html

  6. Fuhr, N., Tsakonas, G., Aalberg, T., Agosti, M., Hansen, P., Kapidakis, S., Klas, C.P., Kovacs, L., Landoni, M., Micsik, A., Papatheodorou, C., Peters, C., Solvberg, I.: Evaluation of digital libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries 8(1), 21–38 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Goh, D.H., Sepoetro, L.L., Qi, M., Ramakrishnan, R., Theng, Y.L., Puspitasari, F., Lim, E.P.: Mobile tagging and accessibility information sharing using a geospatial digital library. In: Goh, D.H.-L., Cao, T.H., Sølvberg, I.T., Rasmussen, E. (eds.) ICADL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4822, pp. 287–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Golder, S., Huberman, B.: Usage patterns of collaborative tagging systems. Journal of Information Science 32(2), 198–208 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hjørland, B.: Information seeking and subject representation: an activity – theoretical approach to information science. Greenwood Press, Westport (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jacso, P.: Clustering search results. Part II: search engines for highly structured databases. Online Information Review 31(2), 234–241 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lorcan, D.: The Library Catalogue in the New Discovery Environment: Some Thoughts. Ariadne 48 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maness, J.: Library 2.0 Theory: Web 2.0 and Its Implications for Libraries. Webology 3(2), Article 25 (2006), http://www.webology.ir/2006/v3n2/a25.html

  13. Mathes, A.: Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Report, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, Illinois Urbana-Champaign (2004), http://www.adammathes.com/academic/computer-mediated-communication/folksonomies.html

  14. McCulloch, E., MacGregor, G.: Collaborative Tagging as a Knowledge Organisation and Resource Discovery Tool. Library Review 55(5), 291–300 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reine, L.: 28% of online Americans have used the internet to tag content. Pew Internet and American Life Project, http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Tagging.pdf

  16. Spiteri, L.F.: Structure and form of folksonomy tags: The road to the public library catalogue. Webology 4(2) (2007), http://www.webology.ir/2007/v4n2/a41.html

  17. Sinclair, J., Cardew-Hall, M.: The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful? Journal of Information Science 34, 15–29 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsakonas, G., Papatheodorou, C.: Analyzing and evaluating usefulness and usability in electronic information services. Journal of Information Science 32(5), 400–419 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wyatt, N.: “Redefining RA” 2.0 for Readers: Online innovations reinvent how we use a classic RA tool—annotations. Library Journal (January 11, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Birte Christensen-Dalsgaard Donatella Castelli Bolette Ammitzbøll Jurik Joan Lippincott

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gavrilis, D., Kakali, C., Papatheodorou, C. (2008). Enhancing Library Services with Web 2.0 Functionalities. In: Christensen-Dalsgaard, B., Castelli, D., Ammitzbøll Jurik, B., Lippincott, J. (eds) Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. ECDL 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5173. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87599-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87599-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-87598-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-87599-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics