Skip to main content

A Map of Trust between Trading Partners

  • Conference paper
Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business (TrustBus 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 5185))

Abstract

A pair of ‘trust maps’ give a fine-grained view of an agent’s accumulated, time-discounted belief that the enactment of commitments by another agent will be in-line with what was promised, and that the observed agent will act in a way that respects the confidentiality of previously passed information. The structure of these maps is defined in terms of a categorisation of utterances and the ontology. Various summary measures are then applied to these maps to give a succinct view of trust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Reece, S., Rogers, A., Roberts, S., Jennings, N.R.: Rumours and reputation: Evaluating multi-dimensional trust within a decentralised reputation system. In: 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems AAMAS 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ramchurn, S., Huynh, T., Jennings, N.: Trust in multi-agent systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19, 1–25 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arcos, J.L., Esteva, M., Noriega, P., Rodríguez, J.A., Sierra, C.: Environment engineering for multiagent systems. Journal on Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intelligence Review 24, 33–60 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Artz, D., Gil, Y.: A survey of trust in computer science and the semantic web. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 5, 58–71 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Viljanen, L.: Towards an Ontology of Trust. In: Katsikas, S.K., López, J., Pernul, G. (eds.) TrustBus 2005. LNCS, vol. 3592, pp. 175–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huynh, T., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N.: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13, 119–154 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MacKay, D.: Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, N., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A., Parsons, S., Sierra, C., Wooldridge, M.: Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. International Journal of Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 199–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiation. Journal of Artificial Intelligence 142, 205–237 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kraus, S.: Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artificial Intelligence 94, 79–97 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Li, Y., Bandar, Z.A., McLean, D.: An approach for measuring semantic similarity between words using multiple information sources. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15, 871–882 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheeseman, P., Stutz, J.: On The Relationship between Bayesian and Maximum Entropy Inference. In: Bayesian Inference and Maximum Entropy Methods in Science and Engineering, pp. 445–461. American Institute of Physics, Melville (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paris, J.: Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese 117, 75–93 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: The LOGIC Negotiation Model. In: Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS 2007, Honolulu, Hawai’i (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sierra, C., Debenham, J.: Trust and honour in information-based agency. In: Stone, P., Weiss, G. (eds.) Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems AAMAS 2006, Hakodate, Japan, pp. 1225–1232. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Steven Furnell Sokratis K. Katsikas Antonio Lioy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debenham, J., Sierra, C. (2008). A Map of Trust between Trading Partners. In: Furnell, S., Katsikas, S.K., Lioy, A. (eds) Trust, Privacy and Security in Digital Business. TrustBus 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5185. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85735-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85735-8_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85734-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85735-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics