Skip to main content

Difficulties in the Interpretation of Chest Radiography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Interpretation of CT and Standard Radiography of the Chest

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Abstract

Reading chest X-rays is a difficult and challenging task, and is still important despite the development of powerful imaging techniques such as computed tomography, high-resolution computed tomography, and magnetic resonance. For a correct reading and interpretation of chest X-rays, it is necessary to understand the techniques, their limitations, basic anatomy and physiology, and to have a systematic system of scrutiny. However, we have to keep in mind that interpretation is submitted to perceptual and cognitive limitations and errors. In this chapter, chest X-ray will be discussed from prescription to report in all its facets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Armstrong P, Wilson AG, Dee P (1990) Imaging of diseases of the chest. Mosby – Year Book, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashizawa K, Hayashi K, Aso N et al (2001) Lobar atelectasis: diagnostic pitfalls on chest radiography. Br J Radiol 877:89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin JHM, Romney BM, Goldsmith LS (1992) Missed Bronchogenic-Carcinoma – radiographic findings in 27 patients with a potentially resectable lesion evident in retrospect. Radiology 1:115–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacher K, Smeets P, De Hauwere A et al (2006) Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection. Eur J Radiol 3:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball CG, Kirkpatrick AW, Laupland KB et al (2005) Factors related to the failure of radiographic recognition of occult posttraumatic pneumothoraces. Am J Surg 5:541–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berbaum KS, Franken EA Jr, Dorfman DD et al (1990) Satisfaction of search in diagnostic radiology. Invest Radiol 2:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogaert J, Verschakelen J (1995) Spiral CT of the diaphragm. J Belge Radiol 2:86–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton RM, Bush WR (1956) Recognition of forms against a complex background. J Opt Soc Am 9:758–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brogdon BG, Kelsey CA, Moseley RD Jr (1983) Factors affecting perception of pulmonary lesions. Radiol Clin North Am 4:633–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Busch HP (1997) Digital radiography for clinical applications. Euro Radiol 7(suppl 3):S66–S72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen JT (1983) The plain radiograph in the diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Radiol Clin North Am 4:609–621

    Google Scholar 

  • Difazio MC, MacMahon H, Xu XW et al (1997) Digital chest radiography: effect of temporal subtraction images on detection accuracy. Radiology 2:447–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Felson B (1973) Chest roentgenology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Florman S, Young B, Allmon JC et al (2001) Traumatic pneumothorax ex vacuo. J Trauma 1:147–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser RG, Paré JAP, Paré PD et al (1988) Diagnosis of diseases of the chest. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland LH, Coulson W, Wollin E (1963) The rate of growth and apparent duration of untreated primary bronchial carcinoma. Cancer 16:694–707

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hansell DM, Bankier AA, MacMahon H et al (2008) Fleischner society: glossary of terms for thoracic imaging. Radiology 3:697–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ishigaki T, Sakuma S, Horikawa Y et al (1986) One-shot dual-energy subtraction imaging. Radiology 1:271–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Krupinski EA (2003) The future of image perception in radiology: synergy between humans and computers. Acad Radiol 1:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kundel HL, Nodine CF (1983) A visual concept shapes image perception. Radiology 2:363–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundel HL, Nodine CF, Carmody D (1978) Visual scanning, pattern recognition and decision-making in pulmonary nodule detection. Invest Radiol 3:175–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucaya J, Gartner S, Garcia-Pena P et al (1998) Spectrum of manifestations of Swyer-James-MacLeod syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4:592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon H, Li F, Engelmann R et al (2008a) Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography. J Thorac Imaging 2:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMahon H, Li F, Engelmann R et al (2008b) Dual energy subtraction and temporal subtraction chest radiography. J Thorac Imaging 2:77–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams HP, Samei E, Dobbins J 3rd et al (2006) Recent advances in chest radiography. Radiology 3:663–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettler F, Ringertz H, Vañó E (2004) Managing patient dose in digital radiology: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1:1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers BF, McCabe CJ (1993) Traumatic diaphragmatic hernia Occult marker of serious injury. Ann Surg 6:783–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne EN (1993) Reading the chest radiograph. A physiologic appraoch. Mosby – Year Book, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  • Murfitt J (1993) The normal chest: methods of investigation and differential diagnosis. Churchill Livingstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitrosi A, Borasi G, Nicoli F et al (2007) A filmless radiology department in a full digital regional hospital: Quantitative evaluation of the increased quality and efficiency. J Digit Imaging 2:140–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novelline RA, Squire LF (1997) Squire’s fundamentals of radiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea FJ, Ziskin MC (1972) Visual system transfer function and optimal viewing distance for radiologists. Invest Radiol 3:147–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shephard CT (2003) Radiographic image production and manipulation. McGraw-Hill Columbus, Ohio

    Google Scholar 

  • Spratt JS Jr, Spjut HJ, Roper CL (1963) The frequency distribution of the rates of growth and the estimated duration of primary pulmonary carcinomas. Cancer 16:687–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Squire LF (1970) Exercises in diagnostic radiology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Stitik FP, Tockman MS (1978) Radiographic screening in the early detection of lung cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 3:347–366

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolberg HO, Patt NL, Macewen KF et al (1964) Hodgkin’s disease of the lung. Roentgenologic-pathologic correlation. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 92:96–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swallow RA, Naylor E, Roebuck EJ et al (1986) Clark’s positioning in radiography. Heinneman Medical Books, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsubamoto M, Johkoh T, Kozuka T et al (2002) Temporal subtraction for the detection of hazy pulmonary opacities on chest radiography. Am J Roentgenol 179(2): 467–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuddenham WJ (1963) Problems of perception in chest rontgenology: facts and fallacies. Radiol Clin North Am 1:277

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuddenham WJ (1984) Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society. AJR Am J Roentgenol 3:509–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Usuda K, Saito Y, Sagawa M et al (1994) Tumor doubling time and prognostic assessment of patients with primary lung cancer. Cancer 8:2239–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westra D (1990) Radiologic diagnosis of chest disease. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright FW (2002) Radiology of the chest and related conditions. Taylor and Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Louke Delrue .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Delrue, L., Gosselin, R., Ilsen, B., Van Landeghem, A., de Mey, J., Duyck, P. (2011). Difficulties in the Interpretation of Chest Radiography. In: Coche, E., Ghaye, B., de Mey, J., Duyck, P. (eds) Comparative Interpretation of CT and Standard Radiography of the Chest. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79942-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79942-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79941-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79942-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics