Skip to main content

Abstract

The European Commission proposes a common consolidated corporate tax base (CCCTB)1. The first step to a CCCTB is a harmonised tax base which replaces the different tax accounting rules of 27 member states. Given the harmonised tax base, the CCCTB is designed to replace separate entity accounting and the arm’s length standard with consolidation and formula apportionment of a European group’s profit. The Commission does not propose to harmonise the corporate income tax rate. The member states are still free to choose the corporate income tax rate. Thus, the Commission’s proposal rests on the source principle.

See Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee, Towards an Internal Market without tax obstacles, Brussels, COM (2001) 582 final; European Commission, Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base Working Group (CCCTB WG), Progress to date and future plans for the CCCTB, CCCTB\WP\046\doc\en, Brussels, 20 November 2006.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. See Mintz, J., Corporate Tax Harmonization in Europe: It’s All About Compliance, International Tax and Public Finance 2004, 221–234.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See McLure, C., The State Corporate Income Tax: Lambs in Wolves’ Clothing, in H. Aaron and M. Boslin (eds.), The Economics of State Taxation, 327–346.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Desai, M./Hines, J., Evaluating International Tax Reform, National Tax Journal 2003, 487–502.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Fuest, C./Hemmelgarn, T./Ramb, F., International Tax and Public Finance 2007, 627–648; the data are restricted to German multinationals and the estimation of the tax revenue effects does not take into account the tax planning responses of the companies.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Agúndez-Garcia, A., The Delineation and Apportionment of an EU Consolidated Tax Base for Multi-Jurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation: A Review of Issues and Options, Taxation Papers, working paper, 2006, 32 and Martens-Weiner, J., Company Tax Reform in the European Union, New York 2006, 47 for an overview of the apportionment mechanism.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See Agúndez-Garcia, A., The Delineation and Apportionment of an EU Consolidated Tax Base for Multi-Jurisdictional Corporate Income Taxation: A Review of Issues and Options, Taxation Papers, working paper, 2006, 20 for the territorial scope of the consolidated tax base.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See Homburg, S., Competition and Co-ordination in International Capital Income Taxation, FinanzArchiv 1999, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See European Economic Advisory Group at CESifo, Report on the European Economy 2007, Munich, 2007, 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Sørensen, P. B., Company Tax Reform in the European Union, International Tax and Public Finance 2004, 91–115.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Wissenschaftlicher Beirat beim Bundesministerium der Finanzen (Advisory Board to the Federal Ministry of Finance), Einheitliche Bemessungsgrundlage der Körperschaftsteuer in der Europäischen Union, Berlin 2007, 75–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Martens-Weiner, J., Company Tax Reform in the European Union, New York 2006, 105–107.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Commission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee, Implementing the Community Programme for improved growth and employment and the enhanced competitiveness of EU business: Further progress during 2006 and next steps towards a proposal on the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB), Brussels, COM (2007) 223 final, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. European Court of Justice (13 December 2005), Case C-446/03 (Marks & Spencer), ECR I 2005, 10837. Great Britain has reacted by allowing the deduction of foreign losses from the British tax base that definitely cannot be relieved in the member state where the loss originated.

    Google Scholar 

  14. European Court of Justice (12 September 2006), Case C-196/04 (Cadbury Schweppes), OJ C 281, 5. Great Britain has focused CFC rules on controlled companies that do not carry on a genuine economic activity in terms of both business establishment and individuals working for the CFC.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schreiber, U. (2008). Evaluating the Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base. In: Schön, W., Schreiber, U., Spengel, C. (eds) A Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for Europe — Eine einheitliche Körperschaftsteuerbemessungsgrundlage für Europa. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79484-4_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics