Abstract
This study provides a summary of recently proposed alternatives period measures of “longevity” and assesses whether empirical differences between these measures are consistent with predictions from analytic studies. Particular attention is given to the tempo effect. Three of the five period measures are virtually equal to one another in a simulated population in which mortality follows a Gompertz model with a constant rate of improvement. Similar results are observed among females in Denmark, England and Wales and Sweden in the last quarter century. However, these three measures differ substantially from the conventional period life expectancy when mortality changes over time. These findings are consistent with theoretical analysis by Bongaarts and Feeney (2002, in this volume p. 11 and p. 29) which demonstrated that this deviation is caused by a tempo effect whose size varies with the rate of change in mortality.
©2005
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, reprinted with permission
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bongaarts, J. and Feeney, G. Estimating mean lifetime. In this volume, also published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(23):13127–13133. 2003.
Bongaarts, J. and Feeney, G. The quantum and tempo of life cycle events. In this volume, also published in Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, pages 115–151. 2006.
Bongaarts, J. and Feeney, G. (2002). How long do we live? Population and Development Review, 28(1):13–29.
Brouard, N. (1986). Structure, et dynamique des populations. la pyramide des annes a vivre, aspects nationaux et exemples rgionaux. Espaces, Populations, Socits, 2(14–15):157–168.
Goldstein, J. Found in translation? a cohort perspective on tempo-adjusted life expectancy. In this volume, also published in Demographic Research, 14(5):71–84. 2006.
Guillot, M. (2003). The cross-sectional average length of life (CAL): A cross-sectional mortality measure that reflects the experience of cohorts. Population Studies, 57(1):41–54.
Nations, U. (2003). World Population Prospects, The 2002 Revision. New York: United Nations.
Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., and Guillot, M. (2001). Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Rodriguez, G. Demographic Translation and Tempo Effects: An Accelerated Failure Time Perspective. In this volume, also published in Demographic Research, 14(6):85–110. 2006.
Ryder, N. B. (1980). Components of temporal variations in American fertility. In Hiorns, R., editor, Demographic Patterns in Developed Societies, pages 15–54. London: Taylor & Francis.
Schoen, R. and Canudas-Romo, V. (2005). Changing mortality and average cohort life expectancy. Demographic Research, 13(5):117–142.
Schoen, R., Jonsson, S. H., and Tufis, P. (2004). A population with continually declining mortality. paper presented at the PAA 2004, Boston.
Vaupel, J. W. Lifesavings, lifetimes and lifetables. In this volume, also published in Demographic Research, 13(24):597–614. 2005.
Vaupel, J. W. (1986). How change in age-specific mortality rates affect life expectancy. Population Studies, 40:147–157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bongaarts, J. (2008). Five period measures of longevity. In: Barbi, E., Vaupel, J.W., Bongaarts, J. (eds) How Long Do We Live?. Demographic Research Monographs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78520-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78520-0_12
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-78519-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-78520-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)