Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Abstract

Models of topography, such as smooth and non-smooth, single-sided and double-sided, appear to be of value in choosing algorithms to calculate topographic attributes, and assist in predicting and understanding paradoxes in topography, such as statistically predictable or terrain-specific behaviour of landforms. This results in a new vision of how to use geomorphometry in digital terrain analysis: for example, the dependence of topographic attributes on scale creates results in problems of comparing observations obtained from different scales, while the use of predictable landforms may lead to unrealistic expectations of predictable properties of soil or vegetation patterns. The purpose of this chapter is to study models of topography. To achieve this purpose, direct studies on the dependence of topographic attributes on scale are considered, based on a theoretical background, such as two concepts of scale, Gibbs-like phenomena, an internal smoothing in algorithms, and sub-dividing of topographic attributes into non-intersecting classes. Results include a new approach to the comparison of algorithms, some artefacts from Gibbs-like phenomena, and a method to evaluate a minimal grid mesh from contour DEMs. Based on these results and concepts, methodological issues are discussed of both geomorphometry itself, and of its applications in digital terrain analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akima, H. (1978), A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 4: 148–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cayley, A. (1859), On contour and slope lines, Philosophical Magazine, Series 4, (18)120: 264–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, K.C., (1988), Scale-based simulation of topographic relief, The American Cartographer, 15: 173–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dikau, R., (1988), Case studies in the development of derived geomorphic maps, Geologisches Jahrbuch, A104: 329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dokuchaev, V.V., (1886), Razbor glavneishikh pochvennykh ponyatiy, In Dokuchaev, Izbrannye Sochineniya, Vol.3, 1949: 161–239 (Moscow: Sel’hozgiz, in Russian, original work published 1886).

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S., (1972), General geomorphometry, derivatives of altitude, and descriptive statistics, In Chorley, R.J. (ed.): Spatial Analysis in Geomorphology, London: Methuen & Co., Ltd.: 17–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S., (1975), The effect of resolution on gradients calculated from an altitude matrix, Report 3 on Grant DA-ERO-591-73-G0040, ‘Statistical characterization of altitude matrices by computer’, Department of Geography, University of Durham, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S., (1980), An integrated system of terrain analysis and slope mapping, Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F., Suppl.–Band 36: 274–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. and McClean, C.J., (1995), The land surface is not unifractal: variograms, cirque scale and allometry, Zeitschrift für Geomorphologie N.F., Suppl.-Bd., 101: 127–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, I.S. and Cox, N.J., (1999), Relations between land surface properties: altitude, slope and curvature, In Hergarten, S. and Neugebauer H.J. (eds.): Process Modelling and Landform Evolution, Berlin: Springer: 13–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Favalli, M. and Pareshi, T.T., (2004), Digital elevation model construction from structured topographic data: The DEST algorithm, Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, F04004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, R., (1986), Equilibrium Capillary Surfaces, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florinsky, I.V., (1998), Accuracy of local topographic variables derived from digital elevation models, International Journal of Geographical Informational Science, 12: 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, T.G., (1991), Calculating catchment area with divergent flow based on a regular grid, Computers and Geosciences, 17: 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauss, K.F., (1827), Disquisitiones generales circa area superficies curves, Göttingen gelehrte Anziegen, No.177: 1761–1768 (In Latin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, M., (1982), The fractional Brownian process as a terrain simulation model, Modelling and Simulation, 13: 1133–1137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gousie, M.B. and Franklin, W.R., (2005), Augmenting grid-based contours to improve thin-plate DEM generation, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, (71)1: 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D., Bourennane, H., Isampert, M. and Macaire, J.J., (1999), Relationship of the presence of a non-calcareous clay-loam horizon to DEM attributes in a gently sloping area, Geoderma, 89: 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KlemeÅ¡, V., (1983), Conceptualization and scale in hydrology, Journal of Hydrology, 65: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenderink, J.J. and van Doorn, A.J., (1994), Two–plus–one–dimensional differential geometry, Pattern Recognition Letters, 15: 439–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Zhu, Q., and Gold, C., (2005), Digital Terrain Modeling: Principles and Methodology, Florida, Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, R.A. and Shary, P.A., (2007). Extraction and classification of landforms and landform elements, In Hengl, T. and Reuter, H.I. (eds.): Geomorphometry: Concepts, Software, Applications, Ch. 9, Joint Research Centre: European Commission: (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot, B., (1967), How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension, Science, 156(3775): 636–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mark, D.M. and Smith, B., (2004), A science of topography – from qualitative ontology to digital representations, In Bishop, M.P., and Shroder Jr., J.F. (eds.): Geographic Information Science and Mountain Geomorphology, Chichester UK, Praxis Scientific Publishing: Springer-Verlag: 75–110. Available online at: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith//articles/topography.pdf (accessed 29 October 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martz, L.W. and de Jong, E., (1988), CATCH: a Fortran program for measuring catchment area from digital elevation models, Computers and Geosciences, 14: 627–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J.C., (1870), On hills and dales, Philosophical Magazine, Series 4, (40)269: 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikol’sky, S.M., (1975), Kours Matematicheskogo Analiza, 2: 199–203, Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky, Ya.A., Timlin, D.J. and Rawls, W.J., (2001), Soil water retention as related to topographic variables, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65: 1787–1795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennock, D.J., Zebarth, B.J. and de Jong, E., (1987), Landform classification and soil distribution in hummocky terrain, Saskatchewan, Canada, Geoderma, 40: 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peuquet, D.J., (1984), A conceptual framework and comparison of spatial data models, Cartographica, 21: 66–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J.D., (1988), The role of spatial scale in geomorphic systems, Geographical Analysis, 20: 308–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, R., (1995), Geomorphometry – progress, practice, and prospect, Zeitschrift für Geomorphometry N.F. Suppl.– Band, 101: 221–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, L., (1961), The problem of contiguity: An appendix to statistics of deadly quarrels, In Yearbook of the Society for General Systems Research, Vol.6, Michigan: Ann Arbor, 140–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sard, A., (1942), The measure of the critical values of differentiable maps, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 48: 883–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J., Evans, I.S. and Brinkmann, J., (2003), Comparison of polynomial models for land surface curvature calculation, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17: 797–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. and Hewitt, A., (2004), Fuzzy land elements classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position, Geoderma, 121: 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A., (1995), Land surface in gravity points classification by a complete system of curvatures, Mathematical Geology, 27: 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A., Sharaya, L.S. and Mitusov, A.V., (2002), Fundamental quantitative methods of land surface analysis, Geoderma, 107: 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A., (2005), Geomorphometry and ‘Analytical GIS Eco’ software description and demonstration version, Available on-line at: http://www.giseco.info/(accessed 29 October 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A., Sharaya, L.S. and Mitusov, A.V., (2005), The problem of scale-specific and scale-free approaches in geomorphometry, Geografia Fisica e Dinamica Quatrenaria, 28: 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A., (2006a), Variables of geomorphometry: The current state-of-art, In International Symposium on Terrain Analysis and Digital Terrain Mapping (TADTM 2006), November 23–25 in Nanjing, China, Proceedings of TADTM 2006, full paper: CD–ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A., (2006b), Unsolved tasks of geomorphometry. In International Symposium on Terrain Analysis and Digital Terrain Mapping(TADTM 2006), November 23–25 in Nanjing, China, Proceedings of TADTM 2006, full paper: CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shary, P.A. and Sharaya, L.S., (2006), Predictable and terrain–specific landform classifications. In International Symposium on Terrain Analysis and Digital Terrain Mapping (TADTM 2006), November 23–25 in Nanjing, China, Proceedings of TADTM 2006, full paper: CD–ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. and Mark, D.M., (2003), Do mountains exist? Towards an ontology of landforms, Environment & Planning B (Planning and Design), 30: 411–427. Available on-line at: http://ontology.buffalo.edu/smith/articles/Mountains.pdf (accessed 29 October 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa, M.C., Foster, K., Wyvill, B. and Samavati, F., (2003), Precise ink drawing of 3d models, EuroGraphics, 22: 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speight, J.G., (1974). A parametric approach to landform regions. In Progress in Geomorphology. Institute of British Geographers special publ. No.7, Oxford: Alden & Mowbray Ltd. at the Alden Press: 213–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton, D.G., (1997), A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid Digital Elevation Models, Water Resources Research, 33: 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomer, M.D. and Anderson, J.L., (1995), Variation of soil water storage across a sand plain hillslope, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59: 1091–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troeh, F.R., (1964), Landform parameters correlated to soil drainage, Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 28: 808-812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voronoi, G., (1907), Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Journal für die Reine und Angewandte Mathematik, 133: 97–178 (in French).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, J., (1996), The geomorphological characterization of Digital Elevation Models, PhD thesis, University of Leicester, Available on-line at: http://www.soi.city.ac.uk/∼ jwo/phd/(accessed 27 October 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. and Gallant, J. (eds.), (2000), Terrain Analysis: Principles and Applications, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, T.B., Moore, I.D. and Gallant, J.C., (1993), Fractals, fractal dimensions and landscapes – a review, Geomorphology, 8: 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, M., (1978), Terrain analysis: program documentation. Report 5 on Grant DA-ERO-591-73-G0040, ‘Statistical characterization of altitude matrices by computer’, Department of Geography, University of Durham, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, L.W. and Thorne, C.R., (1987), Quantitative analysis of land surface topography, Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 12: 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shary, P.A. (2008). Models of Topography. In: Zhou, Q., Lees, B., Tang, Ga. (eds) Advances in Digital Terrain Analysis. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-77800-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics