Skip to main content

Reconceptualization of External Security in the European Union since 1990

  • Chapter
Globalization and Environmental Challenges

Part of the book series: Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace ((HSHES,volume 3))

Abstract

Since the early 1950’s, European integration and security have become two sides of the same coin. From its very beginning, the West European integration process has been a structurally designed peace project. After two world wars, and following the logic of (neo)functional integration concepts (Mitrany 1943; Haas 1958,1964), the aim was to eliminate the chance of further wars between West European states. Thus, the process of supranational integration was intended to transform the anarchic structure of the West European state system into a “working peace system” (Mitrany 1943). As a consequence, a security community has emerged in Western Europe that has durably excluded force as a means of conflict resolution (Adler/Barnett 1998; Deutsch/Burrel/Kann/Lee/Lichterman/ Lindgren/Loewenheim/Van Wagenen 1957). In this sense, the process of West European integration has been a process of “desecuritization” characterized by a “progressive marginalization of mutual security concerns in favour of other issues” (WÆver 1998a: 69).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. As Baldwin points out, concepts “should not preclude empirical investigation by making true ‘by definition’ what should be open to empirical inquiry” (Baldwin 1997: 7). Similarly, Sjursen states that the “purpose is not to provide a substantive concept of security policy, but rather a conceptual frame that enables us to theoretically account for changes to security policy without at the outset determining its normative content” (Sjursen 2004a: 3). Elsewhere Sjursen (2004b: 60) criticizes that many studies would not distinguish between empirical and normative aspects of security.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See: Baldwin (1997: 12–18): Security for whom? Security for which values? How much security? From what threats? By what means? At what cost? In what time period?

    Google Scholar 

  3. See: MØller (2003: 278–279): Security for whom? Security of what? Security from whom (or what)? Security from what? Security by whom? Security by which means?

    Google Scholar 

  4. Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), 1992, Preamble; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Amsterdam), 1997, Preamble; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Nice), 2001, Preamble.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), 1992, Title V, Art. J.I, 2; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Amsterdam), 1997, Title V, Art. 11, 1; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Nice), 2001, Title V, Art. 11, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), 1992, Title V, Art. J.I, 2; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Amsterdam), 1997, Title V, Art. 11, 1; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Nice), 2001, Title V, Art. 11, 1; see also Single European Act, 1986, Preamble.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See: Giuliano Amato: Speech at the Humboldt University in Berlin, 7 May 2001. In 1995 the Foreign Ministers of the Western European Union characterized the EU as the “cornerstone of peace in Europe”; see WEU 1995: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  8. With the Maastricht treaty not only the EU citizenship was introduced, but also the protection of EU citizens in third countries by embassies of other member states. The so-called ‘Petersberg tasks’, which were drafted by the WEU in 1992 and integrated into the EU treaties in 1997 (Amsterdam), include military rescue operations for the protection of EU citizens. Likewise, the 1995 security strategy of the WEU gave high priority to the “security of European citizens in the world” (WEU 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  9. “The European Union will seek ways to improve the security of its citizens who are resident, or travelling, in third countries and exposed to a terrorist threat” (European Council 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Javier Solana: “Europe: Security in the Twenty-First Century”. The Olof Palme Memorial Lecture, Stockholm 20 June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See, however, the “Canada-European Union Joint Statement on Statement on Human Security: Peace Building and Conflict Prevention”, Lisbon, 26 June 2000; see also: Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See: Council of the EU/ European Commission 2000: “Poverty, and the exclusion which it creates, are the root causes of conflict and are endangering the stability and security of too many countries and regions.”

    Google Scholar 

  13. See: Solana, op. cit., 20 June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mathias Albert: “Die Erde auf dem Weg zur Weltstaatlichkeit”, in: Das Parlament (26 July 2004): 18.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Single European Act, 1986, Preamble; Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), 1992, Title V, Art. J.1, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Single European Act, 1986, Preamble; Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), 1992, Title V, Art. J.1, 2; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Amsterdam), 1997, Title V, Art. 11, 1; Consolidated Version of the Treaty on European Union (Nice), 2001, Title V, Art. 11, 1 (emphasis added by the author).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Javier Solana: “Europe: Security in the Twenty-First Century”, The Olof Palme Memorial Lecture, Stockholm, 20 June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. For example terrorism had been discussed since the 1970’s, firstly on expert level, later within the intergovernmental “Trevi framework” (Smith 2004: 142).

    Google Scholar 

  19. ”Climate change represents perhaps the most challenging environmental problem of all” (European Commission 2001a: 18; see also European Commission 2001e).

    Google Scholar 

  20. In a Communication to the Council and the European Parliament, the European Council indicates “HIV/ AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis” as “major poverty diseases” and dangers to “human security and human rights” (European Commission 2004a).

    Google Scholar 

  21. “Canada-European Union Joint Statement on Human Security: Peace Building and Conflict Prevention”, Lisbon, 26 June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  22. See “Regulation (EC) concerning action against anti-personnel landmines in third countries other than developing countries”, Regulation (EC) N‡1725/2001, 23 July 2001, in: Official Journal of the European Communities, Brussels, 1 September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  23. This accounts especially for the CFSP. Enhancing its efficiency and coherence were constant objectives of the Intergovernmental Conferences in Amsterdam (Wessels 1997) and Nice (Wessels 2001), and of the European Convention (Risse 2003a; Wessels 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Single European Act, February 1986, Preamble.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), 1992, Title V, Art. J.I.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Javier Solana: “An intelligent war on terror”, in: The Jordan Times, 10 November 2004; Javier Solana: “Three ways for Europe to prevail against the terrorists”, in: Financial Times, 25 March 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Javier Solana: “Where does the EU stand on Common Foreign and Security Policy?” Speech at the Forschungsinstitut der Deutschen Gesellschaft für AuswÄrtige Politik [Research Institute of the German Society for Foreign Policy], Berlin, 14 November 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Javier Solana: “Europe must assume its responsibility for security as part of its international relations strategy”, in: Irish Times, 23 September 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Treaty on European Union (Maastricht), 1992, Title V, Art. J.I.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ibid., Title V, Art. J.2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  32. “Humanitarian and rescue tasks; peacekeeping tasks; tasks of combat forces in crisis management, including peacemaking” (WEU 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  33. See “Joint declaration on European defence”, British-French summit, St Malo, 3–4 December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Javier Solana: “Europe: Security in the Twenty-First Century”, Stockholm 20 June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Madeleine Albright: “Die NATO muss grö\er und flexibler werden”, in: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 7 December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Javier Solana: “Europe: Security in the Twenty-First Century ”, Stockholm 20 June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Solana, op.cit., 20 June 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Javier Solana: “Die Rolle Europas in der Welt”, in: Süddeutsche Zeitung, 20 September 2003; translation by the author.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Javier Solana: “An intelligent war on terror”, in: The Jordan Times, 10 November 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  40. See also the “Joint Declaration by the Heads of State and Government of the European Union, The President of the European Parliament, The President of the European Commission, and the High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy”, Brussels, 14 September 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See: Javier Solana: “An intelligent war on terror”, in: The Jordan Times, 10 November 2004. In another article Solana stated that: “No cause justifies terrorism, but nothing justifies ignoring the causes of terrorism.” Javier Solana: “Three ways for Europe to prevail against the terrorists”, in: Financial Times, 25 March 2004: see European Council 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hintermeier, S. (2008). Reconceptualization of External Security in the European Union since 1990. In: Brauch, H.G., et al. Globalization and Environmental Challenges. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75977-5_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics