Summary
This chapter investigates the ‘winner-takes-all’ hypothesis in relation to how academic researchers access online sources and resources. Some have argued that the Web provides access to a wider range of sources of information than offline resources. Others, such as Hindman et al. (2003), have shown that access to online resources is highly concentrated, particularly because of how Internet search engines are designed. With researchers increasingly using the Web and Internet search engines to disseminate and locate information and expertise, the question of whether the use of online resources enhances or diminishes the range of available sources of expertise is bound to become more pressing. To address this question four globally relevant knowledge domains were investigated using large-scale link analysis and a series of semi-structured interviews with UK-based academic researchers. We found there to be no uniform ‘winner-takes-all’ effect in the use of online resources. Instead, there were different types of information gatekeepers for the four domains we examined and for the types of resources and sources that are sought. Particular characteristics of a knowledge domain’s information environment appear to determine whether Google and other Internet search engines function as a facilitator in accessing expertise or as an influential gatekeeper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams A, Blandford A (2005) Digital libraries’ support for the user’s information journey. Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries 2005, Denver, CO, USA, June 7–11, pp 160–169
Adams A, Blandford A, Lunt P (2005) Social empowerment and exclusion: a case study on digital libraries. ACM Transactions on Computer–Human Interaction, 12.
Barabasi A (2003) Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus Books, New York
Bates MJ (1996) Learning about the information seeking of interdisciplinary scholars and students. Library Trends 45: 155–164
Beauvisage T (2004) A semantics of users’ paths through the web. Unpublished PhD, University of Paris X: Nanterre, Paris (translated by Van Couvering, Web Behaviour: Search engines in context, draft paper)
Becher T, Trowler P (2001) Academic tribes and territories: intellectual inquiry and the culture of disciplines (2nd ed.). Open University Press, Milton Keynes
Caldas A (2005) On the origins of the web species and complexity. Paper presented to the New Approaches to Research on the Social Implications of Emerging Technologies Workshop, Oxford, 15–16 April
Van Couvering E (2006) Web behaviour: search engines in context. Available at: http://personal.lse.ac.uk/VANCOUVE/. Accessed 3 August 2006
Dahl R (1989) Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Dutton WH, Gillet SE, McKnight LW, Peltu M (2003) Broadband Internet: the power to reconfigure access. Forum discussion paper no. 1, Oxford Internet Institute, August 2003
Fallows D (2005) Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting–but they are also unaware and naïve. Report of the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Available at: http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Searchengine_users.pdf. Accessed 3 August 2006
Fry J (2006) Studying the scholarly web: how disciplinary culture shapes online representations. Cybermetrics, 10. Available at: http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/vol10iss1.html. Accessed 3 August 2006
Fry J, Talja S (2004) The cultural shaping of scholarly communication: explaining e-journal use within and across academic fields. In: ASIST 2004: Proceedings of the 67th ASIST Annual Meeting 41. Medford, NJ.: Information Today
Fry J, Talja S (2007) The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science 33: 115–137
Granka LA, Joachims T, Gay G (2004) Eye-tracking analysis of user behavior in www-search. Proceedings of the 27th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp 478–479
Hindman M, Tsioutsiouliklis K, Johnson J (2003) Googlearchy: how a few heavily-linked sites dominate politics on the web. Available at: http://www.princeton.edu/dmhindman/googlearchy–hindman.pdf. Accessed 7 February 2006
Hjørland B, Albrechtsen H (1995) Toward a new horizon in information science : domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46: 400–425
Jansen BJ, Spink A (2006) How are we searching the world wide web? a comparison of nine search engine transaction logs. Information Processing and Management 42: 248–263
Johnson DE, Case DO, Andres J, Allard SL, Johnson NE (2006) Fields and pathways: contrasting or complementary views of information seeking. Information Processing and Management 42: 569–582
Kuhlthau CC (1993) Seeking meaning: a process approach to library and information services. Ablex, Norwood, NJ
Merton RK (1988) The Matthew effect in science II, Isis 79: 606–623
Mote LJB (1962) Reasons for the variation of information needs of scientists. Journal of Documentation 18: 169–175
Palmer CL, Neumann LJ (2002) The information work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: exploration and translation, Library Quarterly 72: 85–117.
Park HW, Thelwall M (2005) The network approach to web hyperlink research and its utility for science communication. In Christine Hine (Ed.) Virtual methods: issues in social research on the Internet. Berg, Oxford: 171–181
Pennock DM, Flake GW, Lawrence S, Glover EJ, Giles CL (2002) Winners don’t take all: characterizing the competition for links on the web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 5207–5211
Pew Internet and American Life Survey (2005) Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied and trusting–but they are also unaware and naïve. Available at: http://www.pewInternet.org/PPF/r/146/report_display.asp. Accessed 12 July 2006
Pharo N, Jarvelin K (2006) Irrational searchers and IR-rational researchers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57: 222–232
Schneider SM, Foot KA (2002) Online structure for political action: exploring presidential websites from the 2000 American election, Javnost (The Public) 9: 43–60
Schroeder R, Caldas A, Mesch G, Dutton W (2005) The world wide web of science: reconfiguring access to information, First International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester 22–24 June, Available at: http://www.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/project.cfm?id=22. Accessed 6 March 2007
Solomon P (1999) Information mosaics: patterns of action that structure. In Wilson, T., and Allen, D.K. (Ed.) Exploring the contexts of information behaviour (pp. 150–175). UK. London: Taylor Graham
Spink A, Wolfram D, Jansen BJ, Saracevic T (2001) Searching the web: the public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52: 226–234
Thelwall M (2006) Interpreting social science link analysis research: a theoretical framework. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57: 60–68
Thelwall M, Vaughan L, Björneborn L (2005) Webometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 39: 81–135
Törmä S, Vakkari P (2004) Discipline, availability of electronic resources and the use of Finnish national electronic library–FinELib. Information Research 10 Available at http://informationr.net/ir/10–1/paper204.html. Accessed 13 July 2006
Tuominen K, Talja S, Savolainen R (2003) Multiperspective digital libraries: the implications of constructionism for the development of digital libraries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54: 561–569
Vakkari P, Talja S (2005) The influence of the scatter of literature on the use of electronic resources across disciplines: a case study of FinElib. In: A. Rauber et al. (Eds.) ECDL 2005, LNCS 3652, pp 207–217
Walsh JP, Bayma T (1996) Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science 26: 661–703
Wang P, Berry MW, Yang Y (2003) Mining longitudinal web queries: trends and patterns. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54: 743–758
Whitley R (2000). (2nd ed.) The intellectual and social organization of the sciences, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fry, J., Virkar, S., Schroeder, R. (2008). Search Engines and Expertise about Global Issues: Well-defined Landscape or Undomesticated Wilderness?. In: Spink, A., Zimmer, M. (eds) Web Search. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75828-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75829-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)