Skip to main content

A Long-Term Evaluation of Sensing Modalities for Activity Recognition

  • Conference paper
UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4717))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We study activity recognition using 104 hours of annotated data collected from a person living in an instrumented home. The home contained over 900 sensor inputs, including wired reed switches, current and water flow inputs, object and person motion detectors, and RFID tags. Our aim was to compare different sensor modalities on data that approached “real world” conditions, where the subject and annotator were unaffiliated with the authors. We found that 10 infra-red motion detectors outperformed the other sensors on many of the activities studied, especially those that were typically performed in the same location. However, several activities, in particular “eating” and “reading” were difficult to detect, and we lacked data to study many fine-grained activities. We characterize a number of issues important for designing activity detection systems that may not have been as evident in prior work when data was collected under more controlled conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Munguia Tapia, E., Intille, S.S., Lopez, L., Larson, K.: The design of a portable kit of wireless sensors for naturalistic data collection. In: Fishkin, K.P., Schiele, B., Nixon, P., Quigley, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3968, pp. 117–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Munguia Tapia, E., Intille, S., Larson, K.: Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 158–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Philipose, M., Smith, J.R., Jiang, B., Mamishev, A., Roy, S., Sundara-Rajan, K.: Battery-free wireless identification and sensing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 4(1), 37–45 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lester, J., Choudhury, T., Kern, N., Borriello, G., Hannaford, B.: A hybrid discriminative/generative approach for modeling human activities. In: IJCAI, pp. 766–772 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bao, L., Intille, S.S.: Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, D.H., Atkeson, C.G.: Simultaneous tracking and activity recognition (STAR) using many anonymous, binary sensors. In: Gellersen, H.-W., Want, R., Schmidt, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3468, pp. 62–79. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, S., Pentney, W., Popescu, A.-M., Choudhury, T., Philipose, M.: Common sense joint training of human activity recognizers. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fishkin, K.P., Philipose, M., Rea, A.D.: Hands-On RFID: Wireless wearables for detecting use of objects. In: ISWC, pp. 38–43 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Intille, S.S., Larson, K., Munguia Tapia, E., Beaudin, J.S., Kaushik, P., Nawyn, J., Rockinson, R.: Using a live-in laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In: Fishkin, K.P., Schiele, B., Nixon, P., Quigley, A. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2006. LNCS, vol. 3968, pp. 349–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fogarty, J., Au, C., Hudson, S.E.: Sensing from the basement: a feasibility study of unobtrusive and low-cost home activity recognition. In: UIST, pp. 91–100 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patterson, D., Fox, D., Kautz, H., Philipose, M.: Fine-Grained Activity Recognition by Aggregating Abstract Object Usage. In: ISWC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Placelab Data website. Available: architecture.mit.edu/house_n/data/PlaceLab/PlaceLab.htm

  13. Quiet care systems. Available: www.quietcaresystems.com

  14. E-Neighbor system from Healthsense. Available: www.healthsense.com

  15. i-pot from Zojirushi Corporation. Available: www.mimamori.net

  16. Witten, I., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Streiner, D.L., Cairney, J.: What’s under the ROC? An introduction to receiver operating characteristic curves. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 52(2) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

John Krumm Gregory D. Abowd Aruna Seneviratne Thomas Strang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Logan, B., Healey, J., Philipose, M., Tapia, E.M., Intille, S. (2007). A Long-Term Evaluation of Sensing Modalities for Activity Recognition. In: Krumm, J., Abowd, G.D., Seneviratne, A., Strang, T. (eds) UbiComp 2007: Ubiquitous Computing. UbiComp 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4717. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74853-3_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74852-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74853-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics