Abstract
Scientific evidence is now available to show that the spatial and temporal heterogeneity created by agroforestry plantings can help enhance resources, increase production, reduce risks of monocultural agricultural and forestry practices, and achieve system stability and sustainability. Previous sections in this chapter have shown this. In summary, the biological advantages of agroforestry in risk assessments are increased site utilization; improved soil characteristics; increased productivity; reduced soil erosion; reduced microclimate extremes; positive use of microclimate changes; enhanced above- and below-ground biodiversity (Ruark et al. 2003).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alegre J, Krishnamurthy L, Callo-Concha D (2004) Carbon sequestration by Amazonian agroforestry systems. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry – Book of Abstracts, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Orlando, p 162
Chan AK (2001) Application of basic knowledge on relationship between meteorological factors and sustainable agricultural production and protection of commercial tree crops. Report of the CAgM Working Group on Weather and Climate Related to Agricultural Production. CAgM Report 87, WMO/TD 1079, Geneva, pp 61–80
Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) (2005) African regional implementation review for the 14th session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD-14). Prepared by UNEP, Nairobi. http://www.uneca.org/csd/CSD4_Report_on_Climate_Change.htm
Ghosh K, Chattopadhyay N, Das HP, Samui RP, Balsubramanian R, Rajavel M (2005) Effect of rainfall variability on coconut and tea over Kerala. In: Nybe EV, Prasada Rao GSLHV (eds) Drought management in plantation crops. Proceedings of the National Workshop, KAU, Thrissur, pp 84–87
Gurusamy A, Natarajan C, Vaithilingam R, Arulraj S (2008) Analysis on seasonal rainfall behaviour and its influence on the productivity of coconut. J Agrometeorol 10:408–410
Harmand JM, Njiti C, Bernhard-Reversat F, Olivier R, Feller C (2004) Changes in below ground carbon stocks during rotation “Tree improved fallow – Crops” in the dry tropics of Cameroon. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry – Book of Abstracts, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Orlando, p 182
Kadaster International (2008) Cadastres and climate change. Abroad (Periodical Newsletter of Kadaster International). Special edition of December. http://www.kadaster.nl/pdf/abroad_200812.pdf
Lehman J, Gaunt J (2004) Carbon sequestration in soils under agroforestry. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry – Book of Abstracts, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Orlando, p 190
Maracchi G, Sirotenko O, Bindi M (2005) Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Clim Change 70:117–135
National Research Council (1989) Field testing genetically modified organisms: framework for decisions. Committee on Scientific Evaluation of the Introduction of Genetically Modified Microorganisms and Plants into the Environment. National Academic Press, New York, 184pp. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1431&toc
Owusu-Manu E (1996) Agroclimatic factors and cocoa production. CAgM Report 67, WMO/TD 747, Geneva, 33pp
Rajagopal V, Naresh Kumar S (2005) Drought management strategies in coconut under different agroclimatic zones. In: Nybe EV, Prasada Rao GSLHV (eds) Drought management in plantation crops. Proceedings of the National Workshop, KAU, Thrissur, pp 35–40
Reed M (2000) A comparative review of agroforestry practices in two forest-adjacent parishes on Mount Elgon, Uganda. Mount Elgon Conservation and Development Project. http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/misc/elgon/agroforestry.html
Ruark GA, Schoeneberger MM, Nair PKR (2003) Roles for agroforestry in helping to achieve sustainable forest management. UNFF Intersessional Experts Meeting on the Role of Planted Forests in Sustainable Forest Management, New Zealand. http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/unff-planted-forestry-meeting/conference-papers/roles-foragroforestry.htm
Stathers RJ, Rollerson TP, Mitchell SJ (1994) Windthrow handbook for British Columbia forests. Working Paper 940, Ministry of Forests, Victoria, 33pp
UNEP (2006) Africa environment outlook 2. UNEP, Nairobi. http://www.unep.org/dewa/Africa/publications/AEO-2/content/001.htm
Wilson SJ, Hebda RJ (2008) Mitigating and adapting to climate change through the conservation of nature. Land Trust Aliance of British Columbia, Salt Spring Island, 58pp. http://www.landtrustalliance.bc.ca/docs/LTAClimateChangeWebSingleP.pdf
Zhao Y, Wang C, Wang S, Tibig LV (2005) Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the humid and sub-humid tropics. Clim Change 70:73–116
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stigter, C., Das, H., Ramesh, K. (2010). Improving Weather and Climate Related Risk Assessments for Non-Forest Trees. In: Stigter, K. (eds) Applied Agrometeorology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74698-0_84
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74698-0_84
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74697-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74698-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)