Skip to main content

Improving Weather and Climate Related Risk Assessments for Non-Forest Trees

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Applied Agrometeorology

Abstract

Scientific evidence is now available to show that the spatial and temporal heterogeneity created by agroforestry plantings can help enhance resources, increase production, reduce risks of monocultural agricultural and forestry practices, and achieve system stability and sustainability. Previous sections in this chapter have shown this. In summary, the biological advantages of agroforestry in risk assessments are increased site utilization; improved soil characteristics; increased productivity; reduced soil erosion; reduced microclimate extremes; positive use of microclimate changes; enhanced above- and below-ground biodiversity (Ruark et al. 2003).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alegre J, Krishnamurthy L, Callo-Concha D (2004) Carbon sequestration by Amazonian agroforestry systems. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry – Book of Abstracts, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Orlando, p 162

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan AK (2001) Application of basic knowledge on relationship between meteorological factors and sustainable agricultural production and protection of commercial tree crops. Report of the CAgM Working Group on Weather and Climate Related to Agricultural Production. CAgM Report 87, WMO/TD 1079, Geneva, pp 61–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) (2005) African regional implementation review for the 14th session of the Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD-14). Prepared by UNEP, Nairobi. http://www.uneca.org/csd/CSD4_Report_on_Climate_Change.htm

  • Ghosh K, Chattopadhyay N, Das HP, Samui RP, Balsubramanian R, Rajavel M (2005) Effect of rainfall variability on coconut and tea over Kerala. In: Nybe EV, Prasada Rao GSLHV (eds) Drought management in plantation crops. Proceedings of the National Workshop, KAU, Thrissur, pp 84–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurusamy A, Natarajan C, Vaithilingam R, Arulraj S (2008) Analysis on seasonal rainfall behaviour and its influence on the productivity of coconut. J Agrometeorol 10:408–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmand JM, Njiti C, Bernhard-Reversat F, Olivier R, Feller C (2004) Changes in below ground carbon stocks during rotation “Tree improved fallow – Crops” in the dry tropics of Cameroon. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry – Book of Abstracts, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Orlando, p 182

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadaster International (2008) Cadastres and climate change. Abroad (Periodical Newsletter of Kadaster International). Special edition of December. http://www.kadaster.nl/pdf/abroad_200812.pdf

  • Lehman J, Gaunt J (2004) Carbon sequestration in soils under agroforestry. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress of Agroforestry – Book of Abstracts, University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Orlando, p 190

    Google Scholar 

  • Maracchi G, Sirotenko O, Bindi M (2005) Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the temperate regions: Europe. Clim Change 70:117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1989) Field testing genetically modified organisms: framework for decisions. Committee on Scientific Evaluation of the Introduction of Genetically Modified Microorganisms and Plants into the Environment. National Academic Press, New York, 184pp. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1431&toc

  • Owusu-Manu E (1996) Agroclimatic factors and cocoa production. CAgM Report 67, WMO/TD 747, Geneva, 33pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal V, Naresh Kumar S (2005) Drought management strategies in coconut under different agroclimatic zones. In: Nybe EV, Prasada Rao GSLHV (eds) Drought management in plantation crops. Proceedings of the National Workshop, KAU, Thrissur, pp 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed M (2000) A comparative review of agroforestry practices in two forest-adjacent parishes on Mount Elgon, Uganda. Mount Elgon Conservation and Development Project. http://www.see.leeds.ac.uk/misc/elgon/agroforestry.html

  • Ruark GA, Schoeneberger MM, Nair PKR (2003) Roles for agroforestry in helping to achieve sustainable forest management. UNFF Intersessional Experts Meeting on the Role of Planted Forests in Sustainable Forest Management, New Zealand. http://www.maf.govt.nz/mafnet/unff-planted-forestry-meeting/conference-papers/roles-foragroforestry.htm

  • Stathers RJ, Rollerson TP, Mitchell SJ (1994) Windthrow handbook for British Columbia forests. Working Paper 940, Ministry of Forests, Victoria, 33pp

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2006) Africa environment outlook 2. UNEP, Nairobi. http://www.unep.org/dewa/Africa/publications/AEO-2/content/001.htm

  • Wilson SJ, Hebda RJ (2008) Mitigating and adapting to climate change through the conservation of nature. Land Trust Aliance of British Columbia, Salt Spring Island, 58pp. http://www.landtrustalliance.bc.ca/docs/LTAClimateChangeWebSingleP.pdf

  • Zhao Y, Wang C, Wang S, Tibig LV (2005) Impacts of present and future climate variability on agriculture and forestry in the humid and sub-humid tropics. Clim Change 70:73–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C.J. Stigter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stigter, C., Das, H., Ramesh, K. (2010). Improving Weather and Climate Related Risk Assessments for Non-Forest Trees. In: Stigter, K. (eds) Applied Agrometeorology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74698-0_84

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics