One of the interesting features of string theory is that, it reduces to quantum field theory in the infinite string tension limit. Consequently, in this limit the string scattering amplitudes should reduce to corresponding field theory amplitudes. First realization of this idea was the derivation of the one-loop β-function coefficient for the pure Yang-Mills theory from the partition function of an open string propagating in a Yang-Mills background [10]. Another investigation of the infinite string tension limit was done by Bern and Kosower [11] with the aim of finding useful results to be used for QCD calculations. The idea was to derive a parameter integral expression for gluon — gluon scattering amplitude from the string scattering amplitude in a superstring theory. In the infinite string tension limit all massive modes are suppressed and massless string modes survive, and one obtains a parameter integral representation of string scattering amplitude. This corresponds to the gauge boson scattering amplitude in some parameter (Schwinger parameter) integral representation in the field theory. The rules obtained in this approach for the calculation of field theory amplitudes are named as Bern-Kosower rules. In [1], Bern-Kosower rules have been derived in the field theory framework, as a continuation of this idea, without applying string theory. So there appeared a new formalism named worldline formalism. This formalism was applied to a number of field theory [2], and gravity problems [12]. A good pedagogical introduction to worldline formalism was given in [3]. In this lecture we intend to give an introduction to worldline formalism based on papers [1,2].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. J. Strassler, Nucl. Phys. B 385, 145 (1992) [arXiv:hep-ph/9205205].
C. Schubert, Phys. Rept. 355, 73 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0101036].
C. Schubert, “An Introduction to the Worldline Technique for Quantum Field Theory Calculations” [arXiv: hep-th/9610108]
Y. Ohnuki, T. Kashiwa, Prog. Theor. Phys. vol. 60, No 2 (1978), 548 Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 60 No. 2 (1978) pp. 548–564 URL: http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/60/548/ DOI : 10.1143/PTP.60.548
A.M. Polyakov, “Gauge fields and Strings”, (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1987)
R. Gopakumar, Phys. Rev. D 70, 025009 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0308184].
G. Chalmers, H. Nastase, K. Schalm and R. Siebelink, Nucl. Phys. B 540, 247 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9805105].
Sh. Mamedov and S. Parvizi, “AdS∕CFT correspondence via R-Current correlation functions revisited” [arXiv:hep-th/0505162]
Sh. Mamedov, “AdS interpretation of two-point correlation function of QED”, Proceedings of 11-th Regional Conference on Mathematical Physics, 3–6 May, (Tehran, Iran) World Scientific, 2005, pp. 183–185, [arXiv:hep-th/0510006]
R.R. Metsayev and A.A. Tseytlin, Nucl. Phys. B 298, 109 (1988)
Z.Bern, D.A. Kosower, Nucl. Phys. B 379, 451 (1992) The computation of loop amplitudes in gauge theories Nuclear Physics B, Volume 379, Issue 3, 27 July 1992, Pages 451–561
F. Bastianelli and A. Zirotti, Nucl. Phys. B 642, 372 (2002) [hep-th/0205182].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mamedov, S. (2008). Worldline Formalism and It’s Application to AdS/CFT Correspondence. In: Aliev, T., Pak, N.K., Serin, M. (eds) The Standard Model and Beyond. Springer Proceedings in Physics, vol 118. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73621-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73621-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-73620-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-73621-9
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)