Skip to main content

The Role of Land Degradation in the Agriculture and Environment Nexus

  • Chapter
Climate and Land Degradation

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

Abstract

The relationship between agriculture and environment could be viewed as conflicting (win-lose) or as synergistic (win-win). A win-lose situation is occurring when agricultural activities such as clearing forest for cultivation is leading to environmental degradation or when environmental protection prevents agricultural activity. A synergistic approach, on the other hand, assumes that sustainable environmental management and agricultural production can be achieved simultaneously. One central goal of the Global Environment Facility (GEF) and UNEP is to mainstream sustainable land management into sectors such as agriculture and forestry, thus assuming that win-win situations are possible. The different conceptual frameworks that UNEP has applied and developed in its GEF-funded land degradation projects highlight different aspects of the relationship between agriculture and environment.

The paper draws on 10 years of UNEP/GEF experience in working at the environment-agriculture nexus starting with the People, Land Management and Environmental Change Project (PLEC). PLEC illustrates the potential for synergies between environmental and developmental objectives by developing sustainable and participatory approaches to biodiversity management and conservation based on farmers’ technologies and knowledge within agricultural systems. The Land Use Change, Impacts and Dynamics Project (LUCID) developed a model on how to use land use change analysis in combination with social and economic variables as a tool to assess biodiversity loss and land degradation across landscapes. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) assessment framework offers a mechanism for decision-makers to: (1) identify options that can better achieve core human development and sustainability goals; and (2) better understand the trade-offs involved in decisions concerning the environment. The Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) uses the Driving Forces-Pressures-State-Impact-Responses (DPSIR) framework in analysing the environment-agriculture nexus in drylands.

This overview shows how the relationship between agriculture and environment can be analysed using different models and approaches depending of scale and level of analysis. The PLEC model is useful at the local level in reconciling environmental and livelihood goals. Land use change analysis is a useful tool at the landscape level in analysing drivers of land degradation and biodiversity loss. The ecosystem services approach by the MA provides a tool for decision-makers at national level to make informed decisions about trade-offs between agriculture/human well-being and the environment. Finally, LADA will use the DPSIR framework for integration of information collected at different scales, from the local to the global.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beinart W (1996) Soil Erosion, Animals and Pasture over the Longer Term. Environmental Destruction in Southern Africa. In: Leach M and Mearns R (eds) The Lie of the Land. Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment. The International African Institute, London, in association with James Currey Ltd, pp. 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggelaar C, Lal R, Wiebe K, and Breneman V (2003) The Global Impact of Soil Erosion on Productivity, Adv Agron 81:1–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H (1995) Postscript: the ‘population-environment nexus’ and PLEC, Global Environ Chang 5:381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H (2001) Exploring Agrodiversity. Colombia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H (2002) Agrodiversity and agrobiodiversity. In: Brookfield H, Padoch C, Parsons H and Stocking M (eds) Cultivating Biodiversity. Understanding, Analysing and Using Agricultural Diversity. ITDG Publishing, London, pp. 9–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H (2003) The evolution of PLEC’s work, 1992–2002. In: Brookfield H, Parsons H, Brookfield M (eds) Agrodiversity. Learning from Farmers across the World. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H and Stocking M (1999) Agrodiversity: definition, description and design, Global Environ Chang 9:77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H, Padoch C, Parsons H, Stocking M (eds) (2002) Cultivating Biodiversity. Understanding, Analysing and Using Agricultural Diversity. ITDG Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield H, Parsons H, Brookfield M (2003) How PLEC worked towards its objectives. In: Brookfield H, Parsons H, Brookfield M (eds) Agrodiversity. Learning from Farmers across the World. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 21–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell DJ, Gichohi H, Reid R, Mwangi A, Chege L, Sawin T (2002) Competition and Conflict between People and Wildlife In Kajiado District, Kenya, LUCID Working Paper Series Number: 18, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney D (ed) (1998a) Sustainable Rural Livelihood. What contribution can we make? Papers presented at the Department for International Development’s Natural Resources Advisors’ Conference, July 1998. London: DFID

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney D (1998b) Introduction. In: Carney D (ed) Sustainable Rural Livelihood. What contribution can we make? Papers presented at the Department for International Development’s Natural Resources Advisors’ Conference, July 1998. London: DFID, pp. 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Dao Z, Guo H, Chen A, Fu Y (2003) China. In: Brookfield H, Parsons H and Brookfield M (eds.) Agrodiversity. Learning from farmers across the world, United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 195–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (2000) Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis-Jones J, Tengberg A (2000) The Impact of Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation Practices on Soil Productivity: Examples from Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda, Land Degrad Dev 11:19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairhead J, Leach M (1996) Misreading the African Landscape. Society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairhead J, Leach M (1998) Reframing Deforestation. Global analysis and local realities: studies in West Africa. Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2006) Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA) project, presentation by FAO LADA team at LADA meeting 29 November 2006, Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Githiga JM, Reid R, Muchiru A, Dijk S (2003) Survey of Water Quality Changes with Land Use Type, in the Loitokitok Area, Kajiado District, Kenya, LUCID Working Paper Series Number: 35, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann SM, Hutchinson CF (2005) The changing contexts of the desertification debate, J Arid Environ 63:538–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoben A (1996) The Cultural Construction of Environmental Policy. Paradigms and Politics in Ethiopia. In: Leach M, Mearns R (eds) The Lie of the Land. Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment. The International African Institute, London, in association with James Currey Ltd, pp. 186–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson CF, Herrmann SM (2005) Introduction: The “Greening” of the Sahel, Editoral, J Arid Environ 63:535–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamau P (2004) Forage Diversity and Impact of Grazing Management on Rangeland Ecosystems in Mbeere District, Kenya, LUCID Working Paper no. 36, available at http://www.lucideastafrica.org/publications.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach M, Mearns R (eds) (1996a) The Lie of the Land. Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment (African Issues), The International African Institute, London, in association with James Currey Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach M, Mearns R (1996b) Challenging Received Wisdom in Africa. In: Leach M, Mearns R (eds) The Lie of the Land. Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment (African Issues), The International African Institute, London, in association with James Currey Ltd, pp. 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonergan S (2005) The role of UNEP in desertification research and mitigation, Preface. J Arid Environ 63: 533–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment, Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment) (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Desertification Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitima J, Reid RS, Gachimbi LN, Majule A, Lyaruu H, Pomeroy D, Mugatha S, Mathai S, Mugisha S (2004a) Regional Syntheses Paper: The Linkages between Land Use Change, Land Degradation and Biodiversity across East Africa. LUCID Working Paper Series Number 42, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitima J, Reid RS, Gachimbi LN, Majule A, Lyaruu H, Pomery D, Mugatha S, Mathai S, Mugisha S (2004b) A methodological guide on how to identify trends and linkages between changes in land use, biodiversity and land degradation, LUCID Working Paper Series Number: 43, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne E, Sessay MF, Easter M, Paustian K, Killian K (2007) Sustainable Land Management Through Soil Organic Carbon Management and Sequestration — The GEFSOC Modelling System. In: Sivakumar MVK, Ndiang’ui N (eds) Climate and Land Degradation, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. xx–xx

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore M (1998) Roots in the African Dust: Sustaining the Sub-Saharan Drylands. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Movik S, Dejene S, Synnevåg G (2003) Poverty and Environmental Degradation in the Drylands: An overview of the Problems and Processes. Noragric Working Paper No. 29, July 2003, Noragric, Agricultural University of Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson L, Eklundh L, Ardo J (2005) A recent greening of the Sahel — trends, patterns and potential causes, J Arid Environ 63:556–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagiola S (1999) The Global Environmental Benefits of Land Degradation Control on Agricultural Land. World Bank Environment Papers Series Number 16. The World Bank, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN (1995) Regenerating Agriculture. Policies and Practice for Sustainability and Self-Reliance. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid RS, Gachimbi LN, Worden J, Wangui EE, Mathai S, Mugatha SM, Campbell DJ, Maitima JM, Butt B, Gichohi H, Ogol E (2004) Linkages between Changes in Land Use, Biodiversity and Land Degradation in the Loitokitok Area of Kenya, LUCID Working Paper Series Number: 49, International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1996) Range Management Science and Policy. Politics, Polemics and Pasture in Southern Africa. In: Leach M, Mearns R (eds) The Lie of the Land. Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment (African Issues), The International African Institute, London, in association with James Currey Ltd, pp. 34–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocking M (2002) Agrodiversity, environmental protection and sustaining rural livelihoods: the global view. In: Brookfield H, Padoch C, Parsons H, Stocking M (eds) Cultivating Biodiversity. Understanding, Analysing and Using Agricultural Diversity. ITDG Publishing, London, pp. 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift J (1996) Desertification. Narratives, Winners & Losers. In: Leach M, Mearns R (eds) The Lie of the Land. Challenging Received Wisdom on the African Environment (African Issues), The International African Institute, London, in association with James Currey Ltd, pp. 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas DSG, Middleton NJ (1994) Desertification. Exploding the Myth. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffen M, Mortimore M, Gichuki F (1994) More People, Less Erosion. Environmental Recovery in Kenya. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2004) UNEP’s Strategy on Land Use Management and Soil Conservation. A strengthened Functional Approach, UNEP Policy Series, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (1997) World Atlas of Desertification. Editorial commentary by N. Middleton and D.S.G. Thomas. Edward Arnold, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tengberg, A., Torheim, SI.B. (2007). The Role of Land Degradation in the Agriculture and Environment Nexus. In: Sivakumar, M.V.K., Ndiang’ui, N. (eds) Climate and Land Degradation. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72438-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics