Skip to main content

Combining Evidence for Relevance Criteria: A Framework and Experiments in Web Retrieval

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4425))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a framework that assesses relevance with respect to several relevance criteria, by combining the query-dependent and query-independent evidence indicating these criteria. This combination of evidence is modelled in a uniform way, irrespective of whether the evidence is associated with a single document or related documents. The framework is formally expressed within Dempster-Shafer theory. It is evaluated for web retrieval in the context of TREC’s Topic Distillation task. Our results indicate that aggregating content-based evidence from the linked pages of a page is beneficial, and that the additional incorporation of their homepage evidence further improves the effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barry, C.L.: User-defined relevance criteria: An exploratory study. JASIS 45(3), 149–159 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1–7), 107–117 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Callan, J.P., Croft, W.B., Harding, S.M.: The INQUERY retrieval system. In: DEXA’92, pp. 78–83 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chiaramella, Y.: Information retrieval and structured documents. In: Agosti, M., Crestani, F., Pasi, G. (eds.) ESSIR 2000. LNCS, vol. 1980, pp. 286–309. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Craswell, N., Hawking, D.: Overview of the trec-2003 web track. In: TREC-2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Craswell, N., Hawking, D.: Overview of the trec-2004 web track. In: TREC-2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Craswell, N., et al.: Relevance weighting for query independent evidence. In: SIGIR’05, Salvador, Brazil, pp. 416–423 (2005), doi:10.1145/1076034.1076106

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dempster, A.: A generalization of bayesian inference. Journal of Royal Statistical Society 30, 205–247 (1968)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Eiron, N., McCurley, K.S.: Untangling compound documents on the web. In: ACM Hypertext and Hypermedia conference, Nottingham, UK, pp. 85–94. ACM Press, New York (2003), doi:10.1145/900051.900070

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuhr, N., et al. (eds.): INEX 2004. LNCS, vol. 3493. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinberg, J.: Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM 46(5), 604–632 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Kraaij, W., Westerveld, T., Hiemstra, D.: The importance of prior probabilities for entry page search. In: SIGIR’02, Tampere, Finland, pp. 27–34 (2002), doi:10.1145/564376.564383

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marchiori, M.: The quest for correct information on the web: hyper search engines. In: Proceedings of the 6th WWW conference, Santa Clara, California, United States, pp. 1225–1235 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Plachouras, V., Ounis, I.: Usefulness of hyperlink structure for query-biased topic distillation. In: SIGIR’04, pp. 448–455 (2004), doi:10.1145/1008992.1009069

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qin, T., et al.: A study of relevance propagation for web search. In: SIGIR’05, pp. 408–415 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roelleke, T., et al.: The accessibility dimension for structured document retrieval. In: Crestani, F., Girolami, M., van Rijsbergen, C.J.K. (eds.) Advances in Information Retrieval. LNCS, vol. 2291, pp. 382–402. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Soboroff, I.: On evaluating web search with very few relevant documents. In: SIGIR ’04, pp. 530–531 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Giambattista Amati Claudio Carpineto Giovanni Romano

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsikrika, T., Lalmas, M. (2007). Combining Evidence for Relevance Criteria: A Framework and Experiments in Web Retrieval. In: Amati, G., Carpineto, C., Romano, G. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4425. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71496-5_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71496-5_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-71494-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-71496-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics