Skip to main content

Strata of Intervenient Concepts in Normative Systems

  • Conference paper
Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5076))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 554 Accesses

Abstract

Writing a contract of a specific content is a ground for purchase, purchase is a ground for ownership, ownership is a ground for power to dispose. Also power to dispose is a consequence of ownership, ownership is a consequence of purchase. etc. The paper presents a continuation of the authors’ previous algebraic representation on ground - consequence chains in normative systems.The paper analyzes different kinds of “implicative closeness” between grounds and consequences in chains of legal concepts, in particular combinations of “weakest ground”, “strongest consequence” and “minimal joining”. The idea of a concept’s being intermediate between concepts of two different sorts is captured by the technical notion of “intervenient”, defined in terms of weakest ground and strongest consequence. A legal example concerning grounds and consequences of “ownership” and “trust” is used to illustrate the application of the formal theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aristotle.: The Nichomachean Ethics, transl. by Ross, W. D., Book V, http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/nicomachaen.5.v.html

  2. Grossi, D.: Designing Invisible Handcuffs. Formal Investigations in Institutions and Organizations for Multi-agent Systems. SIKS Dissertation Series No. 2007-16 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lindahl, L.: Position and Change. A Study in Law and Logic. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindahl, L.: Deduction and Justification in the Law: The Role of Legal Terms and Concepts. Ratio Juris 17, 182–202 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J.: Intermediate Concepts as Couplings of Conceptual Structures. In: Prakken, H., McNamara, P. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Informations Systems. New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J.: An Algebraic Analysis of Normative Systems. Ratio Juris 13, 261–278 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J.: Normative Systems and Their Revision: An Algebraic Approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11, 81–104 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J.: Normative Positions within an Algebraic Approach to Normative Systems. Journal Of Applied Logic 2, 63–91 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J.: Intermediate Concepts in Normative Systems. In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4048. Springer, Heidelberg (2006a)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J.: Open and Closed Intermediaries in Normative Systems. In: van Engers, T.M. (ed.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems (Jurix 2006). IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006b)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J.: Intermediaries and Intervenients in Normative Systems. Journal of Applied Logic (June 29, 2007); (Article in Press, Corrected Proof), doi:10.1016/j.jal.2007.06.010

    Google Scholar 

  12. Odelstad, J., Lindahl, L.: The Role of Connections as Minimal Norms in Normative Systems. In: Bench-Capon, T., Daskalopulu, A., Winkels, R. (eds.) Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sartor, G.: The Nature of Legal Concepts: Inferential Nodes or Ontological Categories? EUI working paper LAW No. 2007/08. European University Institute. Department of Law (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ron van der Meyden Leendert van der Torre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lindahl, L., Odelstad, J. (2008). Strata of Intervenient Concepts in Normative Systems. In: van der Meyden, R., van der Torre, L. (eds) Deontic Logic in Computer Science. DEON 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5076. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70525-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70525-3_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70524-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70525-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics