Abstract
Not all urban phenomena have something in common; they may differ by type or economic and social function. This is the reason why a type-grouping of the type of replacement and redesign of the economic and social functions is necessary: this implication describes and defines the different phenomena of urban revision. We have to privilege the homogeneities of the events, and around this formalize an urban description and consistent terms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the following text (Chap. 2) the model’s name will be anticipated by a number. This will permit making a comparison more easier.
- 2.
(a) Central business district; (b) Wholesale, light manufacturing; (c) Low-class residential; (d) Medium-class residential; (e) High-class residential: (f) Heavy manufacturing; (g) Outlying business district; (h) Residential suburb; (i) Industrial suburb.
- 3.
New York passed from 79,000 inhabitants in 1800 to 3,000,000 in 1890 with a strong increase in the second half of that century. London in that century passed from 1,000,000 inhabitants to 6,700,000. The increase of N.Y. is 38 times its inhabitants when considering the time, the increase is more concentrated after 1850. Chicago, the third largest city of the USA, increased by 270 times in the 1850s (Gkaeser 2009).
- 4.
During the 1950s the South End’s housing stock began to deteriorate, and a significant number of structures were abandoned. In the early 1960s, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) began a massive urban redevelopment program that demolished one-fifth of the neighborhood’s housing stock and displaced 2,000 households. During the mid-1960s, private developers began to invest large sums in areas immediately bordering the South End. The Prudential Center complex of stores, offices, and hotels was built on the neighborhood’s northwest border. At the same time Boston University began to expand vigorously. By the early 1970s the area surrounding the South End had undergone considerable office expansion, culminating in the completion of prestigious buildings (Schill et al. 1983, p. 74).
- 5.
Amin and Thrift (2002) question whether companies rather than cities are globally competitive, unless we consider cities to have their own nearly “organic” life. Scott (1988) and Castells and Himanen (2002) downsize the statement when they say that it is production that moves into the city in opposition to the decentralization policies. Considering this book on its wholeness, it is not relevant to know which element leads to the global city and makes competition a boosting factor for replacement and innovation.
- 6.
The 14 most central districts of Greater London, out of 33 Districts: City, Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Hammersmith and Fulham, Wandsworth, Lambeth, Southwark, Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Islington, Camden, Lewisham, Greenwich, Newham.
- 7.
In France the (2) Redevelopment (“renovattion urbane”) is mostly focused on the urban suburbs (banlieus pauvres) where, under the “Project de loi d’orientation et de programmation pour le ville,” in 4 years (2003–2008), demolitions for more than 200,000 buildings were scheduled and following partial rebuilding, even in different form, was planned. In France, more than 50% of the population (about 30 million) live in the outskirts (or suburban areas). In Italy, in the 12 largest cities of the country, 65% live in the outskirts but if we consider the entire national territory this percentage falls below the rate in France. In any case, we are in presence of large areas that are potentially within (2) Redevelopment.
- 8.
Middle Italian city of Northen Italy.
- 9.
The new functions included in the Lingotto center after the Renewal are the following: a large hotel, 11 movie theaters, training and universities halls, fair and exhibition pavilions, an auditorium, a congress center, a shopping center, underground parking areas. With its length of 700 m and a 1-km-long racing track on the roof, the Lingotto center is ten times larger than the Pompidou Center. In his “Vers une architecture,” Le Corbusier defined the Lingotto as one of the most spectacular and extraordinary examples of industrial building: a city within a city. The Lingotto is run by a Limited Liability Company made up of Fiat (33.3%), Italian State Railways (16.6%), the Turin Municipality, a number of Banks (San Paolo, Ina, Toro, Crt e Popolare di Novara), and others.
- 10.
The following general criteria need to be complied with: adequate quantity of population and of supporting structures and plans of urban development; strong local partnership; integrated territorial approach; proper connection between Strategic Plan and intervention; correct consideration of the economic, social, safety, environmental and transport-related issues, even in regard to access to work and training for people living in areas strongly affected by social outcasting.
Approval is given to areas which comply with at least three of the following criteria: high unemployment rate; poor economic activity; high poverty and social outcasting; need for restructuring due to local economic and social problems; high presence of immigrants; low educational profile; high crime rate; strongly decayed environment.
Strategies need to be developed that strongly affect the selected areas and make them extremely visible; new urbanization processes and physical interventions; entrepreneurial activity and employment agreements; strategies for fighting exclusion and discrimination (equal opportunities, women, immigrants and refugees); identification of integrated and environmentally-friendly public transport (cycle and pedestrian tracks); waste reduction (at the original source); pollution reduction; development of technological potentialities of a Information and Communication Technologies (ICT).
- 11.
RDAs’ boards of directors are made up of companies, local government authorities, institutions and associations, universities.
References
Alberti, M. (2008). Modeling the urban ecosystem: A conceptual framework. In J. M. Marzluff, E. Shulenberger, W. Endlicher, M. Alberti, Bradley Gordon, & C. Ryan (Eds.), Urban ecology. New York: Springer.
Albeverio, S., Andrey, D., Giordano, P., & Vancheri, A. (Eds.). (2007). The dynamics of complex urban systems. Leipzig: Physica.
Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities. Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity. pp. 84 sgg.
Atkinson, R., & Bridge, G. (2005). Gentrification in a global context. London: Routledge.
Avery, P. (2007). Born again: From dock cities of culture. In M. K. Smith (Ed.), Tourism, culture and regeneration. Wallingford: CABI.
Bartley, B., & Treadwell Shine, K. (2003). Competitive city: Governance and the changing dynamics of urban regeneration in Dublin. In F. Moulaert, E. Rodríguez, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The globalized city: Economic restructuring and social polarization in European cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Batty, M. (1981). Urban models. In N. Wrigley & R. J. Bennett (Eds.), Quantitative geography: a British view. London: Routledge.
Bender, T. (2007). The unfinished city: New York and the metropolitan idea. NYU Press.
Bernt, M. (2009). Renaissance through demolition in Leipzig. In L. Porter & K. Shaw (Eds.), Whose urban renaissance? An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies. Abingdon: Routledge.
Berry, J., McGreal, W. S., & Deddis, W. G. (1993). Urban regeneration property investment and development. London: Taylor and Francis.
Bianchini, F. M., & Parkinson, M. (Eds.). (1994). Cultural policy and urban regeneration. Manchester: MUP.
Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: University Press.
Brenner, N., & Keil, R. (2006). The global cities reader. Abingdon: Routledge.
Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (Eds.). (2002). Spaces of neoliberalism: urban re-structuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Buck, N. H. (2002). Working capital: Life and labour in contemporary London. London: Routledge.
Burdett, R. (2006). Governing Urban Transformation. Rassegna-Mutations of the Urban City, 82, 8–19.
Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (1995). Transport and communication for sustainable urban development. Amsterdam: Department of Economics, Free University. Research Paper.
Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
Castells, M., & Himanen, P. (2002). The information society and welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Castells, M., & Susser, I. (2003). The Castells reader on cities and social theory. Malden: Blackwell.
Cento-Bull, A., & Jones, B. (2006). Governance and social capital in urban regeneration. A comparison between Bristol and Naples. Urban Studies, 4, 767–786.
Christiaens, E., Mouleart, F., & Bosmans, B. (2007). The end of social innovation in urban development strategies? European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 238–251.
Coombes, M., Dalla Longa, R., & Raybould, S. (1989). Counterurbanisation in Britain and Italy: A comparative critiqueof the concept, causation and evidence. Oxford: Pergamon.
Couch, C. (1990). Urban renewal theory and practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Couch, C. (2003). Urban regeneration in Liverpool. In C. Couch-Fraser & S. Percy (Eds.), Urban regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Curwell, S. R., Deakin, M., & Symes, M. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable urban development. London: Taylor and Francis.
Dalla Longa, R. (2010). Globalization and urban implosion: Creating new competitive advantage. Berlin: Springer.
Dardia, M. (1998). Subsidizing redevelopment in California. California: Public Policy Institute of California.
Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New-build ‘gentrification’ and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1165–1190.
Deakin, M., Mitchell, G., Nijkamp, P., & Vreeker, R. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable urban development. Routledge: Abingdon.
Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Downs, A. (1999). Some realities about sprawl and urban decline. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4), 955–974.
Drewe, P. (2000). European experiences. In P. W. Robert & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration: a handbook. London: Sage.
Dunning, J., & Morgan, E. V. (2003). An economic study of the city of London. London: Routledge.
Evers, A. (2008). Hybrid organizations, background, concepts, challenges. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The third sector in Europe: Prospects and challenges. Abingdon: Routledge.
Fessler Vaz, L., & Berenstein Jacques, P. (2006). Contemporary urban Spectacularisation. In J. Monclus & M. Guardia (Eds.), Culture, urbanism, and planning. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Finkle, J., & Munkacy, K. (1985). The next wave for public-private development partnerships. The Real Estate Finance Journal, Summer
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.
Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class. New York: Harper Collins.
Florida, R., & Mellander, C. (2007). There goes the neighbourhood. Toronto: Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.
Foot, D. (1981). Operational urban models: An introduction. London: Methuen.
Friedmann, J., & Goetz, W. (1982). World city formation: An agenda for research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6, 309–344.
Gkaeser, E. I. (2009). Growth: The death and life of cities. In R. P. Inman (Ed.), Making cities work: Prospects and policies for urban America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Golubchikov, O., & Badyna, A. (2006). Conquering the inner-city: Urban redevelopment and gentrification in Moscow. In S. Tsenkova & Z. Nedovic-Buidic (Eds.), The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe: Space, institutions and policy. Leipzig: Springer.
Goodchild, B. (2008). Homes, cities and neighbourhoods. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Gotham, K. F. (2001). Urban redevelopment, past and present. In K. F. Gotham (Ed.), Critical prespectives on urban redevelopment. Bingley: Emerald Group.
Gotham, K. F., & Haubert, J. (2007). Neoliberal revitalization: Prison building, casinos, and tourism in Louisiana. In T. A. Gibson & M. Lowes (Eds.), Urban communication: production, text, context. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Hall, P. (2009). Planning London: a conversation with Pere Hall. In R. Imrie, L. Lees, & M. Raco (Eds.), Regeneration London. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hamnett, C. (2004). Unequal city: London in the global arena. London: Routledge.
Harris, C., & Ullman, E. (1945). The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 242, 7–17.
Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Harvey, J. (2000). Urban land economics. London: MacMillan.
Hee, C., & Bae, C. (2007). Containing sprawl. In G. Knaap, H. A. Haccou, K. Clifton, & J. W. Frece (Eds.), Incentives, regulations and plans: The role of states and nation-states in smart growth planning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Herold, M., Hemphill, J., & Clarke, K. C. (2007). Remote sensing and urban growth theory. In Q. Weng & D. A. Quattrochi (Eds.), Urban remote sensing. Boca Raton: CRC.
Hutton, T. A. (2008). The new economy of the inner city. Abingdon: Routledge.
Imrie, R., Lees, L., & Raco, M. (2009). London’s regeneration. In R. Imrie, L. Lees, & M. Raco (Eds.), Regenerating London: Governance, sustainability and community. New York: Routledge.
Jacobs, J. (1961 and published 10th 2002). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.
Jacobs, B. (2000). Partnership in Pittsburgh: The evaluation of complex local initiatives. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), Public-private partnership: Theory and practice in international perspective. London: Routledge.
Jones, P., & Evans, J. (2008). Urban regeneration in the UK: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
Jones, M., & Ward, K. (2002). Excavating the logic of British urban policy: Neoliberalism as the “crisis of crisis-management”. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kaufmann, D., Léautier, F., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance and the city: An empirical exploration into global determinants of urban performance. Working Paper 3712. Washington DC: World Bank Institute.
Kearsley, G. (1983). Teaching urban geography: The Burgess model. New Zealand Journal of Geography, 75, 10–13.
King, A. D. (1991). Global cities. London: Routledge.
Kraakman, R., Hansmann, H., & Hertig, G. (2004). The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities. Social conflicts and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lees, L. (2003). Super-gentrification. The case of Brookleyn Heights, New York City. Urban Studies, 40, 2487–2509.
Ley, D. (1994). Gentrification and the politics of the new middle class. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12, 53–74.
Ley, D. (1996). The middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowry, I. S. (1964). A model of metropolis. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.
Ma, L. J. C., & Wu, F. (Eds.). (2005). Restructuring the Chinese city: Changing society, economy and space. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mann, P. (1965). An approach to urban sociology. London: Routledge.
Mitchell, G. (2007). The role of modelling in urban sustainability assessment. In M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp, & R. Vreeker (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. Abingdon: Routledge.
Mondini, G., & Valle, M. (2007). Environmental assessments. In S. R. Curwell, M. Deakin, & M. Symes (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. London: Routledge.
Monti, D. J. (1990). Redevelopment and the New Company Town. New York: SUNY.
Montserrat Degen, M. (2008). Sensing cities: Regenerating public life in Barcellona and Manchester. Abingdon: Routledge.
Munford, L. (1961). The city in history. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Nijkamp, P. (1990). Mesurement in conservation planning. Series Research Memorandum, 19, 90–95. Amsterdam: Free University.
Pacione, M. (1997). Urban restructuring and reproduction of inequality in Britain’s cities: An overview. In M. Pacione (Ed.), Britain’s cities: Geographies of division in urban Britain. London: Routledge.
Pacione, M. (2009). Urban geography: A global perspective. New York: Routledge.
Park, R., & Burgess, E. (Eds.). (1925). The city. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
Parkinson, M., & Judd, D. (1998). Urban revitalization in America and the UK: The politics of uneven development. In M. Parkinson, B. Foley, & D. Judd (Eds.), Regenerating the cities: The UK crisis and the US experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Rabino, G. A. (2007). The great return of large scale urban models: Revival or “renaissance”? In S. Albeverio, D. Andrey, P. Giordano, & V. Vancheri (Eds.), The dynamics of complex urban systems. Leipzig: Physica.
Robert, P. W., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban regeneration. London: Sage.
Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In P. W. Reberts & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration. London: Sage.
Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. Abingdon: Routledge.
Rodenburg, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2007). The assessment of multi-functional land use. In S. R. Curwell, M. Deakin, & M. Symes (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. London: Routledge.
Sassen, S. (2001). The global city. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sassen, S. (Ed.). (2002). Global networks, linked cities. New York: Routledge.
Sassen, S. (2009). The global city prospective: Theoretical implications for Shanghai. In X. Chen (Ed.), Shanghai rising: State power and local transformations in a global megacity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Schill, M. H., Nathan, R. P., & Persaud, H. (1983). Revitalizing America’s cities. New York: SUNY.
Schwegler, B. (2008). Entrepreneurial governance and the urban restructuring of a Slovakian town. In S. Tsenkova & Z. Nedovic-Budic (Eds.), The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe. Leipzig: Springer.
Scott, A. J. (1980). The urban land Nexus and the state. London: Taylor and Francis.
Scott, A. J. (1988). Metropolis. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, Globalization Development. Regional Studies37 (6/7).
Sclavi, M. (and others) (2005). Avventure urbane/Urban adventures. Elèuthera: Milan.
Shutt, J. (2000). Lessons from America in the 1990s. In P. W. Reberts & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration. London: Sage.
Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist city. London: Routledge.
Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, M. K. (2007). Towards cultural planning approach to regeneration. In M. K. Smith (Ed.), Tourism, culture and regeneration. Oxford: CABI.
Taylor, J. P. (2004). World city network: A global urban analysis. New York: Routledge.
Tonkiss, F. (2005). Space, the city and social theory: Social relations and urban forms. Cambridge: Polity.
van Beckhoven, E., & van Kempen, R. (2003). Social effects of urban restructuring: a case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 18(6), 853–875.
van den Berg, L., Braun, E., & van der Meer, J. (Eds.). (2007). National policy responses to urban challenges in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Vranken, J., de Decker, P., & van Nieuwenhuyze, I. (2003). Social inclusion, urban governance, and sustainaibility. Antwerpen: Garant.
Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.
White, M. (1987). American neighborhoods and residential differentiation. New York: Russell Sage.
Williams, G. (2003). The enterprising city center: Manchester’s development challenge. New York: Spon.
Wilson, J. A. (1963). Planning and politics: Citizen participation in urban renewal. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 29, 242–249.
Wyly, E. K., & Hammel, D. J. (2005). Mapping neo-liberal American urbanism. In R. Atkinson & G. Bridge (Eds.), Gentrification in a global context. London: Routledge.
Zukin, S. (1995). The cultures of cities. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Longa, R.D. (2011). Urban Models. In: Dalla Longa, R. (eds) Urban Models and Public-Private Partnership. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70508-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70508-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70507-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70508-6
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)