Skip to main content

Abstract

Not all urban phenomena have something in common; they may differ by type or economic and social function. This is the reason why a type-grouping of the type of replacement and redesign of the economic and social functions is necessary: this implication describes and defines the different phenomena of urban revision. We have to privilege the homogeneities of the events, and around this formalize an urban description and consistent terms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the following text (Chap. 2) the model’s name will be anticipated by a number. This will permit making a comparison more easier.

  2. 2.

    (a) Central business district; (b) Wholesale, light manufacturing; (c) Low-class residential; (d) Medium-class residential; (e) High-class residential: (f) Heavy manufacturing; (g) Outlying business district; (h) Residential suburb; (i) Industrial suburb.

  3. 3.

    New York passed from 79,000 inhabitants in 1800 to 3,000,000 in 1890 with a strong increase in the second half of that century. London in that century passed from 1,000,000 inhabitants to 6,700,000. The increase of N.Y. is 38 times its inhabitants when considering the time, the increase is more concentrated after 1850. Chicago, the third largest city of the USA, increased by 270 times in the 1850s (Gkaeser 2009).

  4. 4.

    During the 1950s the South End’s housing stock began to deteriorate, and a significant number of structures were abandoned. In the early 1960s, the Boston Redevelopment Authority (BRA) began a massive urban redevelopment program that demolished one-fifth of the neighborhood’s housing stock and displaced 2,000 households. During the mid-1960s, private developers began to invest large sums in areas immediately bordering the South End. The Prudential Center complex of stores, offices, and hotels was built on the neighborhood’s northwest border. At the same time Boston University began to expand vigorously. By the early 1970s the area surrounding the South End had undergone considerable office expansion, culminating in the completion of prestigious buildings (Schill et al. 1983, p. 74).

  5. 5.

    Amin and Thrift (2002) question whether companies rather than cities are globally competitive, unless we consider cities to have their own nearly “organic” life. Scott (1988) and Castells and Himanen (2002) downsize the statement when they say that it is production that moves into the city in opposition to the decentralization policies. Considering this book on its wholeness, it is not relevant to know which element leads to the global city and makes competition a boosting factor for replacement and innovation.

  6. 6.

    The 14 most central districts of Greater London, out of 33 Districts: City, Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Hammersmith and Fulham, Wandsworth, Lambeth, Southwark, Tower Hamlets, Hackney, Islington, Camden, Lewisham, Greenwich, Newham.

  7. 7.

    In France the (2) Redevelopment (“renovattion urbane”) is mostly focused on the urban suburbs (banlieus pauvres) where, under the “Project de loi d’orientation et de programmation pour le ville,” in 4 years (2003–2008), demolitions for more than 200,000 buildings were scheduled and following partial rebuilding, even in different form, was planned. In France, more than 50% of the population (about 30 million) live in the outskirts (or suburban areas). In Italy, in the 12 largest cities of the country, 65% live in the outskirts but if we consider the entire national territory this percentage falls below the rate in France. In any case, we are in presence of large areas that are potentially within (2) Redevelopment.

  8. 8.

    Middle Italian city of Northen Italy.

  9. 9.

    The new functions included in the Lingotto center after the Renewal are the following: a large hotel, 11 movie theaters, training and universities halls, fair and exhibition pavilions, an auditorium, a congress center, a shopping center, underground parking areas. With its length of 700 m and a 1-km-long racing track on the roof, the Lingotto center is ten times larger than the Pompidou Center. In his “Vers une architecture,” Le Corbusier defined the Lingotto as one of the most spectacular and extraordinary examples of industrial building: a city within a city. The Lingotto is run by a Limited Liability Company made up of Fiat (33.3%), Italian State Railways (16.6%), the Turin Municipality, a number of Banks (San Paolo, Ina, Toro, Crt e Popolare di Novara), and others.

  10. 10.

    The following general criteria need to be complied with: adequate quantity of population and of supporting structures and plans of urban development; strong local partnership; integrated territorial approach; proper connection between Strategic Plan and intervention; correct consideration of the economic, social, safety, environmental and transport-related issues, even in regard to access to work and training for people living in areas strongly affected by social outcasting.

    Approval is given to areas which comply with at least three of the following criteria: high unemployment rate; poor economic activity; high poverty and social outcasting; need for restructuring due to local economic and social problems; high presence of immigrants; low educational profile; high crime rate; strongly decayed environment.

    Strategies need to be developed that strongly affect the selected areas and make them extremely visible; new urbanization processes and physical interventions; entrepreneurial activity and employment agreements; strategies for fighting exclusion and discrimination (equal opportunities, women, immigrants and refugees); identification of integrated and environmentally-friendly public transport (cycle and pedestrian tracks); waste reduction (at the original source); pollution reduction; development of technological potentialities of a Information and Communication Technologies (ICT).

  11. 11.

    RDAs’ boards of directors are made up of companies, local government authorities, institutions and associations, universities.

References

  • Alberti, M. (2008). Modeling the urban ecosystem: A conceptual framework. In J. M. Marzluff, E. Shulenberger, W. Endlicher, M. Alberti, Bradley Gordon, & C. Ryan (Eds.), Urban ecology. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Albeverio, S., Andrey, D., Giordano, P., & Vancheri, A. (Eds.). (2007). The dynamics of complex urban systems. Leipzig: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (2002). Cities. Reimagining the urban. Cambridge: Polity. pp. 84 sgg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R., & Bridge, G. (2005). Gentrification in a global context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avery, P. (2007). Born again: From dock cities of culture. In M. K. Smith (Ed.), Tourism, culture and regeneration. Wallingford: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartley, B., & Treadwell Shine, K. (2003). Competitive city: Governance and the changing dynamics of urban regeneration in Dublin. In F. Moulaert, E. Rodríguez, & E. Swyngedouw (Eds.), The globalized city: Economic restructuring and social polarization in European cities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M. (1981). Urban models. In N. Wrigley & R. J. Bennett (Eds.), Quantitative geography: a British view. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bender, T. (2007). The unfinished city: New York and the metropolitan idea. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernt, M. (2009). Renaissance through demolition in Leipzig. In L. Porter & K. Shaw (Eds.), Whose urban renaissance? An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J., McGreal, W. S., & Deddis, W. G. (1993). Urban regeneration property investment and development. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, F. M., & Parkinson, M. (Eds.). (1994). Cultural policy and urban regeneration. Manchester: MUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2004). New state spaces: urban governance and the rescaling of statehood. Oxford: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Keil, R. (2006). The global cities reader. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (Eds.). (2002). Spaces of neoliberalism: urban re-structuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, N. H. (2002). Working capital: Life and labour in contemporary London. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdett, R. (2006). Governing Urban Transformation. Rassegna-Mutations of the Urban City, 82, 8–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R., Capello, R., & Nijkamp, P. (1995). Transport and communication for sustainable urban development. Amsterdam: Department of Economics, Free University. Research Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Himanen, P. (2002). The information society and welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Susser, I. (2003). The Castells reader on cities and social theory. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cento-Bull, A., & Jones, B. (2006). Governance and social capital in urban regeneration. A comparison between Bristol and Naples. Urban Studies, 4, 767–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiaens, E., Mouleart, F., & Bosmans, B. (2007). The end of social innovation in urban development strategies? European Urban and Regional Studies, 14(3), 238–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombes, M., Dalla Longa, R., & Raybould, S. (1989). Counterurbanisation in Britain and Italy: A comparative critiqueof the concept, causation and evidence. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C. (1990). Urban renewal theory and practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch, C. (2003). Urban regeneration in Liverpool. In C. Couch-Fraser & S. Percy (Eds.), Urban regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curwell, S. R., Deakin, M., & Symes, M. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable urban development. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalla Longa, R. (2010). Globalization and urban implosion: Creating new competitive advantage. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dardia, M. (1998). Subsidizing redevelopment in California. California: Public Policy Institute of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M., & Lees, L. (2005). New-build ‘gentrification’ and London’s riverside renaissance. Environment and Planning A, 37, 1165–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, M., Mitchell, G., Nijkamp, P., & Vreeker, R. (Eds.). (2007). Sustainable urban development. Routledge: Abingdon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. (2006). Building adaptation. London: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1999). Some realities about sprawl and urban decline. Housing Policy Debate, 10(4), 955–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewe, P. (2000). European experiences. In P. W. Robert & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration: a handbook. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J., & Morgan, E. V. (2003). An economic study of the city of London. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. (2008). Hybrid organizations, background, concepts, challenges. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), The third sector in Europe: Prospects and challenges. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fessler Vaz, L., & Berenstein Jacques, P. (2006). Contemporary urban Spectacularisation. In J. Monclus & M. Guardia (Eds.), Culture, urbanism, and planning. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkle, J., & Munkacy, K. (1985). The next wave for public-private development partnerships. The Real Estate Finance Journal, Summer

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2005). The flight of the creative class. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., & Mellander, C. (2007). There goes the neighbourhood. Toronto: Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, D. (1981). Operational urban models: An introduction. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J., & Goetz, W. (1982). World city formation: An agenda for research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 6, 309–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gkaeser, E. I. (2009). Growth: The death and life of cities. In R. P. Inman (Ed.), Making cities work: Prospects and policies for urban America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golubchikov, O., & Badyna, A. (2006). Conquering the inner-city: Urban redevelopment and gentrification in Moscow. In S. Tsenkova & Z. Nedovic-Buidic (Eds.), The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe: Space, institutions and policy. Leipzig: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild, B. (2008). Homes, cities and neighbourhoods. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, K. F. (2001). Urban redevelopment, past and present. In K. F. Gotham (Ed.), Critical prespectives on urban redevelopment. Bingley: Emerald Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, K. F., & Haubert, J. (2007). Neoliberal revitalization: Prison building, casinos, and tourism in Louisiana. In T. A. Gibson & M. Lowes (Eds.), Urban communication: production, text, context. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2009). Planning London: a conversation with Pere Hall. In R. Imrie, L. Lees, & M. Raco (Eds.), Regeneration London. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamnett, C. (2004). Unequal city: London in the global arena. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C., & Ullman, E. (1945). The nature of cities. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, 242, 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. (2000). Urban land economics. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hee, C., & Bae, C. (2007). Containing sprawl. In G. Knaap, H. A. Haccou, K. Clifton, & J. W. Frece (Eds.), Incentives, regulations and plans: The role of states and nation-states in smart growth planning. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herold, M., Hemphill, J., & Clarke, K. C. (2007). Remote sensing and urban growth theory. In Q. Weng & D. A. Quattrochi (Eds.), Urban remote sensing. Boca Raton: CRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, T. A. (2008). The new economy of the inner city. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imrie, R., Lees, L., & Raco, M. (2009). London’s regeneration. In R. Imrie, L. Lees, & M. Raco (Eds.), Regenerating London: Governance, sustainability and community. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961 and published 10th 2002). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, B. (2000). Partnership in Pittsburgh: The evaluation of complex local initiatives. In S. P. Osborne (Ed.), Public-private partnership: Theory and practice in international perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., & Evans, J. (2008). Urban regeneration in the UK: Theory and practice. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M., & Ward, K. (2002). Excavating the logic of British urban policy: Neoliberalism as the “crisis of crisis-management”. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., Léautier, F., & Mastruzzi, M. (2005). Governance and the city: An empirical exploration into global determinants of urban performance. Working Paper 3712. Washington DC: World Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearsley, G. (1983). Teaching urban geography: The Burgess model. New Zealand Journal of Geography, 75, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A. D. (1991). Global cities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraakman, R., Hansmann, H., & Hertig, G. (2004). The anatomy of corporate law: A comparative and functional approach. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities. Social conflicts and governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lees, L. (2003). Super-gentrification. The case of Brookleyn Heights, New York City. Urban Studies, 40, 2487–2509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. (1994). Gentrification and the politics of the new middle class. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ley, D. (1996). The middle class and the remaking of the central city. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, I. S. (1964). A model of metropolis. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. J. C., & Wu, F. (Eds.). (2005). Restructuring the Chinese city: Changing society, economy and space. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, P. (1965). An approach to urban sociology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. (2007). The role of modelling in urban sustainability assessment. In M. Deakin, G. Mitchell, P. Nijkamp, & R. Vreeker (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondini, G., & Valle, M. (2007). Environmental assessments. In S. R. Curwell, M. Deakin, & M. Symes (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monti, D. J. (1990). Redevelopment and the New Company Town. New York: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montserrat Degen, M. (2008). Sensing cities: Regenerating public life in Barcellona and Manchester. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, L. (1961). The city in history. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp, P. (1990). Mesurement in conservation planning. Series Research Memorandum, 19, 90–95. Amsterdam: Free University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (1997). Urban restructuring and reproduction of inequality in Britain’s cities: An overview. In M. Pacione (Ed.), Britain’s cities: Geographies of division in urban Britain. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (2009). Urban geography: A global perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, R., & Burgess, E. (Eds.). (1925). The city. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, M., & Judd, D. (1998). Urban revitalization in America and the UK: The politics of uneven development. In M. Parkinson, B. Foley, & D. Judd (Eds.), Regenerating the cities: The UK crisis and the US experience. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabino, G. A. (2007). The great return of large scale urban models: Revival or “renaissance”? In S. Albeverio, D. Andrey, P. Giordano, & V. Vancheri (Eds.), The dynamics of complex urban systems. Leipzig: Physica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert, P. W., & Sykes, H. (2000). Urban regeneration. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P. (2000). The evolution, definition and purpose of urban regeneration. In P. W. Reberts & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary cities: Between modernity and development. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenburg, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2007). The assessment of multi-functional land use. In S. R. Curwell, M. Deakin, & M. Symes (Eds.), Sustainable urban development. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2001). The global city. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (Ed.). (2002). Global networks, linked cities. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (2009). The global city prospective: Theoretical implications for Shanghai. In X. Chen (Ed.), Shanghai rising: State power and local transformations in a global megacity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schill, M. H., Nathan, R. P., & Persaud, H. (1983). Revitalizing America’s cities. New York: SUNY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwegler, B. (2008). Entrepreneurial governance and the urban restructuring of a Slovakian town. In S. Tsenkova & Z. Nedovic-Budic (Eds.), The urban mosaic of post-socialist Europe. Leipzig: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1980). The urban land Nexus and the state. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J. (1988). Metropolis. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. J., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, Globalization Development. Regional Studies37 (6/7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclavi, M. (and others) (2005). Avventure urbane/Urban adventures. Elèuthera: Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shutt, J. (2000). Lessons from America in the 1990s. In P. W. Reberts & H. Sykes (Eds.), Urban regeneration. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1996). The new urban frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist city. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2002). New globalism, new urbanism: gentrification as global urban strategy. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. K. (2007). Towards cultural planning approach to regeneration. In M. K. Smith (Ed.), Tourism, culture and regeneration. Oxford: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. P. (2004). World city network: A global urban analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonkiss, F. (2005). Space, the city and social theory: Social relations and urban forms. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Beckhoven, E., & van Kempen, R. (2003). Social effects of urban restructuring: a case study in Amsterdam and Utrecht, the Netherlands. Housing Studies, 18(6), 853–875.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, L., Braun, E., & van der Meer, J. (Eds.). (2007). National policy responses to urban challenges in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vranken, J., de Decker, P., & van Nieuwenhuyze, I. (2003). Social inclusion, urban governance, and sustainaibility. Antwerpen: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: Urban restructuring in North America and Western Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (1987). American neighborhoods and residential differentiation. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2003). The enterprising city center: Manchester’s development challenge. New York: Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. A. (1963). Planning and politics: Citizen participation in urban renewal. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 29, 242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyly, E. K., & Hammel, D. J. (2005). Mapping neo-liberal American urbanism. In R. Atkinson & G. Bridge (Eds.), Gentrification in a global context. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, S. (1995). The cultures of cities. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Remo Dalla Longa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Longa, R.D. (2011). Urban Models. In: Dalla Longa, R. (eds) Urban Models and Public-Private Partnership. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70508-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70508-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70507-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70508-6

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics