Skip to main content

Scepticism, Relativism, Perspectivism …

  • Chapter
The Quest for the Description of the Law
  • 520 Accesses

In chapter 8 an alternative to the modernist approach is presented. For lack of better names, it is called a postmodernist approach. To explain this approach further, similarities between it and various philosophical thoughts in history are mentioned. In harmony with the conceptions of a postmodernist approach, a criticism of the belief that there is objective truth (called truth-objectivism) is developed. This criticism is thereafter supported by a scepticism concerning the need to define the meaning of truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ***Audi, R. (1999). The Cambridge dictionary of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandom, R. (1994). Making it explicit. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. (1990). Nietzsche on truth and philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (2001). Inquiries into truth and interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ***(1989). The myth of the subjective. In M. Krausz (Ed.). Relativism: Interpretation and confrontation. Notre Dame Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1980). Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1982). Working on the chain gang: Interpretation in law and literature. Texas Law Review, 60, 551–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1984). Fish v. Fiss. Stanford Law Review, 36, 1325–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, S. (1989). Doing what comes naturally. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H-G. (2003). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • ***Hegel, G.W.F. (1952). Phänomenologie des Geistes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1975). Pragmatism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ***Kaufmann, W. (1974). Nietzsche: Philosopher, psychologist, antichrist. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litowitz, D. (1997). Postmodern philosophy and law. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1968a). On the genealogy of morality. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1968b). The will to power. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (1973). Die fröhliche Wissenschaft. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. (2002). Beyond good and evil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D. (2001). Normativity and objectivity in law. William and Mary Law Review, 43:1 (October)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (page references to specific dialogues use Stephanus-pagination.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1997). Plato: Complete works, Indianapolis, Ind.: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • ***(2001). Platon: Skrifter bok 2. Stockholm: Atlantis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, H. (1978). Meaning and the moral sciences. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. O. (1951). Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review, 60, 20–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine W. V. O. (1970). Web of belief. New York N.Y.: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • ***Rawls, J. (1973). A theory of justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ***Rawls, J. (1985). Justice as fairness: Political not metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs,14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Introduction: Pragmatism and philosophy. In R. Rorty (Ed.) Consequenses of pragmatism, Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1991). Philosophical papers I: Objectivity relativism and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ***Szlezák, T. (1999). Reading Plato. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (2001). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2009). Scepticism, Relativism, Perspectivism …. In: The Quest for the Description of the Law. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70502-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics