Skip to main content

Nonholonomic Interpolation for Kinematic Problems, Entropy and Complexity

  • Chapter
Mathematical Control Theory and Finance

Summary

Here we present the main lines of a theory we developed in a series of previous papers, about the motion planning problem in robotics. We illustrate the theory with a few academic examples.

Our theory, although at its starting point, looks promising even from the “constructive” point of view. It does not mean that we have precise general algorithms, but the theory contains this potentiality.

The robot is given under the guise of a set of linear kinematic constraints (a distribution). The cost is specified by a riemannian metric on the distribution. Given a non-admissible path for the robot, i.e. a path that does not satisfy the kinematic constraints), our theory allows to evaluate precisely and constructively the “metric complexity” and the “entropy” of the problem. This estimation of metric complexity provides methods for approximation of nonadmissible paths by admissible ones, while the estimation of entropy provides methods for interpolation of the nonadmissible path by admissible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. . Agrachev AA, Chakir HEA, Gauthier JP (1998) Subriemannian Metrics on R3, in Geometric Control and Nonholonomic Mechanics. In: Mexico City 1996, 2976. Proc. Can. Math. Soc. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  2. . Agrachev AA, Gauthier JP (1999) Subriemannian Metrics and Isoperimetric Problems in the Contact Case. In: in honor L. Pontriaguin, 90th birthday commemoration. Contemporary Maths, 64:5–48 (Russian). English version: journal of Mathematical sciences, 103(6):639–663.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Charlot G (2002) Quasi Contact SR Metrics: Normal Form in R2n, Wave Front and Caustic in R4; Acta Appl. Math., 74(3):217–263.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Chakir HEA, Gauthier JP, Kupka IAK (1996) Small Subriemannian Balls on R3, Journal of Dynamical and Control Systems, 2(3):359–421.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. . Clarke FH (1983) Optimization and nonsmooth analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gauthier JP, Monroy-Perez F, Romero-Melendez C (2004) On complexity and Motion Planning for Corank one SR Metrics. COCV 10:634–655.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gauthier JP, Zakalyukin V (2005) On the codimension one Motion Planning Problem. JDCS, 11(1):73–89.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gauthier JP, Zakalyukin V (2005) On the One-Step-Bracket-Generating Motion Planning Problem. JDCS, 11(2) 215–235.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gauthier JP, Zakalyukin V (2005) Robot Motion Planning, a wild case. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 250:56–69.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. . Gauthier JP, Zakalyukin V (2006) On the motion planning problem, complexity, entropy, and nonholonomic interpolation. Journal of dynamical and control systems, 12(3).

    Google Scholar 

  11. . Gauthier JP, Zakalyukin V (2007) Entropy estimations for motion planning problems in robotics. In: Volume In honor of Dmitry Victorovich Anosov, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics, 256(1):62–79.

    Google Scholar 

  12. . Gromov M (1996) Carnot Caratheodory Spaces Seen from Within. In: Bellaiche A, Risler J.J, 79–323. Birkhauser.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jean F (2001) Complexity of Nonholonomic Motion Planning. International Journal on Control, 74(8):776–782. 210 Jean-Paul Gauthier and Vladimir Zakalyukin.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Jean F (2003) Entropy and Complexity of a Path in SR Geometry. COCV, 9:485–506.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Jean F, Falbel E (2003) Measures and transverse paths in SR geometry. Journal d’Analyse Mathématique, 91:231–246.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. . Laumond JP (ed) (1998) Robot Motion Planning and Control, Lecture notes in Control and Information Sciences 229, Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Love AEH (1944) A Treatise on the Mathematical Theory of Elasticity, forth edition. Dover, New-York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pontryagin L, Boltyanski V, Gamkelidze R, Michenko E (1962) The Mathematical theory of optimal processes. Wiley, New-York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gauthier, JP., Zakalyukin, V. (2008). Nonholonomic Interpolation for Kinematic Problems, Entropy and Complexity. In: Sarychev, A., Shiryaev, A., Guerra, M., Grossinho, M.d.R. (eds) Mathematical Control Theory and Finance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69532-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics