Skip to main content

Abstract

Much has been written about adopting agile software development within a large organisation. A key aspect of this significant organisational change is to ensure that a common understanding of the new technology emerges within all stakeholder groups. We propose that an analysis framework based on the concept of Technological Frames (TFs) can identify where understanding is in conflict across different stakeholder groups. We used TFs to analyse data collected in one organisation in the process of adopting an agile development approach. In doing so, we identified several dimensions (called ‘elements’ in TFs) which characterise a group’s understanding of agility. In this paper, we present these elements and describe the TFs for four distinct groups. We suggest that these elements may be used by other organisations adopting agile methods to help understand the views of different stakeholder groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Lawrence, R., Yslas, B.: Three-way cultural change: Introducing agile within two non-agile companies and a non-agile methodology. In: Proceedings of Agile 2006, pp. 255–259. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Wils, A., van Baelen, S., Holvoet, T., de Vlaminck, K.: Agility in the Avionics Software World. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4044, pp. 123–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Lycett, M., Macredie, R.D., Patel, C., Paul, R.J.: Migrating agile methods to standardized development practice. IEEE Computer 36(6), 79–85 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bijker, W.E.: Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: toward a theory of sociotechnical change. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Latour, B.: The Powers of Association. In: Law, J. (ed.) Power, action, and belief: a new sociology of knowledge, p. viii, 280. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., Mangalaraj, G.: Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Communications of the ACM 48(5), 73–78 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lindvall, M., Muthig, D., Dagnino, A., Wallin, C., Stupperich, M., Kiefer, D., May, J., Kähkönen, T.: Agile software development in large organisations. IEEE Computer 37(12), 26–34 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohn, M., Ford, D.: Introducing an agile process to an organisation. IEEE Computer 36(6), 74–78 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Management Challenges to Implementing Agile Processes in Traditional Development Organisations. IEEE Software 22(5), 30–38 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Weyrauch, K.: What are we arguing about? A framework for defining agile in our organisation. In: Proceedings of Agile 2006, pp. 213–220. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Orlikowski, W., Gash, D.C.: Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organisations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12, 174–207 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Dunckley, L., Sharp, H.: An approach to the evaluation of usefulness as a social construct using technological frames. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 22, 157–177 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pellegrino, G.: Thickening the Frame: Cross-Theoretical Accounts of Contexts Inside and Around Technology. Bulletin of Science Technology Society 25, 63–72 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sarkkinen, J.: Examining a Planning Discourse: How a Manager Represents Issues within a Planning Frame and How the Other Could Do the Same. In: Participatory Design Conference, Toronto, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winograd, T., Flores, F.: Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Ablex Pub. Corp., Norwood (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Fairclough, N.: Language and Power, 2nd edn., Harlow, England, Longman (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harrè, R., Gillett, G.: The Discursive Mind. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Pekka Abrahamsson Richard Baskerville Kieran Conboy Brian Fitzgerald Lorraine Morgan Xiaofeng Wang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Sharp, H. (2008). Adopting Agile in a Large Organisation. In: Abrahamsson, P., Baskerville, R., Conboy, K., Fitzgerald, B., Morgan, L., Wang, X. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2008. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68255-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68255-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68254-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68255-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics