Skip to main content

Domino-Effect Free Crash Recovery for Concurrent Failures in Cluster Federation

  • Conference paper
Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing (GPC 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 5036))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we have addressed the complex problem of recovery for concurrent failures in cluster computing environment. We have proposed a new approach in which we have dealt with both inter cluster orphan and lost messages unlike the existing works.The proposed recovery approach is free from the domino-effect and hence guarantees the least amount of re-computation after recovery. Besides, a process needs to save only its recent local checkpoint, which is also the case for a cluster. So number of trips to stable storage per process is always one during recovery. The proposed common check pointing interval is such that it enables a process to log the minimum number of messages it has sent. These features make our approach superior to the existing works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cao, J., Chen, Y., Zhang, K., He, Y.: Checkpointing in Hybrid Distributed Systems. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Networks (ISPAN 2004), Hong Kong, China, pp. 136–141 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monnet, S., Morin, C., Badrinath, R.: Hybrid Checkpointing for Parallel Applications in Cluster Federations. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid, Chicago, USA, pp. 773–782 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta, B., Rahimi, S., Rias, R.A., Bangalore, G.: A Low-Overhead Non-Blocking Checkpointing Algorithm for Mobile Computing Environment. In: Chung, Y.-C., Moreira, J.E. (eds.) GPC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3947, pp. 597–608. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Koo, R., Toueg, S.: Checkpointing and Rollback-Recovery for Distributed Systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering SE-13(1), 23–31 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, Y.: Consistent Global Checkpoints That Contain a Given Set of Local Checkpoints. IEEE Transactions on Computers 46(4), 456–468 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tsai, J., Kuo, S.-Y., Wang, Y.-M.: Theoretical Analysis for Communication-Induced Checkpointing Protocols with Rollback Dependency Trackability. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 9(10), 963–971 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gupta, B., Banerjee, S.K., Liu, B.: Design of New Roll-Forward Recovery Approach for Distributed Systems. IEE Proceedings-Computers and Digital Techniques 149(3), 105–112 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manivannan, D., Singhal, M.: Asynchronous Recovery Without using Vector Timestamps. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 62(2), 1695–1728 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Qi, X., Parmer, G., West, R.: An Efficient End-Host Architecture for Cluster Communication. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Intl. Conf. on Cluster Computing, San Diego, USA, pp. 83–92 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Singhal, M., Shivaratri, N.G.: Advanced Concepts in Operating Systems. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Elnozahy, E.N., Johnson, D.B., Zwaenepoel, W.: The Performance of Consistent Check Pointing. In: Proceedings of the 11th Symp. on Reliable Distributed Systems, pp. 86–95 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cao, G., Singhal, M.: On Coordinated Checkpointing in Distributed Systems. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 9(12), 1213–1225 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gupta, B., Rahimi, S., Ahmad, R., Chirra, R.: A Novel Recovery Approach for Cluster Federations. In: Cérin, C., Li, K.-C. (eds.) GPC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4459, pp. 519–530. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Venkatesan, S., Juang, T., Alagar, S.: Optimistic Crash Recovery Without Changing Application Messages. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems 8(3), 263–271 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jalote, P.: Fault Tolerance in Distributed Systems. PTR Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Song Wu Laurence T. Yang Tony Li Xu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gupta, B., Rahimi, S., Allam, V., Jupally, V. (2008). Domino-Effect Free Crash Recovery for Concurrent Failures in Cluster Federation. In: Wu, S., Yang, L.T., Xu, T.L. (eds) Advances in Grid and Pervasive Computing. GPC 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5036. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68083-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68083-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-68081-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-68083-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics