Skip to main content

Introduction to Knowledge Theory

  • Chapter
Preserving Digital Information
  • 967 Accesses

Abstract

You know, Phaedrus, that’s the strange thing about writing, which makes it truly analogous to painting. The painter’s products stand before us as though they were alive: but if you question them, they maintain a most majestic silence. It is the same with written words: they seem to talk to you as though they were intelligent, but if you ask them anything about what they say, from a desire to be instructed, they go on telling you the same thing again and again.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hersh 1997, What Is Mathematics, Really, Chap. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Language analysis starting with such simple notions is thoroughly treated in Quine 1960, Word and object

    Google Scholar 

  3. For a careful exposition that identifies helpful primary sources, see Sowa 2004, The challenge of knowledge soup, http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/challenge.pdf, which includes the following example. “Overgeneralizations. Birds fly. But what about penguins? A day-old chick? A bird with a broken wing? A stuffed bird? A sleeping bird?”

    Google Scholar 

  4. The method with which the Oxford English Dictionary was created anticipated Wittgenstein. See Winchester 2004, The Meaning of Everything.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Polanyi 1966, The Tacit Dimension.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Instead it has to do with the kinds of distinction in Moore 1903, Principia Ethica.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trevedi 2005, The Rembrandt Code.

    Google Scholar 

  8. James 1905, Essays in Radical Empiricism, Chapter 4.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See the first chapter of Schilpp 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap.

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a careful analysis, see Davidson, The Method of Extension and Intension, in Schilpp 1963, The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. This essay is difficult reading because the notions involved are as subtle as they are important to any theory of language’s meanings.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Russell 1905, On Denoting.

    Google Scholar 

  12. For an elegant account of the subject, see Hilbert 1925, On the Infinite.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See PI, and also Kripke 1984, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gordon 1979, The Denotational Description of Programming Languages.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hertz 1894, The principles of mechanics, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carnap 1946, Meaning and Necessity, pp.25–32.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Introduction to Knowledge Theory. In: Preserving Digital Information. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37887-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-37887-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37886-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37887-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics