Skip to main content

Two-Period Model: State-Preference Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Economics
  • 4181 Accesses

Abstract

In the last chapter we have assumed that investors base their decisions on the mean-variance approach. This helped us to develop a model for pricing assets on a financial market, the CAPM. In this chapter we want to generalize this model in that we relax the assumptions on the preferences of the investors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Lakonishok, A. Shleifer, and R.W. Vishny, The Impact of Institutional Trading on Stock Prices, Journal of Financial Economics 32 (1992), no. 1, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Dybvig and S. Ross, The New Palgrace Dictionary of Money and Finance, Newmann, Milgate and Eatwell, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Magill and M. Quinzii, Theory of Incomplete Markets, Cambridge University Press, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Jouini and H. Kallal, Martingales and Arbitrage in Securities Markets with Transaction Costs, Journal of Economic Theory 66 (1995), 178–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Jouini and H. Kallal, Arbitrage in Securities Markets with Short Sales Constraints, Mathematical Finance 5 (1995), 197–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G.M. Constantinides, Intertemporal Asset Pricing with Heterogeneous Consumers and Without Demand Aggregation, The Journal of Business 55 (1982), no. 2, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Lévy and H. Lévy, Prospect Theory: Much Ado About Nothing?, Management Science 48 (2003), no. 10, 1334–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Hens and B. Pilgrim, General Equilibrium Foundations of Finance: Structure of Incomplete Markets Models, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Dierker, H. Dierker, and W. Trockel, Continuous Mean Demand Functions Derived from Non-Convex Preferences, Journal of Mathematical Economics 7 (1980), no. 1, 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. E. De Giorgi, T. Hens, and M.O. Rieger, Financial Market Equilibria With Cumulative Prospect Therory, Tech. report, Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper, 2007, to appear in Journal of Mathematical Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Rubinstein, An Aggregation Theorem for Securities Markets, Journal of Financial Economics 1 (1974), no. 3, 225–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Shefrin, A Behavioral Approach to Asset Pricing (2nd edition), Elsevier, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.Y. Campbell and L. Viceira, Strategic Asset Allocation: Portfolio Choice for Long-Term Investors, Oxford University Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L.P. Hansen and R. Jagannathan, Implications of Security Market Data for Models of Dynamic Economies, The Journal of Political Economy 99 (1991), no. 2, 225–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Bikhchandani, D. Hirshleifer, and I. Welch, Learning from the Behavior of Others: Conformity, Fads, and Informational Cascades, The Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (1998), no. 3, 151–170.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Abel, Asset Prices under Habit Formation and Catching up with the Joneses, The American Economic Review 80 (1990), 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Mehra, The Equity Premium in India, National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.C. Jackwerth, Recovering risk aversion from option prices and realized returns, Review of Financial Studies 13 (2000), no. 2, 433.

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Detlefsen, W. Härdle, and R. Moro, Empirical pricing kernels and investor preference, Mathematical Methods in Economics and Finance (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Y Ritov and W. Härdle, From animal baits to investors preference: Estimating and demixing of the weight function in semiparametric models for biased samples, Statistica Sinica (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. N. Barberis, M. Huang, and T. Santos, Prospect Theory and Asset Prices, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (2001), no. 1, 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. E. De Giorgi and T. Post, Second Order Stochastic Dominance, Reward-Risk Portfolio Selection and the CAPM, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43 (2005), no. 2, 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Hens .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hens, T., Rieger, M.O. (2007). Two-Period Model: State-Preference Approach. In: Financial Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36148-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36148-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36146-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36148-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics