Skip to main content

Market Analyses under the New European Communications Framework - Some Conceptual Issues

  • Chapter
Digital Economic Dynamics
  • 513 Accesses

Abstract

For electronic communications markets, a new regulatory framework was enacted and should have been transformed into national law by all member states of the EU by the summer of 2003. In fact, this new regulatory framework is composed of five different directives, stretching the goals of a harmonized regulatory approach within the National Regulatory Agencies (NRAs). On whole, the new regulatory framework is designed as to ensure the transition to general competition law. As the title suggests, our specific focus will be on the completely rearranged and much broader market analysis procedure within the new framework. In doing this, the paper is supplemented by the relevant legal documents. Accordingly, this paper makes various references to important passages in the Framework Directive, the Commission’s SMP Guidelines and IRG/ERG documents discussing methodological aspects. Concretely, the directives (especially Articles 14–16 of the Framework Directive) in conjunction with the Commission’s SMP Guidelines outline a three stage analysis process: preliminary definition of relevant commimications markets, examination of effective competition on those markets and discussion of appropriate regulatory instruments based on any competition deficits. Although it appears to be practically useful to structure these stages sequentially, logical linkages, as it will be shown, conceptually exist among them.

The views expressed are those of the author entirely and do not represent those of RTR or TKK. Professional thanks to Paul Pisjak and Christian Paiser; Very special thanks to Andy Hyacinth!!

All market analyses conducted under the new regulatory framework are subject to the (implicit) assumption of sufficiently rational consumer behaviour. All the more, our assumption appears to be reasonable since NRA’s represent a dedicated capacity for permanent market monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • BAIN, J. (1959), Industrial Organization, New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • BEARD, R., KASERMAN, D., MAYO, J. (1998), The role of resale entry in promoting local exchange competition, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 22, 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRIGLAUER, W. (2003), Generisches Referenzmodell für die Analyse relevanter Kommunikationsmärkte — Wettbewerbsökonomische Grundfragen, Bad Honnef: WIK Diskussionsbeitrag, Nr. 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRIGLAUER, W. (2004), Generic reference model for the analysis of relevant communications markets: fundamental competition issues, info, Vol. 6, No. 2, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRIGLAUER, W., PISJAK, P. (2005), Marktanalyseverfahren im neuen Rechtsrahmen — Konzeptuelle Überlegungen und erste Erfahrungen, in Lichtenberger, E., Ruhle, E.-O., eds., Die Regulierung der österreichischen Telekommunikationsmärkte im neuen Rechtsrahmen, Reihe Regulierungsrecht und Regulierungsökonomie, Band 5, Köln: EUL-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRIGLAUER, W., SCHWARZ, A. (2006), Can the HM Test be brought to an end?, netnomics (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • CARLTON, D.W., PERLOFF, J.M. (2000), Modern Industrial Organization, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLARK, J.M. (1940), Toward a Concept of Workable Competition, American Economic Review, Vol. 30, 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEMSETZ, H. (1995), The Economics of the Business Finn seven critical comments, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2002), Guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of significant market power, 2002/C 165/03, “SMP Guidelines”.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003), Recommendation of 11 February 2003 on relevant product and service markets within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services, OJ 8.5.2003 L 114/45.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2004), European Electronic Communications Regulation and Markets 2004, “10th Implementation Report”, available at the website of the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ERG, European Regulators Group (2003), Common interpretation of the SMP concept for the new regulatory framework, available at the website of the European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • IRG, Independent Regulators Group (2001), “Principles of implementation and best practice on effective competition in electronic communications markets”.

    Google Scholar 

  • KANTZENBACH, E. (1967), Die Funktionsfähigkeit des Wettbewerbs, Göttingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • KOENIG, C, VOGELSANG, I., KÜHLING, J., LOETZ, S., NEUMANN, A. (2002), Funktionsfähiger Wettbewerb auf den Telekommunikationsmärkten: Ökonomische und juristische Perspektiven zum Umfang der Regulierung, Schriftenreihe Kommunikation & Recht Band 16, Heidelberg: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • MASON, E.S. (1939), Price and Production Policies of large scale Enterprise, American Economic Review, Vol. 29, 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONOPOLY COMMISSION (2001), Wettbewerbsentwicklung bei Telekommunikation und Post 2001: Unsicherheit und Stillstand, Sondergutachten, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • MONOPOLY COMMISSION (2003), Telekommunikation und Post 2003: Wettbewerbsintensivierung in der Telekommunikation-Zementierung des Postmonopols, Sondergutachten, Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • PLUM, M., SCHWARZ-SCHILLING, C. (2000), Marktabgrenzung im Telekommunikations-und Postsektor, Bad Honnef: WIK Diskussionsbeitrag Nr. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • RTR, Austrian Regulatory Authority for Broadcasting and Telecommunications (2003), Communications Report 2003, available at www.rtr.at.

    Google Scholar 

  • SLEUWAEGEN, L. (1999), Competitive distortions and state aid to firms. How to define the relevant market, Working Paper, available at europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/library/lib-competition/doc/market_definition.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • VISCUSI, W.K., VERNON, J.M., HARRINGTON, J.E. (1995), Economics of Regulation and Antitrust, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Briglauer, W. (2007). Market Analyses under the New European Communications Framework - Some Conceptual Issues. In: Welfens, P.J.J., Weske, M. (eds) Digital Economic Dynamics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36030-8_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics