Skip to main content

Metallimplantatallergie

  • Chapter
Ossäre Integration
  • 1156 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Nickel, Chrom und Kobalt sind klassische Auslöser kutaner Kontaktallergien. Metallimplantatassoziierte allergische Reaktionen können als lokale oder disseminierte Ekzeme, Wundheilungsstörungen, Urtikariaschübe oder möglicherweise als Implantatlockerung auftreten. Allerdings scheinen diese Reaktionen im Vergleich zu den kutanen Sensibilisierungsraten selten. Zur Abklärung dienen Anamnese, Epikutantest und Analyse von periimplantärem Gewebe. Der Lymphozytentransformationstest bleibt aufgrund der schwierigen Relevanzbewertung umstritten. Eine erweiterte Datensammlung zu Patienten mit allergiebedingter Implantatunverträglichkeit soll zusammen mit Untersuchungen zu Mechanismen der periimplantären Unverträglichkeitsreaktion die Grundlage für weiterführende Empfehlungen liefern.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Schnuch A et al. (2004) Kontaktallergene im aktuellen Zeitverlauf. Allergo J 13:57–69

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goh CL (1985) Prevalence of contact allergy by sex, race and age. Contact Dermatitis 14:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Möller H (1990) Nickel dermatitis: problems solved and unsolved. Contact Dermatitis 23:217–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thomas P et al. (1996) Immunopathien der Haut. In: Baenkler HW (Hrsg) Medizinische Immunologie. Landsberg: Ecomed 1–96

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas P et al. (2000) Cheilitis due to nickel contact allergy in a trumpet player. Contact Dermatitis 42:351–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klaschka F et al. (1990) Systemically induced (hematogenous) contact eczema. Semin Dermatol 9:210–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Büdinger L et al. (2000) Immunologic mechanisms in hypersensitivity reactions to metal ions: an overview. Allergy 55:108–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Carlsson AS et al. (1980) Metal sensitivity in patients with metal-to-plastic total hip arthroplasties. Acta Orthop Scand 51:57–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Coleman RF et al. (1973) Concentration of wear products in hair, blood, and urine after total hip replacement. Br Med J 1:527–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Werfel T et al. (1997) Dichotomy of Blood-and Skin-Derived IL-4-Producing Allergen-Specific T Cells and Restricted Vb Repertoire in Nickel-Mediated Contact Dermatitis. J Immunol 158:2500–2505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Basketter DA et al. (2003) Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium. Contact Dermatitis 49:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Summer B et al. (2004) PBMC of nickel allergic and non allergic individuals display different apoptotic thresholds upon exposure to nickel and metal ions released by coins. Arch Dermatol Res 294:462

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arrighi JF et al. (2001) A critical role for p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in the maturation of human blood-derived dendritic cells induced by lipopolysaccharide, TNF-alpha, and contact sensitizers. J Immunol 166:3837–3845

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Summer B et al. (2004) Phenotype differences in monocyte derived dendritic cells from nickel allergic and non allergic donors upon nickel exposure. In: Allergy Frontiers and Futures. Hogrefe & Huber, Göttingen, pp 93–97

    Google Scholar 

  15. Europäische Gemeinschaften (1994) Richtlinie 94/27/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 30. Juni 1994 zur zwölften Änderung der Richtlinie 76/769/EWG zur Angleichung der Rechts-und Verwaltungsvorschriften der Mitgliedsstaaten für Beschränkungen des Inverkehrbringens und der Verwendung gewisser gefährlicher Stoffe und Zubereitungen. Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften (ABI EG) L 188:1

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jensen CS et al. (2002) Decrease in nickel sensitization in a Danish schoolgirl population with ears pierced after implementation of a nickel-exposure regulation. Br J Dermatol 146:636–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Merritt K et al. (1996) Distribution of cobalt chromium wear and corrosion products and biologic reactions. Clin Orthop 329(Suppl): S233–S243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Black J (1999) Biological performance of materials: fundamentals of biocompatibility. 3rd Edn. Dekker, New York Basel, pp 215–233

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goebeler M et al. (1993) Nickel chloride and cobalt chloride, two common contact sensitizers, directly induce expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and endothelial lekocyte adhesion molecule (ELAM-1) by endothelial cells. J Invest Dermatol 100:759–765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodgers K et al. (1997) Immunotoxicity of Medical Devices. Fund Appl Toxicology 36:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Urban RM et al. (2000) Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A:457–477

    Google Scholar 

  22. Willert HG et al. (1996) Tissue reactions to plastic and metallic wear products of joint endoprostheses. Clin Orthop 333:4–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Glant TT et al. (1993) Bone-resorption activity of particulate stimulated macrophages. J Bone Miner Res 8:1071–1079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Goldring SR et al. (1990) Evaluation of connective tissue cell responses to orthopaedic implant materials. Connect Tissue Res 24:77–81

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ingham E et al. (2005) The role of macrophages in osteolysis of total joint replacement. Biomaterials 26:1271–1286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miyanishi K et al. (2003) Periprosthetic osteolysis: induction of vascular endothelial growth factor from human monocyte/macrophages by orthopaedic biomaterial particles. J Bone Miner Res 18:1573–1583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Choi MG et al. (2005) Effects of titanium particle size on osteoblast functions in vitro and in vivo. PNAS 102:4578–4583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Konttinen YT et al. (2005) The Microenvironment around Total Hip Replacement Prostheses. Clin Orthop 430:28–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hallab NJ et al. (2005) Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 23:384–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thomas P et al. (2000) Intolerance of osteosynthesis material: evidence of dichromate contact allergy with concomitant oligoclonal T-cell infiltrate and TH1-type cytokine expression in the peri-implantar tissue. Allergy 55:969–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kubba R et al. (1981) Cutaneous complications of orthopedic implants. A two-year prospective study. Arch Dermatol 117:554–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Christiansen K et al. (1980) Metal sensitivity causing loosened joint prostheses. Ann Rheum Dis 39:476–480

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hallab N et al. (2001) Metal sensitivity in patients with orthopaedic implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:428–436

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Thomas P (2003) Allergien durch Implantatwerkstoffe. Orthopäde 32:60–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Goodman SB (1996) Does the immune system play a role in loosening and osteolysis of total joint replacements? J Long Term Eff Med Implants 6:91–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McKenzie AW et al. (1967) Urticaria after insertion of Smith-Petersen Vitallium nail. Br Med J 4:36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gordon PM et al. (1996) Sensitivity to sternotomy wires may cause postoperative pruritus. Ann Thorac Surg 61:1514–1516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hayashi K et al. (1999) Allergic contact dermatitis and osteomyelitis due to sternal stainless steel wire. Contact Dermatitis 41:115–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Willert HG et al. (2000) Histopathologische Veränderungen bei Metall/Metall-Gelenken geben Hinweise auf eine zellvermittelte überempfindlichkeit. Osteologie 9:165–179

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gawkrodger DJ (1993) Nickel sensitivity and the implantation of orthopaedic prostheses. Contact Dermatitis 28:257–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas P et al. (2001) In vitro T cell reactivity in nickel allergy: comparison of T cell clonality, cytokine expression and mediator production. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 124:292–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, P., Summer, B. (2006). Metallimplantatallergie. In: Ossäre Integration. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35687-5_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35687-5_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22721-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35687-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics