Skip to main content

Preference, Utility, and Choice: Classic Models

  • Chapter
Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference

Abstract

In this Chapter we present the basic models used in individual and social choice theory, microeconomics, decision theory, etc., to describe individual preferences and choices over alternatives, and the links between those models. Section 2.2 bears on the main types of binary relations used to represent preferences, namely, linear orders, weak orders, partial orders and acyclic relations. We also define here the notion of a partition of the set of alternatives and study the relation between the class of ordered partitions and the class of weak orders. Section 2.3 defines the notion of choice rationalizable by a binary relation, also called ‘pair-dominant choice’. Each class of preference relations has a class of pair-dominant choice functions rationalizable by the relations from this class associated with it. Another classic model of choice described in Section 2.4 deals with the selection of the alternatives that are ‘optimal’ according to one or several criteria. The case of one criterion leads to the utility maximization model whereas one of its generalizations is the Paretian multicriterion model. It is shown that the choice functions defined by these utility models are the classes of pair-dominant choice functions rationalizable by linear orders, weak orders and partial orders, respectively. Section 2.5 presents several rationality conditions for choice functions and studies their relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

2.7 Concluding Remarks and Guide to the Literature

  • Aizerman, M. and Aleskerov, F. (1991) Choice of Options (Fundamentals of the theory), Moscow, Nauka (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizerman, M. and Aleskerov, F. (1995) Theory of Choice, North-Holland, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizerman, M. and Malishevski, A. (1981a) Some aspects of general theory of the choice of best alternatives, Automation and Remote Control, 2, 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizerman, M. and Malishevski, A. (1981b) General theory of best variants choice: some aspects, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-26(5), 1030–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aizerman, M., Zavalishin, N. and Pyatnitski E. (1977) Global set functions in the theory of alternatives’ choice, Automation and Remote Control, 3, 111–125; 5, 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizerman, M. and Aleskerov, F. (1995) Theory of Choice, North-Holland, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1959) Rational choice functions and orderings, Economica, 26, 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. (1963) Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd ed., Yale University Press, New Haven. First edition, 1951, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aumann, R. (1986) Rationality and bounded rationality, Nancy L. Schwartz Memorial Lecture, J.L. Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. (1948) Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D.H., Bordes, G., Kelly, J. and Suzumura, K. (1976) Impossibility theorems without collective rationality, Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 361–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogart, K. (2000) Introductory Combinatorics, Harcourt/Academic Press, San Diego, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordes, G. (1979) Some more results on consistency, rationality and collective choice, in Aggregation and revelation of preferences, J. J. Laffont (ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 175–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantor, G. (1895) Beitrage zur begrüngüng der transfiniten mengenlehre, Mathematische Annalen, 46, 486–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegieleski, P. (1987) Historique de la théorie élémentaire des ensembles in Fragments d’histoire des mathématiques, Brochure APEMP 65, 161–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernoff, H. (1954) Rational selection of decision functions, Econometrica, 22, 422–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S.A. (1990) A folk meta-theorem in the foundations of utility theory, Mathematical Social Sciences, 19(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condorcet, Marquis de (1785) Essai sur l’application de l’analyse à la probabilité des decisions rendues à la pluralité des voix, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Morgan, A. (1864) On the symbols of Logic I, Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 9, 78–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emel’yanov, S. and Nappelbaum, E. (1977) Methods of study of complex systems 1: Logic of rational choice, Tekhnicheskaya Kibernetika, Itogi nauki i tekhniki, Moscow, 8, 101–187 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1972) Mathematics for Decision Theory, Mouton, The Hague, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1985) Interval Graphs and Interval Orders, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn, P.C. (1975) Semiorders and Choice Functions, Econometrica, 43(5–6), 975–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilbaud, G-Th. (1954) Leçons sur les éléments principaux de la théorie mathématique des jeux, Éditions du CNRS, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausdorff, F. (1914) Grundzüge der Mengenlehere, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberger, H.G. (1973) Ordinal preference and rational choice, Econometrica, 41(2), 187–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, E.V. (1905) The continuum as a type of order, Annals of Mathematics, 6, 151–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D.T., Lau, L. J. (1973) Semiorders and the theory of choice, Econometrica, 41(5), 901–912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamison, D.T., Lau, L. J. (1975) Semiorders and the theory of choice: a correction, Econometrica, 43, 975–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.H., Roush, F.W. (1979) Characterization of certain choice functions, Journal of Economic Theory, 20(2), 271–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malishevski, A. (1998) Qualitative Models in the Theory of Complex Systems, Nauka, Moscow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirkin, B.G., (1979) Group Choice, Winston, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjardet, B. (1978) Axiomatiques et propriétés des quasi-ordres, Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, 63, 51–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monjardet, B., Raderanirina V. (2001) The duality between the anti-exchange closure operators and the path-independent choice operators on a finite set, Mathematical Social Sciences, 41, 131–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1985) Choice functions over a finite set: A summary, Social Choice and Welfare, 2, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, H. (1988) Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J.F., Jr. (1950) The bargaining problem, Econometrica, 18(2), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1889) Cours d’Économie Politique, Rouge, Lausanne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pareto, V. (1909) Manuel d’Économie Politique, V. Giard and E. Brière, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1880) On the algebra of logic, American Journal of Mathematics, 3, 15–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1881) On the logic of number, American Journal of Mathematics, 4, 85–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1883) A theory of probable inference. Note B: the logic of relatives, in Studies in logic by members of the John Hopkins University, 187–203, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C.S. (1897) The logic of relatives, The Monist, 7, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott, C.R. (1973) Path independence, rationality and social choice, Econometrica, 41(6), 1075–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, M.K. (1971) Rational choice, in Preference, Utility and Demand, J.S. Chipman, L. Hurwicz, M.K. Richter and H.F. Sonnenshein (eds.), Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, F.S. (1976) Discrete Mathematical Models, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1969) Algèbre moderne et théorie des graphes, vol. I, Dunod, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, B. (1970) Algèbre moderne et théorie des graphes, vol. II, Dunod, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1938) A note on the pure theory of consumers behavior, Economica, 5, 61–71, 353–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P.A. (1950) The problem of the integrability in utility, Economica, 17(68), 355–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, E. (1890–1895) Vorlesungen ûber die Algebra der Logik, Vol. 3, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, T. (1976) Choice functions, ‘rationality’ conditions, and variations of the weak axiom of revealed preference, Journal of Economic Theory, 13(3), 414–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden Day, San-Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1971) Choice functions and revealed preference, Review of Economic Studies, 38(3), 307–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1987) Rational behavior, in The New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics, J. Eatwell, M. Milgate and P. Newman (eds.), 4, 68–76, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1993) Internal consistency of choice, Econometrica, 61(3), 495–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1994) The formulation of rational choice, American Economic Review, 84, 385–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1997) Maximization and the act of choice, Econometrica, 65(4), 745–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shreider, Y. A. (1971) Equity, Similarity, Order, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzumura, K. (1983) Rational Choice, Collective Decisions and Social Welfare, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzawa, H. (1957) Note on preference and axioms of choice, Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 8, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A.N., Russel, B. (1910) Principia Mathematica t1, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2007). Preference, Utility, and Choice: Classic Models. In: Utility Maximization, Choice and Preference. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-34183-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics