Skip to main content

On the Structure of Reconciliations

  • Conference paper
Comparative Genomics (RCG 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 3388))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present an extended model related to reconciliation concepts. It is based on gene duplications, gene losses and speciation events. We define an evolutionary scenario (called a DLS-tree) which informally can represent an evolution of genes in species. We are interested in all scenarios – not only parsimonious ones. We propose a system of rules for transforming the scenarios. We prove that the system is confluent, sound and strongly normalizing. We show that a scenario in normal form (i.e. non-reducible) is unique and minimal in the sense of the cost computed as the total number of gene duplications and losses. Moreover, we present a classification of the scenarios and analyze their hierarchy. Finally, we prove that the tree in normal form could be easily transformed into the reconciled tree [12] in duplication-loss model. This solves some open problems stated in [13].

Financial support is provided by KBN Grant 4 T11F 020 25.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arvestad, L., Berglund, A.-C., Lagergren, J., Sennblad, B.: Gene tree reconstruction and orthology analysis based on an integrated model for duplications and sequence evolution. In: RECOMB 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bonizzoni, P., Vedova, G.D., Dondi, R.: Reconciling gene trees to a species tree. Algorithms and Complexity. In: Petreschi, R., Persiano, G., Silvestri, R. (eds.) CIAC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2653, pp. 120–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Charleston, M.A.: Jungles: A new solution to the host/parasite phylogeny reconciliation problem. Mathematical Biosciences 149, 191–223 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Eulenstein, Vingron: On the equivalence of two tree mapping measures. DAMATH: Discrete Applied Mathematics and Combinatorial Operations Research and Computer Science 88 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eulenstein, O., Mirkin, B., Vingron, M.: Duplication-based measures of difference between gene and species trees. Journal of Computational Biology 1, 135–148 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman, M., Czelusniak, J., Moore, G.W., Romero-Harrera, A.E., Matsuda, G.: Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage. A parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28, 132–163 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hallett, M.T., Lagergren, J.: New algorithms for the duplication-loss model. In: Proceedings of RECOMB 2000, Tokyo, pp. 138–146. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, B., Li, M., Zhang, L.: On Reconstructing Species Trees from Gene Trees in Term of Duplications and Losses. In: RECOMB 1998, pp. 182–191 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, B., Li, M., Zhang, L.: From gene trees to species trees. SIAM Journal of Comput. 30, 792–852 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Górecki, P.: Reconciliation problems for duplication, loss and horizontal gene transfer. In: RECOMB 2004, San Diego (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mirkin, B., Muchnik, I., Smith, T.F.: A biologically meaningful model for comparing molecular phylogenies. J. of Comput. Biol. 2, 492–507 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Page, R.D.M.: Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. Systematic Biology 43, 58–77 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Page, R.D.M., Charleston, M.A.: Reconciled trees and incogruent gene and species trees. Mathematical Hierarchies and Biology. DIMACS Series in Mathematics and Theoretical Computers Science, vol. 37(57–70) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Page, R.D.M.: Component analysis: A valiant failure? Cladistics 6, 119–136 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muchnik, I., Guigo, R., Smith, T.: Reconstruction of ancient molecular phylogeny. Mol. Phy. and Evol. 6, 189–213 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, L.: On a mirkin-muchnik-smith conjecture for comparing molecular phylog enies. Journal of Computational Biology 4(2), 177–188 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Górecki, P., Tiuryn, J. (2005). On the Structure of Reconciliations. In: Lagergren, J. (eds) Comparative Genomics. RCG 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3388. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32290-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-32290-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-24455-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32290-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics