Skip to main content

Potentials to reduce deforestation by enhancing the technical efficiency of crop production in forest margin areas

  • Chapter
Stability of Tropical Rainforest Margins

Part of the book series: Environmental Science and Engineering ((ENVSCIENCE))

Abstract

The establishment of tree crop plantations such as oil palms, coffee, or cocoa considerably contributes to the loss of tropical forests. Taking the case of cocoa production in Central Sulawesi as an example, this chapter investigates whether there is a potential for reducing deforestation by improving the productivity of tree crop plantations in rainforest margin areas by better crop management. Increased productivity would enable farmers to earn a living from a smaller area of land; thus, the expansion of low-productivity perennial cropping systems into forest land can be viewed as a waste of forest resources. In order to assess whether the productivity of the existing cocoa plantations in the research area could potentially be improved, the level of technical efficiency attained is estimated. A farmer is technically inefficient if he fails to produce the maximum output attainable for the level of inputs he uses. Technical inefficiency is caused by lacking know-how, for example with respect to the timeliness of agricultural operations such as weed control or crop hygienic measures.

After introducing the concept of technical efficiency (TE) and describing the method of Stochastic Frontier analysis to empirically estimate the level of TE, we show how this method was applied to our Sulawesi case. Using data collected in a sample of 202 farm households, we estimate separate Stochastic Frontier production functions for the two most important crops in the research area: cocoa, the primary cash crop, the cultivation of which has become widespread only in the 1990s, and irrigated rice (paddy) that has been grown for generations. Apart from estimating the levels of TE attained, we also investigate the influencing factors of efficiency in one single statistical procedure.

The estimated average TE in rice production is 77% as opposed to only 37% in cocoa cultivation; thus, the potential to increase production by improving crop management (not by increasing the level of input use!) is particularly large in the case of cocoa. The analysis of the factors influencing TE shows that poverty and illiteracy have an efficiency reducing effect in both rice and cocoa production. Agricultural extension services significantly increase efficiency in rice cultivation while this effect is not observed in cocoa production.

Acknowledging that increasing the productivity of perennial cropping systems in forest margin areas may also create incentives for deforestation, we then discuss the conditions under which enhanced productivity can be expected to have a forest saving or a forest clearing effect. We finally assess the likely outcome of improved TE in the case of Central Sulawesi and conclude that the comparatively low efficiency level currently found indicates a considerable potential for reducing deforestation by increasing farm incomes on already converted forest land, thus meeting both environmental and economic objectives. Policy interventions aimed at realizing this potential should include improved agricultural extension focusing on technical advice on the proper management of cocoa, but, at the same time, they need to control the influx of migrants attracted by the profitability of cocoa cultivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abdulkadir-Sunito M, Sitorus MTF (this volume) From ecological to political buffer zone: ethnic politics and forest encroachment in Upland Central Sulawesi. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Zeller M, Guhardja E, Bidin A (eds) The stability of tropical rainforest margins, linking ecological, economic and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Aigner D, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics 6: 21–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali M, Flinn JC (1989) Profit efficiency among basmati rice producers in Pakistan Punjab. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71: 303–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A, Kaimowitz D (eds) (2001) Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation. CABI Publishing, in association with Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Wallingford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen A, van Soest D, Kaimowitz D, Bulte E (2001) Technological change and deforestation: a theoretical overview. In: Angelsen A and Kaimowitz D (eds) Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation. CABI Publishing, in association with Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Wallingford, UK, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Battese GE (1992) Frontier production functions and technical efficiency: A survey of empirical applications in agricultural economics. Agricultural Economics 7: 185–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese GE (1997) A note on the estimation of Cobb-Douglas production functions when some explanatory variables have zero values. Journal of Agricultural Economics 48: 250–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battese GE, Coelli TJ (1995) A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20: 325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bravo-Ureta BE, Pinheiro AE (1993) Efficiency analysis of developing country agriculture: A review of the frontier function literature. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 22: 88–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Brümmer B (2001) Estimating confidence intervals for technical efficiency: The case of private farms in Slovenia. European Review of Agricultural Economics 28: 285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers RG (1988) Applied production analysis: A dual approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ (1996) A guide to FRONTIER Version 4.1: A computer program for stochastic frontier production and cost function estimation. CEPA Working Paper 96/07. Centre for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, Battese GE (1998) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (1993) Peasant economics. Farm households and agrarian development. 2nd Edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Eswaran M, Kotwal A (1989) Credit as insurance in agrarian economies. Journal of Development Economics 31: 37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120: 253–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder G, Just R, Silberman D (1985) Adoption of agricultural innovations in developing countries: A survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change 33: 255–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimbol KC, Battese GE, Fleming EM (1995) Technical efficiencies of smallholder cocoa producers in Papua New Guinea: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture 34: 337–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene WH (1990) A Gamma-distributed stochastic frontier model. Journal of Econometrics 46: 141–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondrow J, Lovell CAK, Materov IS, Schmidt P (1982) On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometrics 19: 233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz D, Angelsen A (1998) Economic models of tropical deforestation: A review. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan K (1981) An econometric analysis of yield variability in paddy production. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 29: 283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalirajan K (1990) On measuring economic efficiency. Journal of Applied Econometrics 5: 75–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Kodde DA, Palm FC (1986) Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica 54: 1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumbhakar SC, Ghosh S, McGuckin JT (1991) A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in U.S. dairy farms. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 9: 279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maertens M (2003) Economic modeling of agricultural land-use patterns in forest frontier areas: Theory, empirical assessment and policy implications for Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. dissertation.de-Verlag im Internet, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen W, van den Broeck J (1977) Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review 18: 435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitt MM, Lee LF (1981) Measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry. Journal of Development Economics 9:43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reifschneider D, Stevenson R (1991) Systematic departures from the frontier: A framework for the analysis of firm inefficiency. International Economic Review 32: 715–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf F (2001) Tree crops as deforestation and reforestation agents: the case of cocoa in Côte d’Ivoire and Sulawesi. In: Angelsen A and Kaimowitz D (eds) Agricultural technologies and tropical deforestation. CABI Publishing, in association with Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Wallingford, UK, pp 291–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiford LM (1996) Data Envelopment Analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995). Journal of Productivity Analysis 7: 99–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson RE (1980) Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation. Journal of Econometrics 13: 57–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiam A, Bravo-Ureta BE, Rivas TE (2001) Technical efficiency in developing country agriculture: A meta analysis. Agricultural Economics 25: 235–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Thünen JH (1826) Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationaloekonomie. Reprint in 5th edition (1990). Scientia Verlag, Aalen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber R, Faust H, Schippers B, Mamar S, Sutarto E, Kreisel W (this volume) Migration and ethnicity as cultural impact factors on land use change in the rainforest margins of Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Zeller M, Guhardja E, Bidin A (eds) The stability of tropical rainforest margins, linking ecological, economic and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF (1981) Lore Lindu National Park Management Plan 1981–1986. A World Wildlife Fund report for the Directorate of Nature Conservation. Bogor, Indonesia

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller M, Schrieder G, von Braun J, Heidhues F (1997) Rural finance for food security for the poor: Implications for policy and research. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner A, Kmenta J, Drèze J (1966) Specification and estimation of Cobb-Douglas production function models. Econometrica 34: 784–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keil, A., Birner, R., Zeller, M. (2007). Potentials to reduce deforestation by enhancing the technical efficiency of crop production in forest margin areas. In: Tscharntke, T., Leuschner, C., Zeller, M., Guhardja, E., Bidin, A. (eds) Stability of Tropical Rainforest Margins. Environmental Science and Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30290-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics