Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prinzipien der Laparoskopie

  • Chapter
Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie

Zusammenfassung

Die erste laparoskopische Cholezystektomie 1987 bildete den Startpunkt für einen breiten klinischen Einsatz der Laparoskopie in der Chirurgie. Geringere postoperative Schmerzen, eine rasche Rekonvaleszenz und bessere Kosmetik faszinierten gleichermaßen Chirurgen und Patienten und bewirkten eine explosionsartige weltweite Verbreitung laparoskopischer Operationen. Initial engagierten Enthusiasten vorbehalten sind laparoskopische Operationstechniken heutzutage etablierter und unverzichtbarer Bestandteil des viszeralchirurgischen Tätigkeitsspektrums.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Baraka A, Jabbour S, Hammoud R, Aouad M, Najjar F, Khoury G, Sibai A (1994) End-tidal carbon dioxide tension during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Correlation with baseline value prior to carbon dioxide insufflation. Anaesthesia 49:304–306

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bittner R, Schmedt CG, Schwarz J, Kraft K, Leibl BJ (2002) Laparoscopic transperitoneal procedure for routine repair of groin hernias. Br J Surg 89:1062–1066

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonjer HJ, Hazebroek EJ, Kazemier G, Guiffrida MC, Meijer WS, Lange JF (1997) Open vs closed establishment of pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 84:599–602

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buunen M, Gholghesaei M, Veldkamp R, Meijer DW, Bonjer HJ, Bouvy ND (2004) Stress response to laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:1022–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Byron JW, Markenson G, Miyazawa K (1993) A randomized comparison of Veress needle and direct trocar insertion for laparoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 177:259–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Catarci M, Carlini M, Gentileschi P, Santoro E (2001) Major and minor injuries during the creation of pneumoperitoneum. A multicenter study on 12,919 cases. Surg Endosc 15:566–569

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N (1996) Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:366–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Derouin M, Couture P, Boudeault D, Girard D, Gravel D (1996) Detection of gas embolism by transesophageal echocardiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Anlag 82:119–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolsa A, Sung Tao K, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fervers C (1933) Die Laparoskopie mit dem Cystoskop. Med Klein 29:1042–1045

    Google Scholar 

  • Haroun-Bizri S, El Rassi T (2001) Successful resuscitation after catastrophic carbon dioxide embolism during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Anesthesiol 18:118–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson HM (1971) A modified instrument and method for laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 110:886–887

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henny CP, Hofland J (2005) Laparoscopic surgery. Pitfalls due to anesthesia, positioning, and pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 19:1163–1171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger F, Klaiber C (2002) Trokarhernien. Eine seltene, potentiell gefährliche Komplikation nach laparoskopischen Eingriffen. Chirurg 73:899–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (1997) Needle and trocar injuries during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc 121:1198–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh CH (2003) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 13:5–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobaeus HC (1910) Über die Möglichkeit die Zystoskopie bei der Untersuchung seröser Höhlen anzuwenden. Münch Med Wochenschrift 57:2090–2092

    Google Scholar 

  • Junghans T, Böhm B, Gründel K, Schwenk W, Müller JM (1997) Effects of pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide, argon, or helium on hemodynamic and respiratory function. Arch Surg 132:272–278

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Junghans T, Böhm B, Gründel K, Schwenk W, Müller JM (1997) Does pneumoperitoneum with different gases, body positions, and intraperitoneal pressures influence renal blood flow? Surgery 121:206–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalhan SB, Reaney JA, Collins RL (1990) Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema during laparoscopy. Cleve Clin J Med 57:639–642

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalk H (1929) Erfahrungen mit der Laparoskopie. Z Klin Med 11:303–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazama T, Ikeda K, Kato T, Kikura M (1996) Carbon dioxide output in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 76:530–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelling G (1902) Über die Ösophagoskopie, Gastroskopie und Koelioskopie. Münch Med Wochenschrift 49:21–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Köckerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, Hohenberger W (1997) Verschluß der Trokareinstichstelle nach Laparoskopie. Zentralbl Chir 122:833–836

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krähenbühl L, Schäfer M, Kuzinkovas V, Renzulli P, Baer HU, Büchler MW (1998) Experimental study of adhesion formation in open and laparoscopic fundoplication. Br J Surg 85:826–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lajer H, Widecrantz S, Heisterberg L (1997) Hernias in trocar ports following abdominal laparoscopy. A review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 76:389–393

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Magrina JF (2002) Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:469–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayol J, Garcia-Aguilar J, Ortiz-Oshiro E, De-Diego Carmona JA, Fernandez-Represa JA (1997) Risks of the minimal access approach for laparoscopic surgery: multivariate analysis of morbidity related to umbilical trocar insertion. 21:529–533

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzies D, Ellis H (1990) Intestinal obstruction: How big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:60–63

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ, Jamieson GG, Brown AR Kolbe A (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90:668–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montz FJ, Holschneider CH, Munro MG (1994) Incisional hernia following laparoscopy: a survey of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. Obstet Gynecol 84:881–884

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mouret P (1996) How I developed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Acad Med Singapore 25:744–747

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Munro MG (2002) Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:365–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Gergamaschi R, Bonjer J, Cushieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Kovusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1121–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhaus SJ, Gupta A, Watson DI (2001) Helium and other alternative insufflation gases for laparoscopy. A review. Surg Endosc 15:553–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nezhat FR, Silfen SL, Evans D, Nezhat C (1991) Comparison of direct insertion of disposable and standard reusable laparoscopic trocars and previous pneumoperitoneum with Veress needle. Obstet Gynecol 78:148–150

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novitsky YW, Litwin DEM, Callery MP (2004) The net immunological advantage of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 18:1411–1419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ott D (1901) Illumination of the abdomen (ventroscopia). J Akush i Zhenk 15:1045–1049

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattaras JG, Moore RG, Landman J, Clayman RV, Janetschek G, McDougall EM, Docimo SG, Parra RO, Kavoussi LR (2002) Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery. Urology 59:37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reich H (1992) Laparoscopic bowel injury. Surg Laparosc Endosc 2:74–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Saguatti L, Vergani C, Maciocco M, Scarduelli A (2002) Major vascular injuries. Surg Endsc 16:1192–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ruddock JC (1937) Peritoneoscopy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 65:623–639

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville LE, Woods MS (1995) Laparoscopy and major retroperitoneal vascular injuries (MVRI). Surg Endosc 9:1096–1100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L (2001) Trocar and Veress needle injuries during laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 15:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schillinh MK, Redaelli C, Krähenbühl L, Signer C, Büchler MW (1997) Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 185:423–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp HT, Dodson MK, Draper ML et al. (2002) Complications associated with optical access laparoscopic trocars. Obstet Gynecol 99:553–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sigman HH, Fried GM, Garzon J, Hinchey EJ, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL, Barkun JS (1993) Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc 3:296–299

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sietses C, Bewelen RHJ, Meijer S, Cuesta MA (1999) Immunological consequences of laparoscopic surgery, speculations on the cause and clinical implications. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:250–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tittel A, Schippers E, Treutner KH, Anurov M, Polivoda M, Öttinger A, Schumpelick V (1994) Laparoskopie versus Laparotomie. Eine tierexperimentelle Studie zum Vergleich der Adhäsionsbildung im Hund. Langenbecks Arch Chir 379:95–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veress J (1938) Neues Instrument zur Ausführung von Brust-und Bauchpunktionen und Pneumothoraxbehandlung. Dtsch Med Wochenschrift 41:1480–1481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zitser YG, Simchen E, Federber N, Freund HR (1997) A trend to reduced 15-day wound infection and 6 months` mortality in laparoscopic relative to open cholecystectomy. The Isreal Study of Surgical Infections. Clin Perform Qual Health Care 5:116–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman R, Gold M, Jenkins P, Rauscher LA, Jones M, Heneghan S (2001) The effects of pneumoperitoneum and patient position on hemodynamics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15:561–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen

    A. Tittel (Priv.-Doz. Dr.) & V. Schumpelick (Prof. Dr.)

Authors
  1. A. Tittel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Schumpelick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Medizinische Fakultät der RWTH, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52057, Aachen

    Volker Schumpelick

  2. Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Technische Universität München Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81657, München

    Jörg Rüdiger Siewert

  3. Zentrum für Operative Medizin I, Klinikum der Philipps-Universität, Baldinger Straße, 35043, Marburg

    Matthias Rothmund

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer Medizin Verlag Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tittel, A., Schumpelick, V. (2006). Prinzipien der Laparoskopie. In: Schumpelick, V., Siewert, J.R., Rothmund, M. (eds) Praxis der Viszeralchirurgie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29042-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29042-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29040-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-29042-1

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation