Skip to main content

Comparison of Classification Methods for Time-Series Detection of Perspiration as a Liveness Test in Fingerprint Devices

  • Conference paper
Biometric Authentication (ICBA 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3072))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Fingerprint scanners may be susceptible to spoofing using artificial materials, or in the worst case, dismembered fingers. An anti-spoofing method based on liveness detection has been developed for use in fingerprint scanners. This method quantifies a specific temporal perspiration pattern present in fingerprints acquired from live claimants. The enhanced perspiration detection algorithm presented here improves our previous work by including other fingerprint scanner technologies, using a larger, more diverse data set, and a shorter time window. Several classification methods were tested on fingerprint images from 33 live subjects, 33 spoofs created with dental material and Play-Doh, and 14 cadaver fingers. Each method had a different performance with respect to each scanner and time window. However, all the classifiers achieved approximately 90% classification rate for all scanners, using the reduced time window and the more comprehensive training and test sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ratha, N.K.: Enhancing security and privacy in biometrics-based authentication systems. IBM Systems Journal 40, 614–634 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Thalheim L., and Krissler J.: Body check: biometric access protection devices and their programs put to the test, c’t magazine (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Willis, D., Lee, M.: Biometrics under our thumb. Network Computing (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Putte, T., Keuning, J.: Biometrical fingerprint recognition: don’t get your fingers burned. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Working Conference on Smart Card Research and Advanced Applications, pp. 289–303. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matsumoto, T., Matsumoto, H., Yamada, K., Hoshino, S.: Impact of artificial ‘gummy’ fingers on fingerprint systems. Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 4677 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schuckers, S.A.C.: Spoofing and anti-spoofing measures. Information Security Technical Report 7, 56–62 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Derakhshani, R., Schuckers, S.A.C., Hornak, L., O’Gorman, L.: Determination of vitality from a non-invasive biomedical measurement for use in fingerprint scanners. Pattern Recognition Journal 36, 383–396 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Osten, D., Carim, H.M., Arneson, M.R., Blan, B.L.: Biometric, personal authentication system”, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, U.S. Patent #5,719,950 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Seifried, K.: Biometrics - What You Need to Know, Security Portal (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lapsley P. D. , Less J. A., Pare D. F., Jr., Hoffman N.: Anti-fraud biometric sensor that accurately detects blood flow, SmartTouch, LLC, U.S. Patent #5,737,439 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kallo P., Kiss I., Podmaniczky A., Talosi J.: Detector for recognizing the living character of a finger in a fingerprint recognizing apparatus, Dermo Corporation, Ltd. U.S. Patent #6,175,64 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Valencia, V., Horn, C.: Biometric Liveness Testing. In: Woodward, J.D., Orlans, N.M., Higgins, R.T. (eds.) Biometrics. Osborne, McGraw Hill, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Biometric Group: Liveness Detection in Biometric Systems, white paper, Available at http://www.ibgweb.com/reports/public/reports/liveness.html

  14. DENTSPLY International, York, PA, http://ww.dentsply.com

  15. Kerr Dentistry, Orange, CA, http://www.kerrdental.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schuckers, S.A.C., Parthasaradhi, S.T.V., Derakshani, R., Hornak, L.A. (2004). Comparison of Classification Methods for Time-Series Detection of Perspiration as a Liveness Test in Fingerprint Devices. In: Zhang, D., Jain, A.K. (eds) Biometric Authentication. ICBA 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3072. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25948-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25948-0_36

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-22146-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-25948-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics