Skip to main content

Den Standpunkt verändern: Methoden der konstruktivistischen Grounded Theory

  • Chapter
Grounded Theory Reader

Zusammenfassung

Zu ihrem vierzigsten Jubiläumsjahr ist die Grounded-Theory-Methodologie (GTM) zu einem in verschiedenen Feldern gefeierten Ansatz geworden. Wissenschaftler/innen betrachten etliche ihrer Strategien als Standardverfahren für qualitative Untersuchungen und als Teil des allgemeinen Wortschatzes qualitativer Forschung. Sie haben weithin Kodier-Strategien und Strategien zum Verfassen von Memos über- nommen, wenngleich sie diese auf eine etwas andere Art und Weise nutzen mögen als grounded theorists. Und als grounded theorists unterscheiden wir uns untereinander natürlich darin, welche Strategien wir übernehmen und wie wir diese nutzen.

Dieser Text ist zuerst in englischer Sprache in „Developing Grounded Theory. The Second Generation“ (Morse, Stern, Corbin, Bowers, Charmaz & Clarke 2009) erschienen. Wir danken Kathy Charmaz und der Left Coast Press, insbesondere Mitch Allen, für die freundliche Genehmigung, ihn hier erstmals in revidierter Fassung und in Deutsch veröffentlichen zu dürfen. Aus dem Englischen übersetzt von Paul Sebastian Ruppel und Katja Mruck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Atkinson, Paul; Coffey, Amanda & Delamont, Sara (2003). Key themes in qualitative research: Continuities and changes. New York: Roman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, Geoffrey C. & Star, Susan L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boychuk Duchscher, Judy E. & Morgan, Debra (2004). Grounded theory: Reflections on the emerging vs. forcing debate. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(6), 605–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Antony (2002). Re-grounding grounded theory Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 4(1), 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Antony (2003). A constructive/ist response to Glaser. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(1), Art. 15, www.nbn~resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0301155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Antony & Charmaz, Kathy (2007a). Introduction. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (Hrsg.), The Handbook of grounded theory (S.1–28). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Antony & Charmaz, Kathy (Hrsg.) (2007b). The handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, Antony & Charmaz, Kathy (2007c). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (Hrsg.), The handbook of grounded theory (S.31–57). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, Michael (1991). The extended case method. In Michael Burawoy, Alice Burton, Ann Arnett Ferguson, Kathryn J. Fox, Joshua Gamson, Nadine Gartrell, Leslie Hurst, Charles Kurzman, Leslie Salzinger, Josepha Schiffman & Shiori Ui, Ethnography unbound: Power and resistance in the modern metropolis (S.271–290). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casper, Monica J. (1997). Feminist politics and fetal surgery: Adventures of a research cowgirl on the reproductive frontier. Feminist Studies, 23(2), 232–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casper, Monica J. (1998). The making of the unborn patient: A social anatomy of fetal surgery. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (1990). Discovering chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30,1161–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (1997). Grief and loss of self. In Kathy Charmaz, Glennys Howarth & Allan Kellehear (Hrsg.), The unknown country: Death in Australia, Britain and the U. S. A. (S.229–241). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2000). Constructivist and objectivist grounded theory. In Norman K. Den-zin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (2. Aufl., S.509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2002a). Grounded theory analysis. In Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein (Hrsg.), Handbook of interview research (S.675–694). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2002b). Stories and silences: Disclosures and self in chronic illness. Qualitative Inquiry, 8, 302–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2003). Grounded theory. In Jonathan A. Smith (Hrsg.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (S.81–110). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (3. Aufl., S.507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2007). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In James A. Holstein & Jaber F. Gubrium (Hrsg.), Handbook of constructionist research (S.397–412). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2008a). Grounded theory as an emergent method. In Sharlene N. Hesse-Biber & Patricia Leavy (Hrsg.), The handbook of emergent methods (S.155–170). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2008b). The legacy of Anselm Strauss for constructivist grounded theory. In Norman K. Denzin (Hrsg.), Studies in symbolic interaction (S. 125–139). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Group, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy (2008c). Reconstructing grounded theory. In Pertti Alasuutari, Leonard Bickman & Julia Brannen (Hrsg.), Handbook of social research (S.461–478). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, Kathy & Henwood, Karen (2008). Grounded theory. In Carla Willig & Wendy Stainton-Rogers (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research in psychology (S.240–259). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros-Puebla, César A. (2007). The deconstructlve and reconstructive faces of social construction. Kenneth Gergen in conversation with César A. Cisneros-Puebla. With an introduction by Robert B. Faux. Forum Qualitative SozialforschunglForum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(1), Art. 20, www.nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0801204.

  • Clarke, Adele E. (1998). Disciplining reproduction: Modernity, American life sciences and the „problem of sex“. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26(4), 553–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. (2006). Feminisms, grounded theory, and situational analysis. In Sharlene N. Hess-Biber (Hrsg.), Handbook of feminist research (S.345–370). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. (2007). Grounded theory: Conflicts, debates and situational analysis. In William Outhwaite & Stephen P. Turner (Hrsg.), Handbook of social science methodology (S.838–885). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E. & Friese, Carrie (2007). Grounded theorizing: Using situational analysis. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (Hrsg.), The handbook of grounded theory (S.363–397). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, James & Marcus, George E. (Hrsg.) (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doka, Kenneth J. (1989). Disenfranchised grief. In Kenneth J. Doka (Hrsg.), Disenfranchised grief: Recognizing hidden sorrow (S.3–12). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, Émile (1982 [1895]). The rules of the sociological method. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, Stephanie (1993). The agony of grief. In George E. Dickinson, Michael R. Leming & Alan C. Mermann (Hrsg.), Dying, death, and bereavement (S.210–212). Guilford, CT: Dushkin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujimura, Joan H. (1992). Crafting science: Standardized packages, boundary objects and „translation“. In Andrew Pickering (Hrsg.), Science as practice and culture (S.168–214). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (1991). In honor of Anselm Strauss: Collaboration. In David R. Maines (Hrsg.), Social organization and social process: Essays in honor of Anselm Strauss (S.11–16). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (1998). Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (2001). The grounded theory perspective: Conceptualization contrasted with description. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. (2002). Constructivist grounded theory? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 3(3), Art. 12, www.hnbn~resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114~Fqs0203125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Barney G. & Strauss, Anselm L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henwood, Karen & Pidgeon, Nicholas (2003). Grounded theory in psychological research. In Paul M. Camic, Jean E. Rhodes & Lucy Yardley (Hrsg.), Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design (S.131–155). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karp, David (1996). Speaking of sadness: Depression, disconnection, and the meanings of illness. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, Margaret H. (2007). From the sublime to the meticulous: The continuing evolution of grounded formal theory. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (Hrsg.), The handbook of grounded theory (S.127–150). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelle, Udo (2005). Emergence vs. forcing: A crucial problem of „grounded theory“ reconsidered. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 27, www.nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502275.

  • Kezar, Adrianna (2003). Transformational elite Interviews: Principles and problems. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layder, Derek (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, Karen (1996). Rewriting the discovery of grounded theory after 25 years? Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(1), 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E. & Fischer, Michael (1986). Anthropology as cultural critique: An experimental moment in the human sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Katharyn A. (1996). Diffusion, dilution or distillation? The case of grounded theory method. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 309–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mead, George H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melia, Kath M. (1987). Learning and working: The occupational socialization of nurses. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melia, Kath M. (1996). Rediscovering Glaser. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 368–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Jane; Bonner, Ann & Francis, Karen (2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, Janice M.; Stern, Phyllis Noerager; Corbin, Juliet; Bowers, Barbara E.; Charmaz, Kathy & Clarke, Adele E. (2009). Developing grounded theory: The second generation. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, Laura (1972). Up the anthropologist: Perspectives gained from studying up. In Dell Hymes (Hrsg.), Reinventing anthropology (S.284–311). New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nader, Laura (1997). Controlling processes: Tracing the dynamic components of power. Current Anthropology, 38(3), 711–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ödendahl, Teresa & Shaw, Aileen M. (2002). Interviewing elites. In Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein (Hrsg.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (S.299–316). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrander, Susan A. (1993). Surely you're not in this just to be helpful: Access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles S. (1958). Collected papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichertz, Jo (2007). Abduction: The logic of discovery in grounded theory. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz (Hrsg.), The handbook of grounded theory (S.214–228). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Gabriele (2004). Biographical research. In Clive Seale, Giampietro Gobo, Jaber F. Gubrium & David Silverman (Hrsg.), Qualitative research practice (S.48–64). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan L. (1989). Regions of the mind: Brain research and the quest for scientific certainty. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, Susan L. & Griesemer, James R. (1989). Institutional ecology, „translations“ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, Neil (2007). Collecting data from elites and ultra elites: Telephone and face-to-face interviews with macroeconomists. Qualitative Research, 7(2), 203–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Hrsg.), Handbook of qualitative research (S.273–285). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, Anselm L. & Corbin, Juliet (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Diane & Myrick, Florence (2006). Grounded theory: An exploration of process and procedure. Qualitative Health Research, 16(4), 547–559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Günter Mey Katja Mruck

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Charmaz, K.C. (2011). Den Standpunkt verändern: Methoden der konstruktivistischen Grounded Theory. In: Mey, G., Mruck, K. (eds) Grounded Theory Reader. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93318-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93318-4_9

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-17103-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-531-93318-4

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics